Realty firms mull legal action against CCI order

The real estate industry, already reeling under falling profit, high interest rates and steep input costs, seems to be sticking together, fearing further action from the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The competition watchdog had recently imposed a penalty of Rs 630 crore on real estate major over “abuse of dominant position” in relation to two high-end housing projects in Gurgaon. Delayed delivery of projects and changes in the building structure were among the charges levelled against the developer. While is contemplating legal action against the order, may come out with similar orders against many other real estate companies.

“It seems all developers are getting together to work out a joint strategy to combat this,” an analyst told Business Standard. Another industry insider said: “If the order has hit one company, it would affect others soon.”

It is also learnt the government is sitting up on this issue, and may take steps soon to regulate the industry. A real estate regulatory bill has been pending with the government for a while. Most industry representatives are opposed to the proposed bill.

Industry stakeholders claimed the agreements between home buyers and developers were not one-sided and there was extremely limited scope of exploitating consumers.

National Real Estate Development Council director general told Business Standard: “The industry is definitely together (on the issue), as the case would have implications on the sector as a whole. Builder-buyer agreements are being used by everyone, be it private players or the government development authorities.”

Developers in Maharashtra, one of the biggest realty markets in India, said since agreements are drafted as in the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, there is very little scope of exploitating buyers.

“Basically, there is a standard agreement described by the Act. Therefore, there cannot be violation which can come under the purview of CCI. It is mandatory to follow the Act,” said Lalit Kumar Jain, national president, Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India.

On the penalty on DLF, Jain said: “The verdict conflicts consumer redressal forums. Already, the Consumer Protection Act is there. I don’t know whether it (penalty) is an infringement on the provisions of the Act.”

“The Constitution does not allow ignorance of law. When a consumer signs the law, he should read it. If he does not think it is legal, he should not sign it.”

RAGHAVENDRA KAMATH & DILASHA SETH

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

Realty firms mull legal action against CCI order

Nivedita Mookerji, Raghavendra Kamath & Dilasha Seth  |  New Delhi/Mumbai 

The real estate industry, already reeling under falling profit, high interest rates and steep input costs, seems to be sticking together, fearing further action from the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The competition watchdog had recently imposed a penalty of Rs 630 crore on real estate major over “abuse of dominant position” in relation to two high-end housing projects in Gurgaon. Delayed delivery of projects and changes in the building structure were among the charges levelled against the developer. While is contemplating legal action against the order, may come out with similar orders against many other real estate companies.

“It seems all developers are getting together to work out a joint strategy to combat this,” an analyst told Business Standard. Another industry insider said: “If the order has hit one company, it would affect others soon.”

It is also learnt the government is sitting up on this issue, and may take steps soon to regulate the industry. A real estate regulatory bill has been pending with the government for a while. Most industry representatives are opposed to the proposed bill.

Industry stakeholders claimed the agreements between home buyers and developers were not one-sided and there was extremely limited scope of exploitating consumers.

National Real Estate Development Council director general told Business Standard: “The industry is definitely together (on the issue), as the case would have implications on the sector as a whole. Builder-buyer agreements are being used by everyone, be it private players or the government development authorities.”

Developers in Maharashtra, one of the biggest realty markets in India, said since agreements are drafted as in the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, there is very little scope of exploitating buyers.

“Basically, there is a standard agreement described by the Act. Therefore, there cannot be violation which can come under the purview of CCI. It is mandatory to follow the Act,” said Lalit Kumar Jain, national president, Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India.

On the penalty on DLF, Jain said: “The verdict conflicts consumer redressal forums. Already, the Consumer Protection Act is there. I don’t know whether it (penalty) is an infringement on the provisions of the Act.”

“The Constitution does not allow ignorance of law. When a consumer signs the law, he should read it. If he does not think it is legal, he should not sign it.”

RAGHAVENDRA KAMATH & DILASHA SETH

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Realty firms mull legal action against CCI order

The real estate industry, already reeling under falling profit, high interest rates and steep input costs, seems to be sticking together, fearing further action from the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The real estate industry, already reeling under falling profit, high interest rates and steep input costs, seems to be sticking together, fearing further action from the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The competition watchdog had recently imposed a penalty of Rs 630 crore on real estate major over “abuse of dominant position” in relation to two high-end housing projects in Gurgaon. Delayed delivery of projects and changes in the building structure were among the charges levelled against the developer. While is contemplating legal action against the order, may come out with similar orders against many other real estate companies.

“It seems all developers are getting together to work out a joint strategy to combat this,” an analyst told Business Standard. Another industry insider said: “If the order has hit one company, it would affect others soon.”

It is also learnt the government is sitting up on this issue, and may take steps soon to regulate the industry. A real estate regulatory bill has been pending with the government for a while. Most industry representatives are opposed to the proposed bill.

Industry stakeholders claimed the agreements between home buyers and developers were not one-sided and there was extremely limited scope of exploitating consumers.

National Real Estate Development Council director general told Business Standard: “The industry is definitely together (on the issue), as the case would have implications on the sector as a whole. Builder-buyer agreements are being used by everyone, be it private players or the government development authorities.”

Developers in Maharashtra, one of the biggest realty markets in India, said since agreements are drafted as in the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, there is very little scope of exploitating buyers.

“Basically, there is a standard agreement described by the Act. Therefore, there cannot be violation which can come under the purview of CCI. It is mandatory to follow the Act,” said Lalit Kumar Jain, national president, Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India.

On the penalty on DLF, Jain said: “The verdict conflicts consumer redressal forums. Already, the Consumer Protection Act is there. I don’t know whether it (penalty) is an infringement on the provisions of the Act.”

“The Constitution does not allow ignorance of law. When a consumer signs the law, he should read it. If he does not think it is legal, he should not sign it.”

RAGHAVENDRA KAMATH & DILASHA SETH

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard