You are here: Home » International » News » Economy
Business Standard

Herd of 'grey rhinos' threatens economy in China

The grey rhinos have a common characteristic: A lot of debt and many deals

Keith Bradsher & Sui-Lee Wee | NYT  |  Shanghai 

One-hundred Yuan notes are seen in this picture illustration in Beijing
One-hundred Yuan notes are seen in this picture illustration in Beijing

Let the West worry about the so-called black swans, rare and unexpected events that can upset financial markets. is more concerned about “grey rhinos” — large and visible problems in the that are ignored until they start moving fast.
 
The rhinos are a herd of Chinese tycoons who have used a combination of political connections and raw ambition to create sprawling global conglomerates. Companies like Anbang Insurance Group, Fosun International, HNA Group and Dalian Wanda Group have feasted on cheap debt provided by state banks, spending lavishly to build their empires.

 
Such players are now so big, so complex, so indebted and so enmeshed in the that the Chinese government is abruptly bringing them to heel. President Xi Jinping recently warned that financial stability is crucial to national security, while the official newspaper of the Communist Party pointed to the dangers of a “grey rhinoceros,” without naming specific companies.

Deal making in China has skyrocketed in the past few years, as Chinese firms look beyond their borders. The spending spree has been funded by debt, prompting regulators to scrutinise aggressive acquirors
Deal making in has skyrocketed in the past few years, as Chinese firms look beyond their borders. The spending spree has been funded by debt, prompting regulators to scrutinise aggressive acquirors

 
Chinese regulators have become increasingly concerned that some of the biggest conglomerates have borrowed so much that they could pose risks to the financial system. Banking officials are ramping up scrutiny of companies’ balance sheets.
 
The turnabout for the first generation of post-Mao Chinese capitalists, once seen as exemplars of the country’s ingenuity and economic prowess, has been swift. Last year, the chairman of Anbang, a fast-growing insurer that paid $2 billion for the Waldorf Astoria in New York, held court at the luxurious hotel, wining and dining American business leaders. Last month, the chairman, Wu Xiaohui, was detained by the Chinese police, for undisclosed reasons.
 
Fosun, run by a professed “Warren Buffett of China,” made multibillion-dollar deals for Club Med, Cirque du Soleil and other brands. The company was recently forced to deny speculation that its chairman, Guo Guangchang, who was briefly held by officials in 2015 for unknown reasons, was in custody again.
 
Founded as a regional airline, HNA evolved into a powerhouse, with stakes in Hilton Hotels, Deutsche Bank and the airport ground services company Swissport. European regulators are scrutinising the conglomerate, while one big Wall Street bank, Bank of America, has decided not to do business with HNA.
 
Dalian Wanda went head-to-head with American entertainment giants, promising a year ago to defeat Disney in Now, the Chinese company is in retreat, selling off its theme parks and hotels.
 
“The downside of these new companies is that there was no one with the political or regulatory strength who could control these companies,” said Brock Silvers, the chief executive of Kaiyuan Capital, a boutique investment banking advisory service in Shanghai.
 
The have a common characteristic: A lot of debt and many deals.
 
For years, China’s banks readily doled out loans, eager to keep pumping money into the They doubled down after the global financial crisis in 2008, to prop up growth and push down the value of the currency.
 
The conglomerates, with their stellar reputations and strong profits, were at the front of the lending line. HNA has secured a $90 billion credit line from state-controlled banks. Anbang spent more than $10 billion in three years, deals that were financed mostly by selling so-called wealth management products — opaque investments promising high rates and low risk.
 
With state money in hand, companies looked beyond their borders, at the urging of the government. Over the past five years, Wanda, Anbang, HNA and Fosun have made at least $41 billion of overseas acquisitions, according to Dealogic, a research firm.
 
The country’s debt levels soared. In 2011, total credit extended to private, non-financial companies was about 120 per cent of economic output in It is now 166 per cent.
 
“The Chinese government played the role of an indispensable enabler,” said Minxin Pei, a professor at Claremont McKenna College in California who studies Chinese politics. “If you look at how they got so big, it’s all through taking on debt.” By 2015, China’s was losing steam. And the government, which had been looking for ways to reinvest all the dollars pouring into the country, suddenly needed to prevent all the money from flowing out. Beijing had to dip deep into its pockets to keep the currency from sinking.
 
The government started taking a closer look at the most prolific deal makers. In December, four big Chinese regulators, in a rare joint statement, warned about “irrational” investments in overseas real estate, entertainment and sports, calling the areas rife with “risks and hidden dangers.” Some of the conglomerates’ purchases appeared to fit that description.
 
Wanda paid a hefty $3.5 billion last year for Legendary Entertainment. The studio had produced blockbusters like 300 and Godzilla only to follow with flops like Warcraft and The Great Wall. Fosun bought Britain’s Wolverhampton Wanderers Football Club. It was among a number of Chinese deals for soccer teams, including AC Milan, Inter Milan and FC Sochaux.
 
Anbang was in a protracted battle for the Starwood hotel chain, bidding up the price and drawing scrutiny. It eventually walked away from Starwood, which Marriott purchased for $13 billion.
 
In recent months, the political and regulatory environment has quickly shifted. Chinese officials have also become preoccupied with preventing any disruption to the Communist Party’s next congress, where the leadership is selected every five years. In the lead-up to the event this fall, the government is putting a premium on stability.
 
©2017 The New York Times News Service

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU