ALSO READEvery writer has fundamental right to speak: Supreme Court SC seeks replies from Centre, EC on amendments in political funding law When NOTA suited you, you did not come, says SC as it refuses Congress plea SC to Centre: Why no law for appointment of ECs in poll panel? Supreme Court tells Tamil Nadu govt to book those agitating over NEET
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a plea seeking a direction to the poll panel to nullify an election result and conduct fresh poll if NOTA gets the maximum votes in a constituency.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud allowed the petitioner to withdraw the plea which had also sought a direction to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to restrict those candidates and political parties, whose election has been nullified, from taking part in fresh polls.
The apex court termed the suggestions as "unworkable" and said "we cannot destroy our democracy just like that... holding an election in our country is a very serious and expensive business. Today we cannot say that unless a person gets 51 per cent of votes, he cannot be declared elected."
Sensing the mood of the court favouring dismissing the plea, petitioner advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, also a Delhi BJP spokesperson, chose to withdraw the petition.
The petition had also said the right to reject and elect a new candidate will give power to the people to express their discontent.
The Right to Reject was first proposed by the Law Commission in its 170th report in 1999 as part of its 'Alternative Method of Election'. It had also suggested that the contesting candidates should be declared elected only if they have obtained 51 per cent of all valid votes.
The PIL wanted the Union government to implement the Law Commission recommendations to ensure free and fair polls.