You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upholds tax demand raised on NDTV

With ITAT's July 14 order upholding tax demand, penalty proceedings are likely to commence shortly

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Prannoy Roy
Prannoy Roy

The Appellate Tribunal has upheld a demand raised on $150 million investment by a in in 2008, an order which the company said has "numerous inconsistencies and contradictions".

With the ITAT's July 14 order upholding the demand, penalty proceedings are likely to commence shortly.


In a stock exchange filing, said it was surprised at ITAT dismissing the appeal it had filed against the demand.

"It is important to note foremost that the ITAT has accepted that there was no round-tripping or money laundering, as was alleged by income department," it said.

The department had alleged that Rs 218.30 crore was the that was sought to be evaded on investment of Rs 642.54 crore. It had sought a penalty of Rs 436.8 crore at the rate of 200 per cent of evaded.

It confirmed invocation of Sec 69A of Income Act (dealing with 'unexplained money' addition] and upheld that "transaction used principally as a devise for the distribution/ diversion of sum to the Indian entity" and that "the beneficial owner of the money is the assessee".

said: "Surprisingly, the ITAT has dismissed the appeal filed by the company as not being maintainable but at the same time adjudicated the appeal filed by the income department (ITD) against the same assessment order.

"It is inconceivable how appeal filed by the ITD against the assessment order is maintainable before the ITAT but the company's appeal emanating from the same order is not maintainable."

"Surprisingly, the ITAT has upheld the addition under Section 69A of the Act, purely on conjectures and surmises, ignoring the evidence adduced by the company including the annual reports of the investors," it said.

said, "The legal advice received is that a consistent view has to be taken and it appears that the order had been passed in a haste and the above inconsistencies have arisen because of a hurried order."

"We have been advised that Section 69A of the Act is applicable only when money is found in possession of a taxpayer but not accounted for in the books of accounts. However, the said section has no application in the present case since admittedly, investment made by NBC Universal (admittedly then subsidiary of the GE Group) through its step down subsidiary, Universal Studios International BV, was duly recorded in the books of accounts of the company's subsidiary, viz, Networks International Holdings BV," it said.

Stating that it will continue to fight the "misguided case" made by ITD, said it is "exploring all options available to it in accordance with law.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU