SC scanner on Sebi's rejection of NSDL report

With the calling for explanations, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) may come to regret its decision on the Ltd (NSDL) matter. In 2009, the board had rejected a report by a two-member committee indicting NSDL in the Initial Public Offer scam.

was Sebi chairman and head of NSDL at the time of the IPO decisions. He had recused from the proceedings when Sebi took the decision, but there was considerable controversy when the report was rejected.

On Monday, replying to a notice from the apex court, Attorney-General Goolam E Vahanvati said the market regulator’s board had, in an April 26 meeting, decided to reconsider the special committee’s report, that had indeed found NSDL to be at fault. With the matter gathering steam, a letter written by to the Prime Minister’s Office in December last year has also come into focus. The letter surfaced after a (RTI) application was filed in March. It has some damning allegations about the way the NSDL investigation was conducted.

Gopal was part of the committee formed by Sebi to oversee the conduct of proceedings against NSDL. He has mentioned four structural issues in the letter — inadequate transparency, public accountability and parliamentary oversight, lack of protection against conflict of interest, ineffective framework for law enforcement and outdated governance structure — which led to this “abuse of power”.

GRAVE CHARGES
He further alleged he was “threatened” when he objected to the “illegal and unethical actions” of the board. “An informal clique of current and serving bureaucrats, Sebi officials, lawyers and corporate interests orchestrated this subversion of the due process of law. They illegally interfered with an independent Sebi adjudication, manipulated legal opinion, suppressed and misrepresented facts and misled the Sebi board and government officials about the legality of the orders,” says the five-page letter.

In 2008, Sebi formed a two-member committee comprising Gopal and V Leeladhar, former RBI deputy governor, to take over and dispose the then, ongoing quasi-judicial proceedings against NSDL. The committee was formed after Bhave recused himself from the proceedings against NSDL as he was its former chairman and managing director.

According to Gopal, currently director of the National Judicial Academy, Sebi’s stance on the NSDL matter took a U-turn after Bhave became the chairman. “...Every single investigation prior to Bhave joining Sebi had found failures in NSDL’s role under his (Bhave) leadership during the IPO scam. After Bhave took over, however, there has been a stunning reversal of Sebi enforcement actions against NSDL — all Sebi actions against NSDL in relation to the have been stopped, dropped or reversed,” it says, adding that “Sebi-under-Bhave” exonerated “NSDL-under-Bhave”. “The court can direct Sebi to set aside the earlier order,” said a securities lawyer.

The main problem, according to experts, was the setting aside of the final order given by the two committee members. “The two-member committee was not formed to give recommendations but pass the final orders. It was illegal on Sebi’s part to set it aside, as it is not bestowed with such powers. So the Supreme Court can say that what you did was illegal and set it aside,” he explained.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

SC scanner on Sebi's rejection of NSDL report

Ashish Rukhaiyar  |  Mumbai 



With the calling for explanations, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) may come to regret its decision on the Ltd (NSDL) matter. In 2009, the board had rejected a report by a two-member committee indicting NSDL in the Initial Public Offer scam.

was Sebi chairman and head of NSDL at the time of the IPO decisions. He had recused from the proceedings when Sebi took the decision, but there was considerable controversy when the report was rejected.

On Monday, replying to a notice from the apex court, Attorney-General Goolam E Vahanvati said the market regulator’s board had, in an April 26 meeting, decided to reconsider the special committee’s report, that had indeed found NSDL to be at fault. With the matter gathering steam, a letter written by to the Prime Minister’s Office in December last year has also come into focus. The letter surfaced after a (RTI) application was filed in March. It has some damning allegations about the way the NSDL investigation was conducted.

Gopal was part of the committee formed by Sebi to oversee the conduct of proceedings against NSDL. He has mentioned four structural issues in the letter — inadequate transparency, public accountability and parliamentary oversight, lack of protection against conflict of interest, ineffective framework for law enforcement and outdated governance structure — which led to this “abuse of power”.

GRAVE CHARGES
He further alleged he was “threatened” when he objected to the “illegal and unethical actions” of the board. “An informal clique of current and serving bureaucrats, Sebi officials, lawyers and corporate interests orchestrated this subversion of the due process of law. They illegally interfered with an independent Sebi adjudication, manipulated legal opinion, suppressed and misrepresented facts and misled the Sebi board and government officials about the legality of the orders,” says the five-page letter.

In 2008, Sebi formed a two-member committee comprising Gopal and V Leeladhar, former RBI deputy governor, to take over and dispose the then, ongoing quasi-judicial proceedings against NSDL. The committee was formed after Bhave recused himself from the proceedings against NSDL as he was its former chairman and managing director.

