Business Standard

F1 race on, but want 25% ticket sales reserved: SC

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Supreme court
  • ALSO READ

    SC directs BSES to clear dues

    SAT tells Sahara firms to pay Rs 24k cr in six weeks

    Orissa to oppose Gopalkrishnan committee's recommendations

    Supreme Court asks labour courts to note 'emerging economic order'

    Iron ore e-auctions: High prices dater major steel mills

The today cleared the decks for the in Greater Noida, stipulating that the organisers would deposit 25% of sale proceeds from tickets in a separate account which would not be operated without its permission.

A bench of justices DK Jain and AR Dave in an interim order directed that the amount would be subject to the final outcome of a plea challenging tax exemptions accorded to the organisers of the Formula 1 race.

The apex court rejected the arguments of the organisers that the direction would act as a dampener and cause adverse publicity since it was an international event.

"How can it be a dampener or cause adverse publicity we do not understand?," the bench remarked while passing the order.

F1 race on, but want 25% ticket sales reserved: SC

The Supreme Court today cleared the decks for the Formula 1 race in Greater Noida, stipulating that the organisers would deposit 25% of sale proceeds from tickets in a separate account which would not be operated without its permission.

The today cleared the decks for the in Greater Noida, stipulating that the organisers would deposit 25% of sale proceeds from tickets in a separate account which would not be operated without its permission.

A bench of justices DK Jain and AR Dave in an interim order directed that the amount would be subject to the final outcome of a plea challenging tax exemptions accorded to the organisers of the Formula 1 race.

The apex court rejected the arguments of the organisers that the direction would act as a dampener and cause adverse publicity since it was an international event.

"How can it be a dampener or cause adverse publicity we do not understand?," the bench remarked while passing the order.

image
Advertisement