You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » Q&A
Business Standard

'Investors don't want terms to change after they've invested in country'

Saritha Nayyar, chief operating officer of WEF, also calls for creating agricultural clusters to facilitate more players in the food processing sector

Subhayan Chakraborty 

Saritha Nayyar, chief operating officer of the World Economic Forum (WEF).
Saritha Nayyar, chief operating officer of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

In Delhi to attend the 33rd Economic Summit, Saritha Nayyar, chief operating officer of the (WEF), tells Subhayan Chakraborty that retrospective changes in laws and investment norms continue to bother investors. She also calls for creating agricultural clusters to facilitate more players in the sector. Edited excerpts:

Have flagged any issues about investing in

Firstly, for the foreign direct investment, investors need to have some level of comfort that if they come into the country, the terms are not going to change afterwards. This includes rules, laws or decisions that were made in the past. Also, you don’t want to find out after making an investment, that it is not allowed.

did not see a major rise in the latest global competitiveness report by the What are the reasons for this?
has actually performed very well in certain indicators.  It has been able to maintain its position after the large jump in rankings in the previous year. Efforts by the government towards reform have been noted in areas such as ease of doing business. However, there has to be similar ease of business in terms of removing corruption. Also, evasion has to be reduced.

The government is looking to leverage India’s strengths in the sector. Since you have spent many years in the industry, what are the challenges that you see so far?

The is doing a lot of work in the whole food and agriculture value chain space. As part of the ongoing summit, we have had a meeting with officials of agriculture departments of 12 state governments. Officials from the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of were present as well. We have had discussions on the ways to drive in agriculture, which may lead to increase in farmers incomes.

How exactly can incomes be raised?

This is within the broader context of the government’s aim of doubling farmers incomes by 2022. While everybody talks about increasing agricultural productivity, it hasn’t led to a rise in farmers’ incomes. So, within that broad area, there have to be products that are moving up the value chain, that get the inputs at the right cost as well as receive access to markets. That’s where comes in, as there are challenges around cold chains and logistics. So, the conversation is around what the government can do to create an enabling environment for private in areas such land use.

And what are the steps the government needs to take, according to you?

If the private sector is going to invest, the question is whether they will get a return. But, they can’t really do it if they have very small pieces of land. Today, I understand it is around an average 17 hectares of land that any company can have, so the question is how to create agricultural clusters with multiple farmers, thereby creating larger plots of land. Then again, around creating market opportunities by leveraging technology and giving farmers the access to information related to pricing so that intermediaries can be removed.

What is your opinion of the mega reforms— and

I appreciate the bold reforms taken by the government. I don’t feel that with incremental steps, we can turn the tide in such a large nation. 

First Published: Sun, October 15 2017. 00:33 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU