You are here: Home » International » News » Others
Business Standard

The music business is more unfair than ever

Streaming apps revived the industry, but record labels collect the profits

Leonid Bershidsky | Bloomberg 

A music creator earns $1 from 58 hours of streaming video on YouTube. Photo: iSTOCK
A music creator earns $1 from 58 hours of streaming video on YouTube. Photo: iSTOCK

The is booming and it’s doing so thanks to streaming. But the tech pioneers who made this possible in the last two years aren’t making any money, and neither, really, are musicians: It’s legacy businesses — the music companies that own the catalogues — that are collecting all the profits. Something has to give.
 
The (RIAA) reports that US retail music sales were up 17 per cent year-over-year in the first six months of 2017, to $4 billion. That’s still very far from the industry’s revenues at the height of the compact disc boom in 2000, but it’s spectacular for this decade. Streaming is running behind this achievement: In just two years, it’s grown from 33 per cent to 62 per cent of the market.

 
Yet the market leader, Spotify, is still unprofitable after posting an operating loss of $412.3 million in 2016. Pandora, another beneficiary of the streaming boom, posted 10 per cent year-over-year revenue growth in the three months to June but dramatically increased its net loss to $125.8 million from $76.3 million. For Tidal, founded by rapper Jay-Z and now part-owned by Sprint, no profit is in sight. It’s unclear how much Apple and Alphabet make from their streaming services because the companies don’t break out these results, but they probably would do so if the services were profitable.
 
Like at the dawn of streaming, musicians are still complaining that it’s next to impossible to make money from it. The has calculated that a music creator only earns $1 from 58 hours of streaming video on YouTube — the company most often blamed for the “value gap” that plagues artists. Other industry leaders are more generous, but that’s not saying much. On average, an artist earns $100 for 152,094 streams of a song to That’s dismal; you have to be extremely popular before you can earn enough for food.
 
Only the oligopoly of record labels that control the intellectual property — Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, — are reaping profits from the boom. posted a record profit in the three months to June; no wonder it now controls one of the world’s top streaming services, Deezer, which once planned to go public. At Sony, music is one of the strongest profit drivers. UMG consistently provides most of the profit of its corporate parent, Vivendi.
 
In its recent forecast for the music industry, Goldman Sachs predicts that record labels’ share of the music industry’s revenue will increase by 133 per cent between 2015 and 2030, while the share that goes to musicians, venues and tour organisers will only grow by 60 per cent. So the investment bank expects the labels to continue reaping a disproportionate share of the benefits.
 
It’s unfair. Streaming services don’t just provide the content delivery mechanism the way, say, a CD factory does. They curate the content and, in effect, keep and manage our music collections for us.
© Bloomberg

First Published: Tue, September 26 2017. 22:38 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU