Trader bodies threaten to intensify protests

Various traders’ associations held protests on Tuesday through the country against the proposed opening of India’s retail sector to foreign investment, threatening to campaign against the Congress-led UPA government ahead of the Assembly elections in five states next year.

“Our national core will assess the situation and will continue the protests, even if that means campaigning against the government”, said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general, Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT). They’re seeking a meeting with Commerce Minister to discuss the matter.

His ministry is finalising a note on allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail for the Union Cabinet. The traders protesting on Tuesday called it a disregard for parliamentary procedure.

“On June 8, 2009, when the parliamentary standing committee headed by recommended a blanket ban on multinational corporations and big corporate houses into retail trade, that report was not put to discussion,” argued Khandelwal.

“Conversely, in the case of bringing the Lokpal Bill, the government says it first wants proper discussion in Parliament and the standing committee.” Opposition parties have asked for discussion on FDI in multi-brand retail during Parliament’s current session. According to CAIT, allowing FDI in multibrand retail will see predatory pricing by foreign brands and a fading out of traditional kirana stores, as the foreign majors would have the margins to sell at a loss initially.

“After wiping out the local retailers, they will sell at a higher price,” said a trader.

said the existing retail structure could be upgraded with technology and innovation.

“We are ready for a positive change. We can become organised without bringing in foreign brands,” Khandelwal said.

Bhartiya Udyog Vyapar Mandal, another traders’ association, is planning countrywide processions next week against the proposed move.

In July, a committee of Union government secretaries recommended allowing up to 51 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail, but with several riders, including mandatory sourcing from the small-scale sector.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

Trader bodies threaten to intensify protests

BS Reporter  |  New Delhi 



Various traders’ associations held protests on Tuesday through the country against the proposed opening of India’s retail sector to foreign investment, threatening to campaign against the Congress-led UPA government ahead of the Assembly elections in five states next year.

“Our national core will assess the situation and will continue the protests, even if that means campaigning against the government”, said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general, Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT). They’re seeking a meeting with Commerce Minister to discuss the matter.

His ministry is finalising a note on allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail for the Union Cabinet. The traders protesting on Tuesday called it a disregard for parliamentary procedure.

“On June 8, 2009, when the parliamentary standing committee headed by recommended a blanket ban on multinational corporations and big corporate houses into retail trade, that report was not put to discussion,” argued Khandelwal.

“Conversely, in the case of bringing the Lokpal Bill, the government says it first wants proper discussion in Parliament and the standing committee.” Opposition parties have asked for discussion on FDI in multi-brand retail during Parliament’s current session. According to CAIT, allowing FDI in multibrand retail will see predatory pricing by foreign brands and a fading out of traditional kirana stores, as the foreign majors would have the margins to sell at a loss initially.

“After wiping out the local retailers, they will sell at a higher price,” said a trader.

said the existing retail structure could be upgraded with technology and innovation.

“We are ready for a positive change. We can become organised without bringing in foreign brands,” Khandelwal said.

Bhartiya Udyog Vyapar Mandal, another traders’ association, is planning countrywide processions next week against the proposed move.

In July, a committee of Union government secretaries recommended allowing up to 51 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail, but with several riders, including mandatory sourcing from the small-scale sector.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Trader bodies threaten to intensify protests

Various traders’ associations held protests on Tuesday through the country against the proposed opening of India’s retail sector to foreign investment, threatening to campaign against the Congress-led UPA government ahead of the Assembly elections in five states next year.

Various traders’ associations held protests on Tuesday through the country against the proposed opening of India’s retail sector to foreign investment, threatening to campaign against the Congress-led UPA government ahead of the Assembly elections in five states next year.

“Our national core will assess the situation and will continue the protests, even if that means campaigning against the government”, said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general, Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT). They’re seeking a meeting with Commerce Minister to discuss the matter.

His ministry is finalising a note on allowing foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail for the Union Cabinet. The traders protesting on Tuesday called it a disregard for parliamentary procedure.

“On June 8, 2009, when the parliamentary standing committee headed by recommended a blanket ban on multinational corporations and big corporate houses into retail trade, that report was not put to discussion,” argued Khandelwal.

“Conversely, in the case of bringing the Lokpal Bill, the government says it first wants proper discussion in Parliament and the standing committee.” Opposition parties have asked for discussion on FDI in multi-brand retail during Parliament’s current session. According to CAIT, allowing FDI in multibrand retail will see predatory pricing by foreign brands and a fading out of traditional kirana stores, as the foreign majors would have the margins to sell at a loss initially.

“After wiping out the local retailers, they will sell at a higher price,” said a trader.

said the existing retail structure could be upgraded with technology and innovation.

“We are ready for a positive change. We can become organised without bringing in foreign brands,” Khandelwal said.

Bhartiya Udyog Vyapar Mandal, another traders’ association, is planning countrywide processions next week against the proposed move.

In July, a committee of Union government secretaries recommended allowing up to 51 per cent FDI in multi-brand retail, but with several riders, including mandatory sourcing from the small-scale sector.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Widgets Magazine

More News

Widgets Magazine

Widgets Magazine

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard