You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News » BS Special
Business Standard

India-Japan defence ties are soaring but high-profile deals unlikely

The US-2i aircraft and the Soryu class project are indicative of a structural limitation in the India-Japan defence relationship

Abhijit Singh 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe press a button at the groundbreaking ceremony for a high-speed rail project in Ahmedabad.	Photo: Reuters
File photo: Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe

The India-Japan defence relationship is soaring, but high-profile deals like the and class submarines are unlikely to come to fruition anytime soon, argues this writer in today's BS Special.
 
Japan Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's visit to New Delhi last week evoked much enthusiasm in India’s strategic community. From defence and dual-use technologies to counter-terrorism, connectivity, infrastructure creation in the Northeast, and a willingness to cooperate in Asia and Africa, India and Japan took their bilateral cooperation forward in a number of crucial areas, aligning New Delhi’s Act East Policy with Japan’s 'Free and Open Asia-Pacific Strategy' in the Indo-Pacific.


The developing synergy in the nautical commons was deemed an especially notable aspect of the warming While maritime engagement with Japan has risen steadily over the years — the Malabar joint exercise, its most visible manifestation — rarely has India gone beyond flagging freedom of navigation, overflight and unimpeded lawful commerce in maritime-Asia. 

The emphasis on a “rules-based order” in the joint statement this time was seen as a reflection of the two countries’ willingness to combine forces in the Asian littorals. Even though it did not mention the South China Sea, the bilateral communiqué underscored the importance of peaceful resolution of disputes, in accordance with the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Yet, progress on two critical fronts continues to be elusive. Despite the sense of anticipation in the run-up to Abe’s arrival in New Delhi last week, India and Japan failed to reach an agreement on the amphibious They also seemed to have ducked a discussion on the transfer of critical undersea technologies and underwater platforms, particularly the sale of Japanese class submarines to India. Both areas merit a closer look.


The deal for the has been hanging fire since 2014 when Indian officials raised objections about the platforms high cost. At $133 million apiece, the was deemed expensive by Indian negotiators, leading to much bureaucratic resistance in clearing the proposal. The Indian Navy was keen to buy only two planes in the flyaway condition, insisting on license production for the rest — a demand Tokyo felt was both unviable and impractical. Notwithstanding the initial euphoria of a potential deal with India, therefore, negotiations grounded to a halt.

The proposal for the US-2i was revived in November 2016 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Tokyo, partly because Japan agreed to lower the price of the by 10 per cent. Delhi was hopeful that the license production of the would impart momentum to the 'Make in India' initiative, as also lend credibility to the Indian Navy’s operational plans to counter growing Chinese presence in the Indian Ocean. 

Beyond geopolitical considerations, however, Delhi and Tokyo realised that the US-2i deal had come to so symbolise India-Japanese strategic cooperation and its failure would be deemed a setback for the bilateral relationship.

What wasn’t accounted for, however, was the aircraft’s limited capacity to play a strategic role in India’s maritime neighbourhood. Unlike the P-8i’s maritime reconnaissance plane and combat capabilities, the US-2i’s utility is restricted to a long-distance search and rescue role. While the does carry out limited surface-surveillance and sealift, it lacks the weapons and sensors required for strategic reconnaissance and combat missions. The aircraft’s benign mission profile, however, played no role in shaping the political narrative surrounding the platform, which assumed a momentum of its own.


On the eve of Abe’s visit, reports in the Indian media suggested New Delhi had decided to procure 12 in the flyaway condition, with a follow-on contract for 18 planes to be license produced in India. The news surprised India’s maritime watchers who were at pains to explain how the Navy's projected requirement for search and rescue operations in the Indian Ocean had suddenly doubled. Mercifully, the huge costs involved — a cumulative price of over $1.3 billion for 12 — seemed to have induced a rethink in the Indian camp, leading to a temporary freeze in negotiations.

With the class too, the prospects for a deal look bleak. The is one of the world’s most sophisticated diesel-electric submarines, with a large size to weight ratio, capability for heavier weapon load, excellent stealth features and AIP technology. 

While Tokyo has always been secretive about its premier submarine’s design, its reasons for evading Delhi’s ‘feelers’ for a possible sale go beyond the desire for proprietary control. The is suited to favour longer patrols and operational flexibility — features that aren’t particularly relevant to the Indian Navy’s need, which is confined to near-seas littoral patrolling. 


More important for Tokyo, however, is the fact that the does not offer any significant commercial advantage, especially with Indian industry’s limited capacity for high-technology absorption and a less than perfect track record of co-production.

New Delhi’s complex procurement procedures and fickle ship-construction practices add a further complication. A new-comer in defence trade, Japan is far from adept in forging partnerships with the domestic industry. Japanese constructors fear that the integration of domestically produced Indian equipment on the might undermine the project. They also believe co-production with Indian industry could damage their reputation for timely delivery, especially if critical fitments outsourced to Indian firms are delayed, or if additional changes are forced on the original platform design.

The and the class project are indicative of a structural limitation in the India-Japan defence relationship. While the two proposals symbolise warming bilateral ties, they cater neither to New Delhi’s operational needs nor Tokyo’s commercial expectations. Maritime pundits in both countries must not view these as a barometer of the developing strategic partnership.


Abhijit Singh is Head of the Maritime Policy Program at the Observer Research Foundation and a former naval officer. He tweets at @abhijit227

Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal. They do not reflect the view/s of Business Standard.

First Published: Wed, September 20 2017. 11:39 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU