You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » News
Business Standard

Telcos seek to defer IUC review to next financial year

Unlike others Reliance Jio Infocomm and Reliance Communications have suggested that the charges should be brought down to zero at the earliest

Kiran Rathee  |  New Delhi 

Trai increases mobile Internet data packs validity to 1-year from 90 days

The review of interconnect usage charges (IUC), initiated by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), has divided the telecom industry with the incumbents calling for a deferment of the exercise till April next year, while Infocomm and Reliance Communications have suggested that the charges should be brought down to zero at the earliest.

In its written comments submitted to Trai, the GSM industry body Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has asked the regulator to defer the review of till April 2017. Telecom operators, including Bharti Airtel, Vodafone and Idea Cellular have sought to defer the review till the original timeline of FY18.


Interconnect charges are paid by a telecom operator to another when its call terminates on the latter’s network. Currently, the charges are 14 paise per minute for wireless calls, but has sought comments from stakeholders on reviewing these charges. had said the current interconnect regime was implemented by the regulator in March 2015 and it was clearly stated in 2015 that the next review would be held in 2017-18.

“It is therefore critical that the review should not be held at this stage and be deferred by some months, that is, after end March 2017… By such time there will be more clarity on several issues,” said in its latest submission to Trai.

The industry body further said that proposed fixed mobile telephony service of and internet telephony could not be trigger for initiation of the consultation.

said the reasons for an early review of were not substantial enough and the exercise seems to have been carried out in haste and should be undertaken only in the next financial year.

had extended the date for receiving comments on the paper twice. After two extensions, the regulator fixed October 17 as deadline for comments. The discussion paper, which came out on August 5, created a flutter in the telecom sector with calling “biased against incumbents”.

had termed the paper unfair and alleged that the authority’s exercise was aimed at “hurting the financial and operational viability of existing operators.” Regarding the questions asked in the paper, most of the incumbent operators have proposed cost-based principle, barring Jio and R-Com, which have supported the ‘bill and keep’ approach.

The cost-based model includes network operating costs, overhead costs, spectrum costs and capital costs, and these, as per incumbent operators including Airtel, Vodafone, Idea, and Telenor, should form the basis of determining the charges. However, Jio and R-Com suggested to bring down the charges to zero and proposed adoption of ‘bill and keep’ method. Under ‘bill and keep’ regime, the originating operator bills its customers, keeps all revenue with itself, without sharing it and does not pay any amount for the termination of calls.

“We believe that an or MTC (mobile termination charge) exercise when conducted should be based on a comprehensive costing review… the results of 2014, 2015 spectrum auctions were not factored in by the authority in 2015 calculation,” the submission said.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Telcos seek to defer IUC review to next financial year

Unlike others Reliance Jio Infocomm and Reliance Communications have suggested that the charges should be brought down to zero at the earliest

Unlike others Reliance Jio Infocomm and Reliance Communications have suggested that the charges should be brought down to zero at the earliest
The review of interconnect usage charges (IUC), initiated by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), has divided the telecom industry with the incumbents calling for a deferment of the exercise till April next year, while Infocomm and Reliance Communications have suggested that the charges should be brought down to zero at the earliest.

In its written comments submitted to Trai, the GSM industry body Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has asked the regulator to defer the review of till April 2017. Telecom operators, including Bharti Airtel, Vodafone and Idea Cellular have sought to defer the review till the original timeline of FY18.

Interconnect charges are paid by a telecom operator to another when its call terminates on the latter’s network. Currently, the charges are 14 paise per minute for wireless calls, but has sought comments from stakeholders on reviewing these charges. had said the current interconnect regime was implemented by the regulator in March 2015 and it was clearly stated in 2015 that the next review would be held in 2017-18.

“It is therefore critical that the review should not be held at this stage and be deferred by some months, that is, after end March 2017… By such time there will be more clarity on several issues,” said in its latest submission to Trai.

