Toyota wins preliminary approval of recall accord

and lawyers suing the company persuaded a judge to give to a $1.1 billion settlement of claims that recalls for unintended acceleration hurt the value of US customers’ vehicles. The terms of the settlement filed December 26 are “fair, reasonable and adequate,” US District in Santa Ana, California, said yesterday in granting preliminary approval. Final approval will be determined following a fairness hearing set for June 14, Selna said. The settlement resolves the economic-loss portion of the Toyota sudden-acceleration litigation.

Class, or group, actions were filed on behalf of Toyota owners who contended the company drove down the value of their vehicles by failing to disclose or fix defects.

Selna yesterday granted preliminary certification of the Toyota owners as a class action, for settlement purposes only and contingent on final approval of the agreement.

The cases were combined in a multidistrict litigation before Selna, who is also handling the federal personal injury and death suits. Lawsuits claiming personal injuries and deaths caused by such incidents remain pending, with the first federal trial set for February in Santa Ana.

10 Million
The company, based in Toyota City, Japan, recalled more than 10 million vehicles for problems related to unintended acceleration in 2009 and 2010, starting with a September 2009 announcement that it was recalling 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles because of a defect that may cause floor mats to jam accelerator pedals. The company later recalled vehicles over defects involving the pedals themselves.

Toyota has paid $66.2 million in fines to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for how some of the recalls were conducted. The company last month agreed to pay $25.5 million to settle an investor lawsuit claiming Toyota’s alleged failure to disclose information on unintended acceleration problems caused the stock to plunge in 2010.

“We are gratified that Judge Selna has granted his preliminary approval of the settlement, which will provide value to Toyota customers and provides an added measure of confidence in our vehicles,” Julie Hamp, Toyota’s U.S. chief communications officer, said yesterday by e-mail.

‘Swift’ Approval
The “swift preliminary approval” will allow notices about how to participate in the settlement to be mailed in March to current and former Toyota owners, Steve Berman, co-lead plaintiffs’ lawyer, said in a statement issued yesterday by his law firm Seattle-based Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

Toyota announced Dec. 26 it would take a writedown of $1.1 million to cover the cost of the settlement. The total value of the settlement may reach $1.4 billion, including as much as $200 million in attorneys’ fees, lawyers for the plaintiffs said.

Under the settlement, Toyota will install a brake override system in more than 3 million vehicles that were subject to floor mat entrapment recalls, provide a fund of $250 million for former Toyota owners who sold their cars from Sept. 2, 2009, to Dec. 31, 2010, and provide an additional $250 million to current Toyota owners whose vehicles aren’t eligible for brake- overrides, according to yesterday’s Hagens Berman statement.

Court Approval
Toyota will pay as much as $200 million in fees and $27 million in costs to plaintiffs’ lawyers, pending final court approval, according to the Dec. 26 settlement filing.

Toyota didn’t admit to any defects in its vehicles or any wrongdoing in the settlement.

Toyota’s $1.1 billion writedown also covers an agreement in principle to resolve a lawsuit brought by the district attorney of Orange County, California, against Toyota, Hamp said Dec. 26. The Orange County suit claimed violations of consumer-protection laws through the sale of allegedly defective vehicles.

The writedown includes an agreement to settle a multistate investigation by attorneys general in the U.S., Hamp said.

The case is In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, 8:10-ml-02151, U.S. District Court, Central District of (Santa Ana).

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

Toyota wins preliminary approval of recall accord

Bloomberg  |  Detroit 



and lawyers suing the company persuaded a judge to give to a $1.1 billion settlement of claims that recalls for unintended acceleration hurt the value of US customers’ vehicles. The terms of the settlement filed December 26 are “fair, reasonable and adequate,” US District in Santa Ana, California, said yesterday in granting preliminary approval. Final approval will be determined following a fairness hearing set for June 14, Selna said. The settlement resolves the economic-loss portion of the Toyota sudden-acceleration litigation.

Class, or group, actions were filed on behalf of Toyota owners who contended the company drove down the value of their vehicles by failing to disclose or fix defects.

Selna yesterday granted preliminary certification of the Toyota owners as a class action, for settlement purposes only and contingent on final approval of the agreement.

The cases were combined in a multidistrict litigation before Selna, who is also handling the federal personal injury and death suits. Lawsuits claiming personal injuries and deaths caused by such incidents remain pending, with the first federal trial set for February in Santa Ana.

10 Million
The company, based in Toyota City, Japan, recalled more than 10 million vehicles for problems related to unintended acceleration in 2009 and 2010, starting with a September 2009 announcement that it was recalling 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles because of a defect that may cause floor mats to jam accelerator pedals. The company later recalled vehicles over defects involving the pedals themselves.

Toyota has paid $66.2 million in fines to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for how some of the recalls were conducted. The company last month agreed to pay $25.5 million to settle an investor lawsuit claiming Toyota’s alleged failure to disclose information on unintended acceleration problems caused the stock to plunge in 2010.

“We are gratified that Judge Selna has granted his preliminary approval of the settlement, which will provide value to Toyota customers and provides an added measure of confidence in our vehicles,” Julie Hamp, Toyota’s U.S. chief communications officer, said yesterday by e-mail.

