Sanction of prosecution is an administrative function

Taxing Matters

 These sections deal with various offences relateable to the compliance under the Act like failure to furnish return of income, giving of false statement in verification and the wilful attempt to evade tax.

 Questions often raised in the context of prosecution under these sections had been whether the chief commissioner or the director-general should hear the parties against whom prosecution was to be launched before according sanction for prosecution.

 The Supreme Court recently considered this issue in the Assistant Commissioner vs Velliappa Textiles Ltd case, (2003) 132 Taxman 165 (SC). According to the Supreme Court, there is nothing new in Section 279.

 There are similar provisions in many other statues, which put an embargo on the court

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

Sanction of prosecution is an administrative function

Taxing Matters

T N Pandey  |  New Delhi 

 These sections deal with various offences relateable to the compliance under the Act like failure to furnish return of income, giving of false statement in verification and the wilful attempt to evade tax.

 Questions often raised in the context of prosecution under these sections had been whether the chief commissioner or the director-general should hear the parties against whom prosecution was to be launched before according sanction for prosecution.

 The Supreme Court recently considered this issue in the Assistant Commissioner vs Velliappa Textiles Ltd case, (2003) 132 Taxman 165 (SC). According to the Supreme Court, there is nothing new in Section 279.

 There are similar provisions in many other statues, which put an embargo on the court

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Sanction of prosecution is an administrative function

Taxing Matters

Section 279 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 provides that a person shall not be prosecuted for an offence under Sections 275A, 275B, 276, 276A, 276B, 276BB, 276C, 276CC, 276D, 277 and 278 of the Act  These sections deal with various offences relateable to the compliance under the Act like failure to furnish return of income, giving of false statement in verification and the wilful attempt to evade tax.

 Questions often raised in the context of prosecution under these sections had been whether the chief commissioner or the director-general should hear the parties against whom prosecution was to be launched before according sanction for prosecution.

 The Supreme Court recently considered this issue in the Assistant Commissioner vs Velliappa Textiles Ltd case, (2003) 132 Taxman 165 (SC). According to the Supreme Court, there is nothing new in Section 279.

 There are similar provisions in many other statues, which put an embargo on the court
image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard