Business Standard

Swedish apparel firm Vagabond wins trademark dispute

Gets favourable order from Intellectual Property Appellate Board in dispute with Italan firm with same mark

T E Narasimhan  |  Chennai 

Swedish manufacturing firm Varberg AB has won a dispute which it moved against Italian firm in the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).

The Swedish firm, which manufactures and markets clothing, footwear and headgear with registered trademarks in UK, US, Japan, Russia, Canada and Singapore, earlier faced opposition from the Italian firm against registering its in India, since the latter claimed that it has a registered in India in the same mark, says the order.



Varberg has earlier applied for the registration of the Vagabond in Class 25, a classification of trade mark for clothing, which was opposed by herein claiming to be the proprietor of the under Number 551738. The former filed an application with the seeking the removal of the said Vagabond in Class 25 of and Carrera SPA, which is officially recorded as a subsequent proprietor.

An email sent to was not responded.

"The impugned mark is a blatant copy of the applicant’s trade mark Vagabond and should be removed from the register forthwith," said Vice Chairman S Usha and Technical Member V Ravi in the order.

"The conduct of the respondent (Vagabound SPA) in the instant case speaks for itself leaving the applicant shell shocked giving the signal that imposters can set up any claim in the registry. The substantial purpose of the trademarks law in India is to ensure orderly marketing of goods and services. Registration of the impugned (challenged) mark only defeats this objective," said the Order, while removing the trade mark under challenge from the registry.

A mail has been sent seeking comment from on the order.

The Swedish company argued that it has opposed the trade mark registration Vagabond of the respondent in many countries. It further stated that on being served with a copy of notice of opposition in August, 2005, the company, through its business network in India, investigated into the use of the impugned mark and found that it has never been used by the Italian firm. The impugned mark of was filed on 29th May, 1991 on a “proposed to be used” basis, it said.

Varberg has also submitted a list of 41 countries wherein the trade mark Vagabond has been registered along with the registration certificate and the International Registration under the Madrid Protocol among other documents as a proof.

The Italian firm has not filed any counter statement with the on the dispute. The matter was listed for hearing two days and as the respondent was again absent the respondent was set ex-parte, said the order.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Swedish apparel firm Vagabond wins trademark dispute

Gets favourable order from Intellectual Property Appellate Board in dispute with Italan firm with same mark

Swedish apparel manufacturing firm Vagabond Skor Varberg AB has won a trademark dispute which it moved against Italian firm Vagabond SPA in the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) Swedish manufacturing firm Varberg AB has won a dispute which it moved against Italian firm in the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).

The Swedish firm, which manufactures and markets clothing, footwear and headgear with registered trademarks in UK, US, Japan, Russia, Canada and Singapore, earlier faced opposition from the Italian firm against registering its in India, since the latter claimed that it has a registered in India in the same mark, says the order.

Varberg has earlier applied for the registration of the Vagabond in Class 25, a classification of trade mark for clothing, which was opposed by herein claiming to be the proprietor of the under Number 551738. The former filed an application with the seeking the removal of the said Vagabond in Class 25 of and Carrera SPA, which is officially recorded as a subsequent proprietor.

An email sent to was not responded.

"The impugned mark is a blatant copy of the applicant’s trade mark Vagabond and should be removed from the register forthwith," said Vice Chairman S Usha and Technical Member V Ravi in the order.

"The conduct of the respondent (Vagabound SPA) in the instant case speaks for itself leaving the applicant shell shocked giving the signal that imposters can set up any claim in the registry. The substantial purpose of the trademarks law in India is to ensure orderly marketing of goods and services. Registration of the impugned (challenged) mark only defeats this objective," said the Order, while removing the trade mark under challenge from the registry.

A mail has been sent seeking comment from on the order.

The Swedish company argued that it has opposed the trade mark registration Vagabond of the respondent in many countries. It further stated that on being served with a copy of notice of opposition in August, 2005, the company, through its business network in India, investigated into the use of the impugned mark and found that it has never been used by the Italian firm. The impugned mark of was filed on 29th May, 1991 on a “proposed to be used” basis, it said.

Varberg has also submitted a list of 41 countries wherein the trade mark Vagabond has been registered along with the registration certificate and the International Registration under the Madrid Protocol among other documents as a proof.

The Italian firm has not filed any counter statement with the on the dispute. The matter was listed for hearing two days and as the respondent was again absent the respondent was set ex-parte, said the order.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Swedish apparel firm Vagabond wins trademark dispute

Gets favourable order from Intellectual Property Appellate Board in dispute with Italan firm with same mark

Swedish manufacturing firm Varberg AB has won a dispute which it moved against Italian firm in the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).

The Swedish firm, which manufactures and markets clothing, footwear and headgear with registered trademarks in UK, US, Japan, Russia, Canada and Singapore, earlier faced opposition from the Italian firm against registering its in India, since the latter claimed that it has a registered in India in the same mark, says the order.

Varberg has earlier applied for the registration of the Vagabond in Class 25, a classification of trade mark for clothing, which was opposed by herein claiming to be the proprietor of the under Number 551738. The former filed an application with the seeking the removal of the said Vagabond in Class 25 of and Carrera SPA, which is officially recorded as a subsequent proprietor.

An email sent to was not responded.

"The impugned mark is a blatant copy of the applicant’s trade mark Vagabond and should be removed from the register forthwith," said Vice Chairman S Usha and Technical Member V Ravi in the order.

"The conduct of the respondent (Vagabound SPA) in the instant case speaks for itself leaving the applicant shell shocked giving the signal that imposters can set up any claim in the registry. The substantial purpose of the trademarks law in India is to ensure orderly marketing of goods and services. Registration of the impugned (challenged) mark only defeats this objective," said the Order, while removing the trade mark under challenge from the registry.

A mail has been sent seeking comment from on the order.

The Swedish company argued that it has opposed the trade mark registration Vagabond of the respondent in many countries. It further stated that on being served with a copy of notice of opposition in August, 2005, the company, through its business network in India, investigated into the use of the impugned mark and found that it has never been used by the Italian firm. The impugned mark of was filed on 29th May, 1991 on a “proposed to be used” basis, it said.

Varberg has also submitted a list of 41 countries wherein the trade mark Vagabond has been registered along with the registration certificate and the International Registration under the Madrid Protocol among other documents as a proof.

The Italian firm has not filed any counter statement with the on the dispute. The matter was listed for hearing two days and as the respondent was again absent the respondent was set ex-parte, said the order.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard