Retail FDI gets LS go-ahead

Govt wins vote as BSP, SP stage walkout battleground now shifts to Rajya Sabha

Aided by the absence of the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the United Progressive Alliance government on Wednesday won the Lok Sabha vote on allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, besides the enabling rules under the (Fema).

The final numbers showed 253 members of Parliament (MPs) voted in favour of the government decision on FDI, while 218 voted against it.

This was the first time an executive decision on had been voted upon. The victory, however, was seen more as numerical than ideological. Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj pointed out, of the 18 who spoke, 14 opposed in retail. “Going by their speeches, the numbers should actually translate into 282 against in retail and 224 in favour of it,” she said.



(with 22 MPs) and (with 21) staged a walkout ahead of the voting, bringing down the total number of present in the House to 502 and the halfway mark to 251. Of the 502 present, only 471 voted. As there were no abstentions, some chose not to vote. Though the Dravida Munnettra Kazhagam (DMK), a government ally, had yesterday said it was opposed to the decision to allow in retail, its were present in the House and voted on Wednesday.

After yesterday’s debate, the focus of the speeches from the government’s side on Wednesday was on how the move would help farmers. The Opposition’s contended in retail was not only bad for the country but there also wasn’t a parliamentary consensus on it.

Replying to the debate, Commerce Minister said the policy was a guiding policy and it was up to states to accept or reject it. “No one can tell an elected government what to choose and what not to,” he said.

THE WAY FORWARD
  • Rajya Sabha: The debate now moves to the upper House, where debate starts on Thursday and voting is expected on Friday
  • Foreign chains: If the retail policy is safe after the vote, foreign chains will start strategising on their India plans
  • Headway may take time: Go-ahead in Parliament may not translate into rush of foreign money into India, either from existing or new players, as they would wait for the general economy to improve and for more states in India to allow foreign-owned chains

The policy allows retailers to set up outlets with foreign investment only in those cities that have more than one million population. Though 53 cities in the country meet the population criterion, only 18 of those fall under the 10 states and Union Territories that have agreed to permit in multi-brand retail.

He countered the charge of not taking stakeholders on board despite a commitment by former finance minister, now the President, Pranab Mukherjee. “After December 7, we spoke to farmers’ bodies again. Twelve such bodies were called and what they said we have in writing. Consumer forums were also called and consulted and 17 of those and six bodies of food processing industries gave us their views in writing.” The government had also sent letters to all chief ministers after which 11 states were in favour, seven opposed and three states asked for further clarifications, he added. All of these were contradicted by the Opposition.

While the enabling change under Fema would still be open to amendment by till the expiry of the mandatory 30-day period, the will take up the issue tomorrow, after which the House is expected to vote on Friday.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

Retail FDI gets LS go-ahead

Govt wins vote as BSP, SP stage walkout battleground now shifts to Rajya Sabha

BS Reporter  |  New Delhi 



Aided by the absence of the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the United Progressive Alliance government on Wednesday won the Lok Sabha vote on allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, besides the enabling rules under the (Fema).

The final numbers showed 253 members of Parliament (MPs) voted in favour of the government decision on FDI, while 218 voted against it.

This was the first time an executive decision on had been voted upon. The victory, however, was seen more as numerical than ideological. Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj pointed out, of the 18 who spoke, 14 opposed in retail. “Going by their speeches, the numbers should actually translate into 282 against in retail and 224 in favour of it,” she said.



(with 22 MPs) and (with 21) staged a walkout ahead of the voting, bringing down the total number of present in the House to 502 and the halfway mark to 251. Of the 502 present, only 471 voted. As there were no abstentions, some chose not to vote. Though the Dravida Munnettra Kazhagam (DMK), a government ally, had yesterday said it was opposed to the decision to allow in retail, its were present in the House and voted on Wednesday.

After yesterday’s debate, the focus of the speeches from the government’s side on Wednesday was on how the move would help farmers. The Opposition’s contended in retail was not only bad for the country but there also wasn’t a parliamentary consensus on it.

Replying to the debate, Commerce Minister said the policy was a guiding policy and it was up to states to accept or reject it. “No one can tell an elected government what to choose and what not to,” he said.

THE WAY FORWARD
  • Rajya Sabha: The debate now moves to the upper House, where debate starts on Thursday and voting is expected on Friday
  • Foreign chains: If the retail policy is safe after the vote, foreign chains will start strategising on their India plans
  • Headway may take time: Go-ahead in Parliament may not translate into rush of foreign money into India, either from existing or new players, as they would wait for the general economy to improve and for more states in India to allow foreign-owned chains

The policy allows retailers to set up outlets with foreign investment only in those cities that have more than one million population. Though 53 cities in the country meet the population criterion, only 18 of those fall under the 10 states and Union Territories that have agreed to permit in multi-brand retail.

He countered the charge of not taking stakeholders on board despite a commitment by former finance minister, now the President, Pranab Mukherjee. “After December 7, we spoke to farmers’ bodies again. Twelve such bodies were called and what they said we have in writing. Consumer forums were also called and consulted and 17 of those and six bodies of food processing industries gave us their views in writing.” The government had also sent letters to all chief ministers after which 11 states were in favour, seven opposed and three states asked for further clarifications, he added. All of these were contradicted by the Opposition.

While the enabling change under Fema would still be open to amendment by till the expiry of the mandatory 30-day period, the will take up the issue tomorrow, after which the House is expected to vote on Friday.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Retail FDI gets LS go-ahead

Govt wins vote as BSP, SP stage walkout battleground now shifts to Rajya Sabha

Aided by the absence of the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the United Progressive Alliance government on Wednesday won the Lok Sabha vote on allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, besides the enabling rules under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (Fema).

Aided by the absence of the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the United Progressive Alliance government on Wednesday won the Lok Sabha vote on allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, besides the enabling rules under the (Fema).

The final numbers showed 253 members of Parliament (MPs) voted in favour of the government decision on FDI, while 218 voted against it.

This was the first time an executive decision on had been voted upon. The victory, however, was seen more as numerical than ideological. Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj pointed out, of the 18 who spoke, 14 opposed in retail. “Going by their speeches, the numbers should actually translate into 282 against in retail and 224 in favour of it,” she said.



(with 22 MPs) and (with 21) staged a walkout ahead of the voting, bringing down the total number of present in the House to 502 and the halfway mark to 251. Of the 502 present, only 471 voted. As there were no abstentions, some chose not to vote. Though the Dravida Munnettra Kazhagam (DMK), a government ally, had yesterday said it was opposed to the decision to allow in retail, its were present in the House and voted on Wednesday.

After yesterday’s debate, the focus of the speeches from the government’s side on Wednesday was on how the move would help farmers. The Opposition’s contended in retail was not only bad for the country but there also wasn’t a parliamentary consensus on it.

Replying to the debate, Commerce Minister said the policy was a guiding policy and it was up to states to accept or reject it. “No one can tell an elected government what to choose and what not to,” he said.

THE WAY FORWARD
  • Rajya Sabha: The debate now moves to the upper House, where debate starts on Thursday and voting is expected on Friday
  • Foreign chains: If the retail policy is safe after the vote, foreign chains will start strategising on their India plans
  • Headway may take time: Go-ahead in Parliament may not translate into rush of foreign money into India, either from existing or new players, as they would wait for the general economy to improve and for more states in India to allow foreign-owned chains

The policy allows retailers to set up outlets with foreign investment only in those cities that have more than one million population. Though 53 cities in the country meet the population criterion, only 18 of those fall under the 10 states and Union Territories that have agreed to permit in multi-brand retail.

He countered the charge of not taking stakeholders on board despite a commitment by former finance minister, now the President, Pranab Mukherjee. “After December 7, we spoke to farmers’ bodies again. Twelve such bodies were called and what they said we have in writing. Consumer forums were also called and consulted and 17 of those and six bodies of food processing industries gave us their views in writing.” The government had also sent letters to all chief ministers after which 11 states were in favour, seven opposed and three states asked for further clarifications, he added. All of these were contradicted by the Opposition.

While the enabling change under Fema would still be open to amendment by till the expiry of the mandatory 30-day period, the will take up the issue tomorrow, after which the House is expected to vote on Friday.

image
Business Standard
177 22

More News

  • Foreign investors make a strong comeback Invest Rs 10 cr, be a permanent resident of India
  • GDP growth in line with expectations
Widgets Magazine

Widgets Magazine

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard