Business Standard

Japan offers lessons, but N-power vital: Jairam

BS Reporter  |  New Delhi 

Even as protest against the proposed nuclear power plant in Maharashtra’s Jaitapur, Union Environment Minister on Wednesday said India could not afford to hit the “rewind button” and abandon nuclear energy, which presently accounts for three per cent of the country’s energy generation.

Jairam RameshOn Jaitapur, in particular, the minister said, “As far as ground level seismicity is concerned, I think those factors have been taken into account.” Adding, however, “I don’t think in Jaitapur a probability has been taken into account.”

Yet, he said, there can be no going back on nuclear energy. “Today, nuclear power accounts for about three per cent of our energy. Our objective is that we should aim at about six per cent by 2020 and 13 per cent by 2030. From a climate change point of view, it is the best source because it does not have any greenhouse gas emission,” he said on the sidelines of a conference here today.

However, he added, “It is natural in a post-Japan era to be cautious.”

“We need to look at our safety systems, at our safeguards, at our radioactive waste management but I don’t think India can abandon the nuclear option.”

On additional safeguards, he said: “I am waiting for the technical review being carried out by the Ltd. Based on the safety review, we will decide whether additional studies need to be done.”

Ramesh noted Jaitapur was off the Arabian Sea and so was Bhavnagar. “The last that came on our west coast was in 1945. All these are probabilistic events. We have to take these into account factoring in our safeguards.”

He added that he would look at the power plants on coastal areas. “The in Japan is a wakeup call for us. For many years I believed there was no alternative to coastal locations to our power plants.”

“I think what has happened in Japan is of great concern,” Ramesh said, adding there should be no knee-jerk reaction. “We will need coastal locations, but we will also need to, in light of what has happened in Japan, need to relook at these issues without necessarily abandoning the principle that we need coastal locations.”

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Japan offers lessons, but N-power vital: Jairam

Even as environmental activists protest against the proposed nuclear power plant in Maharashtra’s Jaitapur, Union Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday said India could not afford to hit the “rewind button” and abandon nuclear energy, which presently accounts for three per cent of the country’s energy generation.

Even as protest against the proposed nuclear power plant in Maharashtra’s Jaitapur, Union Environment Minister on Wednesday said India could not afford to hit the “rewind button” and abandon nuclear energy, which presently accounts for three per cent of the country’s energy generation.

Jairam RameshOn Jaitapur, in particular, the minister said, “As far as ground level seismicity is concerned, I think those factors have been taken into account.” Adding, however, “I don’t think in Jaitapur a probability has been taken into account.”

Yet, he said, there can be no going back on nuclear energy. “Today, nuclear power accounts for about three per cent of our energy. Our objective is that we should aim at about six per cent by 2020 and 13 per cent by 2030. From a climate change point of view, it is the best source because it does not have any greenhouse gas emission,” he said on the sidelines of a conference here today.

However, he added, “It is natural in a post-Japan era to be cautious.”

“We need to look at our safety systems, at our safeguards, at our radioactive waste management but I don’t think India can abandon the nuclear option.”

On additional safeguards, he said: “I am waiting for the technical review being carried out by the Ltd. Based on the safety review, we will decide whether additional studies need to be done.”

Ramesh noted Jaitapur was off the Arabian Sea and so was Bhavnagar. “The last that came on our west coast was in 1945. All these are probabilistic events. We have to take these into account factoring in our safeguards.”

He added that he would look at the power plants on coastal areas. “The in Japan is a wakeup call for us. For many years I believed there was no alternative to coastal locations to our power plants.”

“I think what has happened in Japan is of great concern,” Ramesh said, adding there should be no knee-jerk reaction. “We will need coastal locations, but we will also need to, in light of what has happened in Japan, need to relook at these issues without necessarily abandoning the principle that we need coastal locations.”

image
Business Standard
177 22

Japan offers lessons, but N-power vital: Jairam

Even as protest against the proposed nuclear power plant in Maharashtra’s Jaitapur, Union Environment Minister on Wednesday said India could not afford to hit the “rewind button” and abandon nuclear energy, which presently accounts for three per cent of the country’s energy generation.

Jairam RameshOn Jaitapur, in particular, the minister said, “As far as ground level seismicity is concerned, I think those factors have been taken into account.” Adding, however, “I don’t think in Jaitapur a probability has been taken into account.”

Yet, he said, there can be no going back on nuclear energy. “Today, nuclear power accounts for about three per cent of our energy. Our objective is that we should aim at about six per cent by 2020 and 13 per cent by 2030. From a climate change point of view, it is the best source because it does not have any greenhouse gas emission,” he said on the sidelines of a conference here today.

However, he added, “It is natural in a post-Japan era to be cautious.”

“We need to look at our safety systems, at our safeguards, at our radioactive waste management but I don’t think India can abandon the nuclear option.”

On additional safeguards, he said: “I am waiting for the technical review being carried out by the Ltd. Based on the safety review, we will decide whether additional studies need to be done.”

Ramesh noted Jaitapur was off the Arabian Sea and so was Bhavnagar. “The last that came on our west coast was in 1945. All these are probabilistic events. We have to take these into account factoring in our safeguards.”

He added that he would look at the power plants on coastal areas. “The in Japan is a wakeup call for us. For many years I believed there was no alternative to coastal locations to our power plants.”

“I think what has happened in Japan is of great concern,” Ramesh said, adding there should be no knee-jerk reaction. “We will need coastal locations, but we will also need to, in light of what has happened in Japan, need to relook at these issues without necessarily abandoning the principle that we need coastal locations.”

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard