You are here: Home » Companies » News » Telecom
Business Standard

Telecom body alleges misinformation on IUC

Trai is reportedly aiming to conclude the IUC review soon and will come out with a new framework

Kiran Rathee  |  New Delhi 

Telecom, Towers, Mobile, Trai, IUC

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has said entities seeking implementation of the ‘bill and keep’ (BAK) method for interconnections between operator systems are “distorting facts”.

They’ve cited an affidavit given by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) to the Supreme Court (SC) in 2011. That affidavit, it has said, listed symmetry of traffic as a pre-condition to implement a BAK regime. The Mukesh Ambani-owned Reliance Jio had alleged the top three operators had benefited by at least Rs 1 lakh crore due to non-implementation of BAK.

During an open house discussion on the (IUC) on July 20, many participants had claimed that in 2011, had said it would implement the BAK regime in two years from 2011. is a regulation made by in which phone companies pay one another for using each other’s network to complete calls.

“Treating this affidavit that has been filed in an ongoing litigation as equivalent to a regulation, these participants have been demanding implementation of BAK,” said in a letter to  

graph
The regulator, it said, had notified regulations in March 2009, fixing the mobile termination charge (MTC) at 20p a minute. The regulations were challenged by at the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT). The latter in September 2010 asked to reconsider the matter afresh and to complete the consultation process in a time-bound manner, so that new charges could be implemented by January 1, 2011. 

However, filed an appeal in the SC against the TDSAT order in September 2010. The SC in July 2011 directed to calculate and resubmit the MTC, with and without inclusion of capex/capital cost. Subsequently, the letter said, gave an affidavit in October 2011, with calculations on MTC using different methodologies.

Later, sought the SC’s permission to notify the regulations with the rates contained in the affidavit. However, the SC dismissed the application and the said petition was still pending with the SC, said Their letter says initiated a consultation in 2014 to review and in February 2015, the MTC was fixed at 14p per minute. “During formation of regulations in 2015, deliberated on feasibility of implementation of the BAK regime at length and consequently rejected the implementation due to the reason that the level of imbalance/asymmetry did not fulfill the basic requirement of symmetry before adopting a BAK regime,” it said.

is reportedly aiming to conclude the review soon and will come out with a new framework. The issue has been a bone of contention between incumbents and newcomer Jio. The existing telcos want fully allocated cost-based IUC; Jio and Reliance Communications (a separate group) propose the BAK model, which means zero charges.