ALSO READSupreme Court raps Sebi for dragging its feet in Satyam auditor case Sebi circulars cannot be challenged in SAT, rules Supreme Court Nidhi Aggarwal & Susan Thomas: Making sense of algorithmic trading Sebi gets back discretionary powers on penalties M J Antony: Spring cleaning in the Supreme Court
The Securities and Exchanges Board of India (Sebi) is expected to take action against the statutory auditors of scam-hit Satyam Computer Services for their role in Rs 7,000-crore accounting fraud committed by the promoters between 1999-2009.
In January the market regulator was directed by the Supreme Court to conclude the matter by July this year. It was widely speculated that Sebi may bar audit firm Pricewaterhouse and its tainted partners from dealing with any listed entity for a specific period.
On April 9, 2015 the Hyderabad trial court had convicted all the 10 accused in Satyam fraud case, including PriceWaterhouse partners S Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas Talluri with rigorous imprisonment for a period ranging from 2-7 years under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.
The company's founder and chairman B Ramalingaraju was handed down a seven-year jail sentence while the two auditors were given a maximum of 3-year imprisonment, though all the convicted were given time to appeal against the judgement.
The court had delivered a 971- page judgement in culmination of six-year-long process of investigation and case trial.
The Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI) took over the case soon after the state CBCID filed an FIR against Ramalingaraju and his associates after Raju had admitted his wrongful actions through an open letter on January 9, 2009.
In its chargesheet, CBI alleged that S Gopalakrishnan(A4) and Srinivas Talluri(A5) had actively participated in the conspiracy by auditing the fudged balance sheets and certified the same as correct and thereby connived with the other accused. They signed off the accounts of Satyam Computers till the accounting fraud came to light in January.
Citing its investigation findings in a supplementary chargesheet in November, 2009, CBI stated that both Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas had received a higher remuneration as percentage of revenue compared to other IT majors while the audit fee paid by the company had finally reached to another firm called Lovelock and Lewes and all the audit team members who assisted the two Pricewaterhouse partners were also from Lovelock and Lewes.
The basic premise of the case was that the the promoter and other accused lured the investors under deception into buying the shares of the company during 1999-2009 by publishing false and inflated balance sheets to show a healthy picture about the company. While this had caused wrongful loss to the investors, the accused sold their shares at opportune times in the open market and received wrongful gain for themselves. The promoters had brought down their stake in the company to 8.59 percent from 18.75 percent during the period.
According to CBI, Raju and his family had acquired huge immovable assets worth around Rs 350 crore(documented value). They had acquired around 6,000 acres of land, 37,000 square yards of housing plots and 87,439 square feet of built up area and a total of 1065 properties by Raju and his family, it stated.
In July 2014 Sebi had ordered Raju and four of the company's former executives to pay Rs 1,848 crore on account of the unlawful gains through the sale of shares besides barring them from accessing the capital markets for a period of 14 years. However, the Securities Appellate Tribunal(SAT) had recently set aside this order.
It took another thee years for Sebi to probe into the role and the professional lapses of the company's statutory audit firm. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India(ICAI) had banned all the four Satyam auditors, including Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas for life after finding them audit-guilty.