‘Swift’ Approval
The “swift preliminary approval” will allow notices about how to participate in the settlement to be mailed in March to current and former Toyota owners, Steve Berman, co-lead plaintiffs’ lawyer, said in a statement issued yesterday by his law firm Seattle-based Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

Toyota announced Dec. 26 it would take a writedown of $1.1 million to cover the cost of the settlement. The total value of the settlement may reach $1.4 billion, including as much as $200 million in attorneys’ fees, lawyers for the plaintiffs said.

Under the settlement, Toyota will install a brake override system in more than 3 million vehicles that were subject to floor mat entrapment recalls, provide a fund of $250 million for former Toyota owners who sold their cars from Sept. 2, 2009, to Dec. 31, 2010, and provide an additional $250 million to current Toyota owners whose vehicles aren’t eligible for brake- overrides, according to yesterday’s Hagens Berman statement.

Court Approval
Toyota will pay as much as $200 million in fees and $27 million in costs to plaintiffs’ lawyers, pending final court approval, according to the Dec. 26 settlement filing.

Toyota didn’t admit to any defects in its vehicles or any wrongdoing in the settlement.

Toyota’s $1.1 billion writedown also covers an agreement in principle to resolve a lawsuit brought by the district attorney of Orange County, California, against Toyota, Hamp said Dec. 26. The Orange County suit claimed violations of consumer-protection laws through the sale of allegedly defective vehicles.

The writedown includes an agreement to settle a multistate investigation by attorneys general in the U.S., Hamp said.

The case is In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, 8:10-ml-02151, U.S. District Court, Central District of (Santa Ana).

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Toyota wins preliminary approval of recall accord

Toyota Motor and lawyers suing the company persuaded a judge to give preliminary approval to a $1.1 billion settlement of claims that recalls for unintended acceleration hurt the value of US customers’ vehicles. The terms of the settlement filed December 26 are “fair, reasonable and adequate,” US District Judge James V Selna in Santa Ana, California, said yesterday in granting preliminary approval.

and lawyers suing the company persuaded a judge to give to a $1.1 billion settlement of claims that recalls for unintended acceleration hurt the value of US customers’ vehicles. The terms of the settlement filed December 26 are “fair, reasonable and adequate,” US District in Santa Ana, California, said yesterday in granting preliminary approval. Final approval will be determined following a fairness hearing set for June 14, Selna said. The settlement resolves the economic-loss portion of the Toyota sudden-acceleration litigation.

Class, or group, actions were filed on behalf of Toyota owners who contended the company drove down the value of their vehicles by failing to disclose or fix defects.

Selna yesterday granted preliminary certification of the Toyota owners as a class action, for settlement purposes only and contingent on final approval of the agreement.

The cases were combined in a multidistrict litigation before Selna, who is also handling the federal personal injury and death suits. Lawsuits claiming personal injuries and deaths caused by such incidents remain pending, with the first federal trial set for February in Santa Ana.

10 Million
The company, based in Toyota City, Japan, recalled more than 10 million vehicles for problems related to unintended acceleration in 2009 and 2010, starting with a September 2009 announcement that it was recalling 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles because of a defect that may cause floor mats to jam accelerator pedals. The company later recalled vehicles over defects involving the pedals themselves.

Toyota has paid $66.2 million in fines to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for how some of the recalls were conducted. The company last month agreed to pay $25.5 million to settle an investor lawsuit claiming Toyota’s alleged failure to disclose information on unintended acceleration problems caused the stock to plunge in 2010.

“We are gratified that Judge Selna has granted his preliminary approval of the settlement, which will provide value to Toyota customers and provides an added measure of confidence in our vehicles,” Julie Hamp, Toyota’s U.S. chief communications officer, said yesterday by e-mail.

‘Swift’ Approval
The “swift preliminary approval” will allow notices about how to participate in the settlement to be mailed in March to current and former Toyota owners, Steve Berman, co-lead plaintiffs’ lawyer, said in a statement issued yesterday by his law firm Seattle-based Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

Toyota announced Dec. 26 it would take a writedown of $1.1 million to cover the cost of the settlement. The total value of the settlement may reach $1.4 billion, including as much as $200 million in attorneys’ fees, lawyers for the plaintiffs said.

Under the settlement, Toyota will install a brake override system in more than 3 million vehicles that were subject to floor mat entrapment recalls, provide a fund of $250 million for former Toyota owners who sold their cars from Sept. 2, 2009, to Dec. 31, 2010, and provide an additional $250 million to current Toyota owners whose vehicles aren’t eligible for brake- overrides, according to yesterday’s Hagens Berman statement.

Court Approval
Toyota will pay as much as $200 million in fees and $27 million in costs to plaintiffs’ lawyers, pending final court approval, according to the Dec. 26 settlement filing.

Toyota didn’t admit to any defects in its vehicles or any wrongdoing in the settlement.

Toyota’s $1.1 billion writedown also covers an agreement in principle to resolve a lawsuit brought by the district attorney of Orange County, California, against Toyota, Hamp said Dec. 26. The Orange County suit claimed violations of consumer-protection laws through the sale of allegedly defective vehicles.

The writedown includes an agreement to settle a multistate investigation by attorneys general in the U.S., Hamp said.

The case is In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, 8:10-ml-02151, U.S. District Court, Central District of (Santa Ana).

image
Business Standard
177 22
Widgets Magazine

More News

Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard