The author tells the inside story of the YES Bank feud
Over 200 people had gathered at the auditorium in Nehru Centre, the white cylindrical building on Dr Annie Besant Road in Worli, Mumbai, on June 8. They were the shareholders of YES Bank, the countrys youngest private bank, and it was their annual general meeting. In previous years, such meetings were a non-event. This year, it promised high drama a fight had broken out between the two promoter families, one led by Managing Director & CEO Rana Kapoor and the other by his sister-in-law, Madhu Kapur. Fireworks were expected.
Ranas wife, Bindu, and Madhu are sisters. Madhus husband, Ashok Kapur, and Rana had started YES Bank together in 2004. [They had shortlisted five names for their bank: Mint Bank, My Bank, Gateway, Octra and YES Bank. The brand reflects the mood of the nation, (it is) a part of the countrys momentum, Rana had told Business Standard in 2005. That, after all, was the age of India Shining!] The two partners complemented each other well. I am the poor one of the two, Rana would say, commenting on the similarity of their surnames. A banker who knew both says Kapur was more of a backroom person, while Rana was the public face of YES Bank. Kapur gave strategic directions and left the day-to-day affairs to Rana to manage, says a senior executive of a global consultancy. Kapur was different when compared to Rana, says Wouter Kolff who served on YES Banks board for eight years till May 2012. Kapur was a banker of old times: very solid, good at risk management. Rana is much more of an entrepreneur and wont take no for an answer.
Four years after setting up the bank, Kapur had gone for dinner with his wife, Madhu, to Kandahar, the Frontier food restaurant in south Mumbais Trident Hotel. The day was November 26, 2008. As they were having dinner, two gunmen appeared in the restaurant and started firing indiscriminately. The 26/11 terror attacks on Mumbai had begun. The Kapurs tried to run out of the door but got separated. Madhu managed to get out of the hotel complex. After two days, she discovered that her husband had been shot dead along with a dozen other guests. At the time of his death, Kapur owned 12 per cent of YES Bank (Rana owns 13.72 per cent). Those shares are now owned by Madhu.
It has now come to light that sometime in 2009, Madhu had asked to be inducted on the board of YES Bank. The request was discussed by the board at that time. It was found not in accordance with the fit and proper guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India and the board decided to reject it, Rana had told Business Standard earlier in the week. He also called it a one-sided dispute raised by Madhu. Rana subsequently declined to be interviewed for this article. People close to Madhu say that she had made only a verbal request, not a formal one, and was asked to wait for a couple of years. S L Kapur, who served on the YES Bank board for eight years from January 2005 to January 2013, the last five as chairman, says Madhu had met all the board members with her request. (All in the family)
The crucial factor here is the fit and proper guidelines that banks need to follow while appointing a director on the board. A circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on June 20, 2002, defined these as formal qualification, experience, track record, integrity et cetera. It said the candidate should be a graduate, between 35 and 65 years of age, and not a Member of Parliament, Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council. On June 25, 2004, RBI issued another circular which said that banks should undertake a process of due diligence to determine the suitability of the person for appointment as a director on the board based upon qualification, expertise, track record, integrity and other fit and proper criteria. Madhu is a housewife and is not known to run any business. S L Kapur, who chaired the meeting in which Madhus request was discussed, says board members need to have years and years of experience in their respective fields. For instance, I was representing the small-scale sector (he worked as secretary in the department of small-scale industries) and Radha Singh (former Union agriculture secretary) represented the farm sector, says he. We did discuss Madhus proposal and felt she was not eligible.
* * * * *On the surface, everything looked normal. Some months back, Madhu and her children, daughter Shagun Kapur Gogia and son Gaurav (he has a restaurant business), had attended the wedding of Ranas daughter, Rakhee. It looked like one big happy family, says a person familiar with the developments. Beneath the surface, there was discord. In 2011, Madhu found her name missing from the list of major shareholders in YES Banks annual report; it only mentioned Rana. She raised the issue with the company secretary, but was told that this was done to make the disclosure easier. When the information was left out in the next annual report, Madhu was disturbed.
|WHO SAID WHAT|
“Bank governance is completely driven by RBI’s regulations and not by the shareholders. YES Bank has always adhered to the guidelines of RBI while appointing directors on its board”
Rana Kapoor to Business Standard earlier this week
“The bank is doing well. But our rights should also be recognised”
Madhu Kapur after the YES Bank AGM on June 8
“An attempt to erase my father's name and our family's identity with YES Bank disturbs me the most”
Shagun Kapur Gogia
“I have attended all the AGMs of the bank as a member of the board till 2012 and nobody ever raised this issue (of Ashok Kapur’s name being struck off the list of promoters)”
SL Kapur, YES Bank director from January 2005 to January 2013
“We are all quite surprised that Madhu took legal action. There is certainly a lot of fuss and smoke”
Wouter Kolff, YES Bank director from 2004 to 2012
* * * * *Madhu, as expected, objected to the appointment of the three directors the other seven resolutions were passed. It was put to vote. Shagun was allowed to be an observer. Two days later, it was announced that 80 per cent of the shareholders had given their nod to the appointment of the three directors. Madhu may have lost the battle that day but the small shareholders (except those who were also employees of YES Bank) were vocal about her rights after the AGM. Many of them said that her rights as a promoter of YES Bank ought to be respected. Incidentally, few spoke about Shaguns elevation to the board of directors. YES Bank is doing a great job as far as business is concerned. We have no complaints in this regard, said Pawan Seksaria whose family owns a few thousand shares. The other family also has an equal right which cannot be denied just because you think that your power will get diluted. On June 10, the Bombay High Court said that the board of YES Bank should meet on June 27 to consider Shaguns appointment on the board. The outcome of the meeting has to be reported to the court on July 1.
Women's prison workshops across Italy are joining up under a new commercial fashion brand they hope will help encourage more detainees to learn the ...