The industry body further said that proposed fixed mobile telephony service of and internet telephony could not be trigger for initiation of the consultation.

said the reasons for an early review of were not substantial enough and the exercise seems to have been carried out in haste and should be undertaken only in the next financial year.

had extended the date for receiving comments on the paper twice. After two extensions, the regulator fixed October 17 as deadline for comments. The discussion paper, which came out on August 5, created a flutter in the telecom sector with calling “biased against incumbents”.

had termed the paper unfair and alleged that the authority’s exercise was aimed at “hurting the financial and operational viability of existing operators.” Regarding the questions asked in the paper, most of the incumbent operators have proposed cost-based principle, barring Jio and R-Com, which have supported the ‘bill and keep’ approach.

The cost-based model includes network operating costs, overhead costs, spectrum costs and capital costs, and these, as per incumbent operators including Airtel, Vodafone, Idea, and Telenor, should form the basis of determining the charges. However, Jio and R-Com suggested to bring down the charges to zero and proposed adoption of ‘bill and keep’ method. Under ‘bill and keep’ regime, the originating operator bills its customers, keeps all revenue with itself, without sharing it and does not pay any amount for the termination of calls.

“We believe that an or MTC (mobile termination charge) exercise when conducted should be based on a comprehensive costing review… the results of 2014, 2015 spectrum auctions were not factored in by the authority in 2015 calculation,” the submission said.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Telcos seek to defer IUC review to next financial year

Unlike others Reliance Jio Infocomm and Reliance Communications have suggested that the charges should be brought down to zero at the earliest

The review of interconnect usage charges (IUC), initiated by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), has divided the telecom industry with the incumbents calling for a deferment of the exercise till April next year, while Infocomm and Reliance Communications have suggested that the charges should be brought down to zero at the earliest.

In its written comments submitted to Trai, the GSM industry body Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has asked the regulator to defer the review of till April 2017. Telecom operators, including Bharti Airtel, Vodafone and Idea Cellular have sought to defer the review till the original timeline of FY18.

Interconnect charges are paid by a telecom operator to another when its call terminates on the latter’s network. Currently, the charges are 14 paise per minute for wireless calls, but has sought comments from stakeholders on reviewing these charges. had said the current interconnect regime was implemented by the regulator in March 2015 and it was clearly stated in 2015 that the next review would be held in 2017-18.

“It is therefore critical that the review should not be held at this stage and be deferred by some months, that is, after end March 2017… By such time there will be more clarity on several issues,” said in its latest submission to Trai.

The industry body further said that proposed fixed mobile telephony service of and internet telephony could not be trigger for initiation of the consultation.

said the reasons for an early review of were not substantial enough and the exercise seems to have been carried out in haste and should be undertaken only in the next financial year.

had extended the date for receiving comments on the paper twice. After two extensions, the regulator fixed October 17 as deadline for comments. The discussion paper, which came out on August 5, created a flutter in the telecom sector with calling “biased against incumbents”.

had termed the paper unfair and alleged that the authority’s exercise was aimed at “hurting the financial and operational viability of existing operators.” Regarding the questions asked in the paper, most of the incumbent operators have proposed cost-based principle, barring Jio and R-Com, which have supported the ‘bill and keep’ approach.

The cost-based model includes network operating costs, overhead costs, spectrum costs and capital costs, and these, as per incumbent operators including Airtel, Vodafone, Idea, and Telenor, should form the basis of determining the charges. However, Jio and R-Com suggested to bring down the charges to zero and proposed adoption of ‘bill and keep’ method. Under ‘bill and keep’ regime, the originating operator bills its customers, keeps all revenue with itself, without sharing it and does not pay any amount for the termination of calls.

“We believe that an or MTC (mobile termination charge) exercise when conducted should be based on a comprehensive costing review… the results of 2014, 2015 spectrum auctions were not factored in by the authority in 2015 calculation,” the submission said.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard