You are here: Home » Current Affairs » News » National
Business Standard

Delhi nursery admission: Judge refuses to hear case due to school-going son

The counsel said they have no objection if he hears the case

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

delhi, high court, delhi high court, delhi HC, HC,
Delhi High Court

Stating that he has a school- going son, a High Court judge on Friday recused from hearing petitions against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government's norms for 2017-18 session and remained unmoved despite the counsel saying they have no objection if he hears the case.

"I have a difficulty today. I cannot hear this matter. I have a school going son," Justice V K Rao said. The counsel in the matter, however, said they too have school going children.

The counsel for government also said that they do not mind if this bench itself hears the issue.

Justice Rao said keeping in view the urgency of the matter, it will be listed before some other bench on Friday itself.

On Thursday, another bench of the high court had pulled up the AAP government for coming out with norms at the "eleventh hour" which has not only caused "chaos and confusion" but also wasted "valuable" judicial time.

Two groups representing private unaided schools have challenged a condition in the letter allotting DDA land to them under which admissions have been restricted to the locality where these institutions are situated.

The two school bodies and some parents have also challenged the government's norms which enforces the clause in the DDA allotment letter, thereby restricting admission in these institutions located on DDA land to their respective neighbourhoods.

The Action Committee of Unaided Recognised Private Schools and Forum for Promotion of Quality Education, who have moved the court, argued that the neighbourhood restriction was"not reasonable".

They said that under the Right to Education Act of 2009, 25 per cent of the seats were reserved in private unaided schools for children belonging to poorer sections of society and disadvantaged groups who lived in the neighbourhood.

It said that ever since this reservation under the Act has come into force, it "supersedes and subsumes within it" all prior contractual and other agreements, including the DDA allotment letter.

"So there is no harking back to any letter of allotment," they contended.

The parents have said that while they were not concerned with the terms of the allotment letter, they were opposed to government's decision as it restricted their choice or right to decide where to send their children for study.

"This choice or right cannot be restricted by an executive order," they said.

Meanwhile, government has said that by a circular of January 9, they have extended that last date for submission of applications to January 31 from January 23.

The admission process had started from January 2.

Two ninety-eight private unaided schools on DDA land were affected by the guidelines which state that such institutes "shall not refuse admission to the residents of the locality".

Defining what neighbourhood would mean, the guidelines say that students residing within one km of the school will be preferred and if seats are not filled, preference will be given to students residing within 1-3 kilometres of the school.

"Students residing beyond 6 kilometres shall be admitted only in case vacancies remain unfilled even after considering all the students within 6 km area," as per the guidelines.

The first list of selected candidates, including those on the wait list, along with marks allotted under the point system, will be announced by schools on February 15, as per the admission schedule released by the government.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Delhi nursery admission: Judge refuses to hear case due to school-going son

The counsel said they have no objection if he hears the case

The counsel said they have no objection if he hears the case
Stating that he has a school- going son, a High Court judge on Friday recused from hearing petitions against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government's norms for 2017-18 session and remained unmoved despite the counsel saying they have no objection if he hears the case.

"I have a difficulty today. I cannot hear this matter. I have a school going son," Justice V K Rao said. The counsel in the matter, however, said they too have school going children.

The counsel for government also said that they do not mind if this bench itself hears the issue.

Justice Rao said keeping in view the urgency of the matter, it will be listed before some other bench on Friday itself.

On Thursday, another bench of the high court had pulled up the AAP government for coming out with norms at the "eleventh hour" which has not only caused "chaos and confusion" but also wasted "valuable" judicial time.

Two groups representing private unaided schools have challenged a condition in the letter allotting DDA land to them under which admissions have been restricted to the locality where these institutions are situated.

The two school bodies and some parents have also challenged the government's norms which enforces the clause in the DDA allotment letter, thereby restricting admission in these institutions located on DDA land to their respective neighbourhoods.

The Action Committee of Unaided Recognised Private Schools and Forum for Promotion of Quality Education, who have moved the court, argued that the neighbourhood restriction was"not reasonable".

They said that under the Right to Education Act of 2009, 25 per cent of the seats were reserved in private unaided schools for children belonging to poorer sections of society and disadvantaged groups who lived in the neighbourhood.

It said that ever since this reservation under the Act has come into force, it "supersedes and subsumes within it" all prior contractual and other agreements, including the DDA allotment letter.

"So there is no harking back to any letter of allotment," they contended.

The parents have said that while they were not concerned with the terms of the allotment letter, they were opposed to government's decision as it restricted their choice or right to decide where to send their children for study.

"This choice or right cannot be restricted by an executive order," they said.

Meanwhile, government has said that by a circular of January 9, they have extended that last date for submission of applications to January 31 from January 23.

The admission process had started from January 2.

Two ninety-eight private unaided schools on DDA land were affected by the guidelines which state that such institutes "shall not refuse admission to the residents of the locality".

Defining what neighbourhood would mean, the guidelines say that students residing within one km of the school will be preferred and if seats are not filled, preference will be given to students residing within 1-3 kilometres of the school.

"Students residing beyond 6 kilometres shall be admitted only in case vacancies remain unfilled even after considering all the students within 6 km area," as per the guidelines.

The first list of selected candidates, including those on the wait list, along with marks allotted under the point system, will be announced by schools on February 15, as per the admission schedule released by the government.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Delhi nursery admission: Judge refuses to hear case due to school-going son

The counsel said they have no objection if he hears the case

Stating that he has a school- going son, a High Court judge on Friday recused from hearing petitions against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government's norms for 2017-18 session and remained unmoved despite the counsel saying they have no objection if he hears the case.

"I have a difficulty today. I cannot hear this matter. I have a school going son," Justice V K Rao said. The counsel in the matter, however, said they too have school going children.

The counsel for government also said that they do not mind if this bench itself hears the issue.

Justice Rao said keeping in view the urgency of the matter, it will be listed before some other bench on Friday itself.

On Thursday, another bench of the high court had pulled up the AAP government for coming out with norms at the "eleventh hour" which has not only caused "chaos and confusion" but also wasted "valuable" judicial time.

Two groups representing private unaided schools have challenged a condition in the letter allotting DDA land to them under which admissions have been restricted to the locality where these institutions are situated.

The two school bodies and some parents have also challenged the government's norms which enforces the clause in the DDA allotment letter, thereby restricting admission in these institutions located on DDA land to their respective neighbourhoods.

The Action Committee of Unaided Recognised Private Schools and Forum for Promotion of Quality Education, who have moved the court, argued that the neighbourhood restriction was"not reasonable".

They said that under the Right to Education Act of 2009, 25 per cent of the seats were reserved in private unaided schools for children belonging to poorer sections of society and disadvantaged groups who lived in the neighbourhood.

It said that ever since this reservation under the Act has come into force, it "supersedes and subsumes within it" all prior contractual and other agreements, including the DDA allotment letter.

"So there is no harking back to any letter of allotment," they contended.

The parents have said that while they were not concerned with the terms of the allotment letter, they were opposed to government's decision as it restricted their choice or right to decide where to send their children for study.

"This choice or right cannot be restricted by an executive order," they said.

Meanwhile, government has said that by a circular of January 9, they have extended that last date for submission of applications to January 31 from January 23.

The admission process had started from January 2.

Two ninety-eight private unaided schools on DDA land were affected by the guidelines which state that such institutes "shall not refuse admission to the residents of the locality".

Defining what neighbourhood would mean, the guidelines say that students residing within one km of the school will be preferred and if seats are not filled, preference will be given to students residing within 1-3 kilometres of the school.

"Students residing beyond 6 kilometres shall be admitted only in case vacancies remain unfilled even after considering all the students within 6 km area," as per the guidelines.

The first list of selected candidates, including those on the wait list, along with marks allotted under the point system, will be announced by schools on February 15, as per the admission schedule released by the government.

image
Business Standard
177 22