According to Gopal, currently director of the National Judicial Academy, Sebi’s stance on the NSDL matter took a U-turn after Bhave became the chairman. “...Every single investigation prior to Bhave joining Sebi had found failures in NSDL’s role under his (Bhave) leadership during the IPO scam. After Bhave took over, however, there has been a stunning reversal of Sebi enforcement actions against NSDL — all Sebi actions against NSDL in relation to the have been stopped, dropped or reversed,” it says, adding that “Sebi-under-Bhave” exonerated “NSDL-under-Bhave”. “The court can direct Sebi to set aside the earlier order,” said a securities lawyer.

The main problem, according to experts, was the setting aside of the final order given by the two committee members. “The two-member committee was not formed to give recommendations but pass the final orders. It was illegal on Sebi’s part to set it aside, as it is not bestowed with such powers. So the Supreme Court can say that what you did was illegal and set it aside,” he explained.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

SC scanner on Sebi's rejection of NSDL report

With the Supreme court calling for explanations, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) may come to regret its decision on the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) matter. In 2009, the Sebi board had rejected a report by a two-member committee indicting NSDL in the Initial Public Offer scam.

With the calling for explanations, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) may come to regret its decision on the Ltd (NSDL) matter. In 2009, the board had rejected a report by a two-member committee indicting NSDL in the Initial Public Offer scam.

was Sebi chairman and head of NSDL at the time of the IPO decisions. He had recused from the proceedings when Sebi took the decision, but there was considerable controversy when the report was rejected.

On Monday, replying to a notice from the apex court, Attorney-General Goolam E Vahanvati said the market regulator’s board had, in an April 26 meeting, decided to reconsider the special committee’s report, that had indeed found NSDL to be at fault. With the matter gathering steam, a letter written by to the Prime Minister’s Office in December last year has also come into focus. The letter surfaced after a (RTI) application was filed in March. It has some damning allegations about the way the NSDL investigation was conducted.

Gopal was part of the committee formed by Sebi to oversee the conduct of proceedings against NSDL. He has mentioned four structural issues in the letter — inadequate transparency, public accountability and parliamentary oversight, lack of protection against conflict of interest, ineffective framework for law enforcement and outdated governance structure — which led to this “abuse of power”.

GRAVE CHARGES
He further alleged he was “threatened” when he objected to the “illegal and unethical actions” of the board. “An informal clique of current and serving bureaucrats, Sebi officials, lawyers and corporate interests orchestrated this subversion of the due process of law. They illegally interfered with an independent Sebi adjudication, manipulated legal opinion, suppressed and misrepresented facts and misled the Sebi board and government officials about the legality of the orders,” says the five-page letter.

In 2008, Sebi formed a two-member committee comprising Gopal and V Leeladhar, former RBI deputy governor, to take over and dispose the then, ongoing quasi-judicial proceedings against NSDL. The committee was formed after Bhave recused himself from the proceedings against NSDL as he was its former chairman and managing director.

According to Gopal, currently director of the National Judicial Academy, Sebi’s stance on the NSDL matter took a U-turn after Bhave became the chairman. “...Every single investigation prior to Bhave joining Sebi had found failures in NSDL’s role under his (Bhave) leadership during the IPO scam. After Bhave took over, however, there has been a stunning reversal of Sebi enforcement actions against NSDL — all Sebi actions against NSDL in relation to the have been stopped, dropped or reversed,” it says, adding that “Sebi-under-Bhave” exonerated “NSDL-under-Bhave”. “The court can direct Sebi to set aside the earlier order,” said a securities lawyer.

The main problem, according to experts, was the setting aside of the final order given by the two committee members. “The two-member committee was not formed to give recommendations but pass the final orders. It was illegal on Sebi’s part to set it aside, as it is not bestowed with such powers. So the Supreme Court can say that what you did was illegal and set it aside,” he explained.

image
Business Standard
177 22

LIVE MARKET

BSE

  ( %)

NSE

  ( %)

More News

STOCK WATCH

Company Price() Chg(%)
Dish TV 102.90 9.58
IIFL Holdings 269.25 7.61
DCB Bank 111.00 6.88
Credit Analysis 1062.25 6.82
Eicher Motors 22465.80 6.60
> More on BSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
Dish TV 102.95 9.64
IIFL Holdings 267.65 7.21
DCB Bank 111.20 7.13
Eicher Motors 22460.85 6.45
Credit Analysis 1060.20 6.25
> More on NSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
JP Associates 12.13 -8.73
Religare Enterp. 256.20 -6.26
Star Ferro Cem. 115.85 -5.47
SPARC 357.15 -4.94
G S F C 69.95 -4.89
> More on BSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
JP Associates 12.10 -9.02
G S F C 69.85 -5.22
SPARC 356.95 -5.21
IL&FS Transport 73.45 -4.98
Castex Tech 13.90 -4.79
> More on NSE Gainers
Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine

Derivatives

Index
Instrument Type
Expiry Date
Option Type
Strike Price

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard