ALSO READBabri Masjid dispute: BJP creates row to get votes in Ram's name, says Cong SC decision on Ayodhya title dispute must be 'acceptable by all': Congress Ayodhya-Babri dispute: Key litigants not part of final hearing in SC Ayodhya-Babri case hearing: All you need to know about the dispute Babri dispute: There was no trace of Ram temple, revealed British accounts
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S.
Abdul Nazeerrefused appellants' plea for day to day hearing, saying "over 700 poor litigants are waiting for justice, we have to hear them".
Posting the next hearing for March 14, it asked parties in the case to file translated copies of the documents before it.
The court was hearing a batch of cross petitions challenging 2010 Allahabad High Court verdict that had divided the disputed Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi site between the Nirmohi Akhara, Lord Ram deity and the Sunni Waqf Board.
The top court was moved challenging the High Court verdict by petitioners M. Siddiqui represented by his legal heirs, the Nirmohi Akhara, the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board, Bhagwan Shri Ram Virajman, All India Hindu Mahasabha's Swami Chakrapani, the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha, the Akhil Bharatiya Sri Ramjanam Bhoomi Punardhar Samiti and others.