You are here: Home » Economy & Policy » Q&A

We didn't want Inspector Raj with dual-control situation: Amit Mitra

Interview with Finance minister, West Bengal

Finance Minister Amit Mitra said on Friday that the decision to exempt those with annual turnover of less than Rs 20 lakh would protect the interest of smaller traders. Speaking to reporters after the Council meeting in New Delhi, Mitra also said that by agreeing to state control below the threshold of Rs 1.5 crore, an Inspector Raj situation was avoided. Excerpts:

The Council decided on exemptions for turnover below Rs 10 lakh per annum for north-eastern and hilly states, and Rs 20 lakh for the rest of the country. What is the thinking behind it?

This is a big relief. We were able to protect the interest of small traders, small manufacturers and laying out of initial path of (goods and services tax). There is wide variation among states on the current VAT (value-added tax) threshold. The Council agreed at Rs 20 lakh threshold, which means any dealer who has a turnover of less than Rs 20 lakh will not be part of the net. This gives a huge relief to small businesses of India and West Bengal. In West Bengal, a total of 138,000 business will not be paying out of a total pool of 265,000. The VAT limit currently varies from state to state. For West Bengal, the limit is currently Rs 10 lakh; for it is Rs 5 lakh; and it is only Rs 1 lakh in northeastern states.

The issue of dual control seems to have been resolved. But, there was also a compromise from states in that the Centre will continue to assess 1.1 million service-taxpayers.

States have prevailed in dual control. We are charging VAT and sales and we continue with that. I'm very pleased that the Union government has accepted Rs 1.5 crore. This shows cooperative federalism.

We’ve protected the core group with whom we work today. Above Rs 1.5 crore turnover, there is already dual control. We will logically define a way to have mutually acceptable method for control. Below Rs 1.5 crore, you should not have control. These businesses should not face audit by both the Centre and states. We did not want Inspector Raj. Only states would be involved in working with taxpayers like small traders and shop keepers. Small manufacturers will not face dual control in GST.

On service tax, only the Centre the currently and so it is felt that this levy should go to it only for the initial period. Once state officials are trained, it would go to states.

What further deliberations took place today?

Rules for have been set in motion and compensation to states have also been defined. For compensating states, three alternatives have been discussed. First, a state can be compensated if the revenue under falls short of the average earnings in the best three years out of the past five years. Second, of the five years, two outliers are left out and the average is taken. If the revenue under is short of this, then states get compensated. Third, a base year can be fixed and a particular growth rate decided for all states. If the revenue falls short of that, then the state gets compensated.

The base year for calculating compensation has been agreed as 2015-16 and an average of five years will be taken. If for some reasons the base year becomes 2016-17, then the average would be taken for six years. These three ideas will be discussed by the officers and the Council will take a call.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

We didn't want Inspector Raj with dual-control situation: Amit Mitra

Interview with Finance minister, West Bengal

Dilasha Seth & Arup Roychoudhury 

We didn't want Inspector Raj with dual-control situation: Amit Mitra

Finance Minister Amit Mitra said on Friday that the decision to exempt those with annual turnover of less than Rs 20 lakh would protect the interest of smaller traders. Speaking to reporters after the Council meeting in New Delhi, Mitra also said that by agreeing to state control below the threshold of Rs 1.5 crore, an Inspector Raj situation was avoided. Excerpts:

The Council decided on exemptions for turnover below Rs 10 lakh per annum for north-eastern and hilly states, and Rs 20 lakh for the rest of the country. What is the thinking behind it?



This is a big relief. We were able to protect the interest of small traders, small manufacturers and laying out of initial path of (goods and services tax). There is wide variation among states on the current VAT (value-added tax) threshold. The Council agreed at Rs 20 lakh threshold, which means any dealer who has a turnover of less than Rs 20 lakh will not be part of the net. This gives a huge relief to small businesses of India and West Bengal. In West Bengal, a total of 138,000 business will not be paying out of a total pool of 265,000. The VAT limit currently varies from state to state. For West Bengal, the limit is currently Rs 10 lakh; for it is Rs 5 lakh; and it is only Rs 1 lakh in northeastern states.

The issue of dual control seems to have been resolved. But, there was also a compromise from states in that the Centre will continue to assess 1.1 million service-taxpayers.

States have prevailed in dual control. We are charging VAT and sales and we continue with that. I'm very pleased that the Union government has accepted Rs 1.5 crore. This shows cooperative federalism.

We’ve protected the core group with whom we work today. Above Rs 1.5 crore turnover, there is already dual control. We will logically define a way to have mutually acceptable method for control. Below Rs 1.5 crore, you should not have control. These businesses should not face audit by both the Centre and states. We did not want Inspector Raj. Only states would be involved in working with taxpayers like small traders and shop keepers. Small manufacturers will not face dual control in GST.

On service tax, only the Centre the currently and so it is felt that this levy should go to it only for the initial period. Once state officials are trained, it would go to states.

What further deliberations took place today?

Rules for have been set in motion and compensation to states have also been defined. For compensating states, three alternatives have been discussed. First, a state can be compensated if the revenue under falls short of the average earnings in the best three years out of the past five years. Second, of the five years, two outliers are left out and the average is taken. If the revenue under is short of this, then states get compensated. Third, a base year can be fixed and a particular growth rate decided for all states. If the revenue falls short of that, then the state gets compensated.

The base year for calculating compensation has been agreed as 2015-16 and an average of five years will be taken. If for some reasons the base year becomes 2016-17, then the average would be taken for six years. These three ideas will be discussed by the officers and the Council will take a call.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

We didn't want Inspector Raj with dual-control situation: Amit Mitra

Interview with Finance minister, West Bengal

Interview with Finance minister, West Bengal Finance Minister Amit Mitra said on Friday that the decision to exempt those with annual turnover of less than Rs 20 lakh would protect the interest of smaller traders. Speaking to reporters after the Council meeting in New Delhi, Mitra also said that by agreeing to state control below the threshold of Rs 1.5 crore, an Inspector Raj situation was avoided. Excerpts:

The Council decided on exemptions for turnover below Rs 10 lakh per annum for north-eastern and hilly states, and Rs 20 lakh for the rest of the country. What is the thinking behind it?

This is a big relief. We were able to protect the interest of small traders, small manufacturers and laying out of initial path of (goods and services tax). There is wide variation among states on the current VAT (value-added tax) threshold. The Council agreed at Rs 20 lakh threshold, which means any dealer who has a turnover of less than Rs 20 lakh will not be part of the net. This gives a huge relief to small businesses of India and West Bengal. In West Bengal, a total of 138,000 business will not be paying out of a total pool of 265,000. The VAT limit currently varies from state to state. For West Bengal, the limit is currently Rs 10 lakh; for it is Rs 5 lakh; and it is only Rs 1 lakh in northeastern states.

The issue of dual control seems to have been resolved. But, there was also a compromise from states in that the Centre will continue to assess 1.1 million service-taxpayers.

States have prevailed in dual control. We are charging VAT and sales and we continue with that. I'm very pleased that the Union government has accepted Rs 1.5 crore. This shows cooperative federalism.

We’ve protected the core group with whom we work today. Above Rs 1.5 crore turnover, there is already dual control. We will logically define a way to have mutually acceptable method for control. Below Rs 1.5 crore, you should not have control. These businesses should not face audit by both the Centre and states. We did not want Inspector Raj. Only states would be involved in working with taxpayers like small traders and shop keepers. Small manufacturers will not face dual control in GST.

On service tax, only the Centre the currently and so it is felt that this levy should go to it only for the initial period. Once state officials are trained, it would go to states.

What further deliberations took place today?

Rules for have been set in motion and compensation to states have also been defined. For compensating states, three alternatives have been discussed. First, a state can be compensated if the revenue under falls short of the average earnings in the best three years out of the past five years. Second, of the five years, two outliers are left out and the average is taken. If the revenue under is short of this, then states get compensated. Third, a base year can be fixed and a particular growth rate decided for all states. If the revenue falls short of that, then the state gets compensated.

The base year for calculating compensation has been agreed as 2015-16 and an average of five years will be taken. If for some reasons the base year becomes 2016-17, then the average would be taken for six years. These three ideas will be discussed by the officers and the Council will take a call.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard