New Document top_band
 
Business Standard

Funds quit race to launch public sector ETF

Of the 6 mutual funds which had evinced interest, only 2 made presentations before the inter-ministerial group on Monday

Mutual Fundr image via Shutterstock
Related News

Various have opted out of the race to bid for a mandate to launch exchange-traded funds (ETFs) consisting of state-owned companies, due to the requirements.

Of the six MFs which had evinced interest in offering this product, only two made presentations before the Inter-Ministerial Group at the department of disinvestment (DoD) today, for the mandate to create and launch the so-called Central Public Sector Enterprise (CPSE) ETF, according to sources.

Goldman Sachs Asset Management and UTI MF were the two fund houses that made presentations, said a person in the know.

A UTI official confirmed this. Goldman Sachs did not respond to phone calls or a text query. The other four which had planned to join the race were , , and .

The proposed would be a basket of shares comprising listed public sector undertaking (PSU) stocks.

“The proposed CPSE ETF will serve as an additional mechanism for the government to monetise its shareholdings in those CPSEs that eventually form part of the ETF basket,” said the Request for Proposal (RFP) floated by the DoD for creation of the ETF.

Fund houses have been reluctant because they would have to pay upfront a marketing expense fee of Rs 15 crore, which officials say is too high.

Fund house officials said it did not make business sense to incur expenditure of that magnitude for a New Fund Offer (NFO) period of just 15-20 days. An NFO for an equity-oriented scheme is about Rs 7-8 crore, while for an ETF it is Rs 2-3 crore, they said.

“It is up to a fund house to decide how much they would want to spend on an NFO. But it would hurt an AMC’s business to spend that much on the product,” said Deepak Chatterjee, managing director, SBI MF.

MF sector sources said asset management companies had made an appeal to DoD to reduce the marketing expenses but the latter had said this would ensure only serious players came forward.

“A presentation to that effect was made during the pre-bid meetings with the fund houses but it was just an idea that was being floated around. We decided not to make any changes to the marketing expenses,” said a department official, who did not wish to be named.

According to the RFP, the asset management company chosen would have to incur marketing expenses of Rs 15 crore for the promotion of the NFO. This would be in addition to the other expenses by the AMC with relation to the creation of the index for the ETF and the payment to the distributors, among others.

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Read More

More MF schemes to be merged as tax comes down

Effective June, STT to be brought down to 0.001 per cent

Quick Links

 

Market News

Margin pressure to continue for Hexaware

Even as it steps up investment & remains confident on top-line growth, weak margin outlook has led earnings downgrade

Identifying multi-baggers

Just one multi-bagger (MB) can turn an otherwise mediocre portfolio into an excellent one. While such stocks are not very common, there are ...

Facing the heat

The Budget decision to increase long-term capital gains tax from 10 per cent to 20 per cent, and increase the tenure of its applicability from ...

Forward trades to begin on commexes

NCDEX gets okay to start with maize & sugar, hopes to add more; NMCE likely to follow

Karnataka doubles grape output in 7 yrs

Area touches 20,400 hectares in 2013-14 compared to 9,700 hectares in 2007-08

Back to Top