Business Standard

Sebi moves SC for early hearing in PACL case

N Sundaresha Subramanian  |  Mumbai 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has moved the Supreme Court for an early hearing in a seven-year case against realty player PACL India.

The market regulator had filed an affidavit earlier this month, saying the schemes of PACL were not being regulated by any statutory regulatory authority and posed a threat to investors. “Certain circumstances have arisen that merit early disposal of the case, as the fate of hundreds of thousands of small-time investors is at stake,” said in the affidavit.

In 2002, Sebi had held that PACL’s schemes came under (CIS) regulations and directed the company to comply with the relevant rules. In 2003, the Rajasthan High Court quashed the Sebi order. The regulator had challenged this in the apex court in 2004. But the case had not appeared in the court since 2006, according to investors. Meanwhile, PACL has continued its operations and has amassed deposits worth Rs 20,000 crore.

Business Standard has reviewed a copy of the affidavit, shared by Sebi with a delegation of investors led by Mumbai-based Investors and Consumer Guidance Society. Investors have been demanding action from Sebi as schemes of PACL continue to raise money from small investors and have grown manifold. They have also asked Sebi to include a prayer for an interim stay from the court. “We pointed out how the Supreme Court has clubbed the matters of PACL and another group firm PGFL. PGFL has been asked to stop raising money, whereas PACL continues to despite the modus operandi of both firms being same. Sebi officials have agreed to add prayers for an interim stay in the affidavit,” said an official of Investor and Consumer Guidance Society.

PACL collects subscriptions from investors and the funds are pooled and utilised towards cost of land, registration expenses, development charges and other incidental expenses. The investor is entitled to receive an “estimated realisable value” at the end of the term.

“Deposits have reportedly swollen to more than Rs 20,000 crore. The appellant submits that the activities of Respondent No 1 are in the nature of Collective Investment Schemes as defined under the Sebi Act. The respondent company defies being regulated, despite the fact that similar schemes already stand covered by the CIS regulations,” the regulator said.

The plea also referred to a July judgement of the Gwalior bench of the Madhya Pradesh high court. It had held several companies, including PACL, are fraudulently raising money and issued directions that these be closed. The court also recommended a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) enquiry into the money-raising activities of these firms.

“As the matter is sub judice, we would not like to comment on the issue,” a spokesperson for Limited said in an email response to a quarry.

The regulator said since all the ingredients of collective investment schemes are present in PACL schemes, they are not mere sale purchase transactions as claimed by the company.

“In case no action is taken now despite the fact (they are CIS).the company will continue to mobilise funds to the detriment of investors and without any regulation,” the affidavit said adding, “It is submitted that the interest of investors who have invested in Respondent No 1 are severely prejudiced for, if the company runs into bad weather there would be no resources for investors to fall back on.”

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Sebi moves SC for early hearing in PACL case

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has moved the Supreme Court for an early hearing in a seven-year case against realty player PACL India.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has moved the Supreme Court for an early hearing in a seven-year case against realty player PACL India.

The market regulator had filed an affidavit earlier this month, saying the schemes of PACL were not being regulated by any statutory regulatory authority and posed a threat to investors. “Certain circumstances have arisen that merit early disposal of the case, as the fate of hundreds of thousands of small-time investors is at stake,” said in the affidavit.

In 2002, Sebi had held that PACL’s schemes came under (CIS) regulations and directed the company to comply with the relevant rules. In 2003, the Rajasthan High Court quashed the Sebi order. The regulator had challenged this in the apex court in 2004. But the case had not appeared in the court since 2006, according to investors. Meanwhile, PACL has continued its operations and has amassed deposits worth Rs 20,000 crore.

Business Standard has reviewed a copy of the affidavit, shared by Sebi with a delegation of investors led by Mumbai-based Investors and Consumer Guidance Society. Investors have been demanding action from Sebi as schemes of PACL continue to raise money from small investors and have grown manifold. They have also asked Sebi to include a prayer for an interim stay from the court. “We pointed out how the Supreme Court has clubbed the matters of PACL and another group firm PGFL. PGFL has been asked to stop raising money, whereas PACL continues to despite the modus operandi of both firms being same. Sebi officials have agreed to add prayers for an interim stay in the affidavit,” said an official of Investor and Consumer Guidance Society.

PACL collects subscriptions from investors and the funds are pooled and utilised towards cost of land, registration expenses, development charges and other incidental expenses. The investor is entitled to receive an “estimated realisable value” at the end of the term.

“Deposits have reportedly swollen to more than Rs 20,000 crore. The appellant submits that the activities of Respondent No 1 are in the nature of Collective Investment Schemes as defined under the Sebi Act. The respondent company defies being regulated, despite the fact that similar schemes already stand covered by the CIS regulations,” the regulator said.

The plea also referred to a July judgement of the Gwalior bench of the Madhya Pradesh high court. It had held several companies, including PACL, are fraudulently raising money and issued directions that these be closed. The court also recommended a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) enquiry into the money-raising activities of these firms.

“As the matter is sub judice, we would not like to comment on the issue,” a spokesperson for Limited said in an email response to a quarry.

The regulator said since all the ingredients of collective investment schemes are present in PACL schemes, they are not mere sale purchase transactions as claimed by the company.

“In case no action is taken now despite the fact (they are CIS).the company will continue to mobilise funds to the detriment of investors and without any regulation,” the affidavit said adding, “It is submitted that the interest of investors who have invested in Respondent No 1 are severely prejudiced for, if the company runs into bad weather there would be no resources for investors to fall back on.”

image

LIVE MARKET

BSE

  ( %)

NSE

  ( %)

Widgets Magazine

More News

STOCK WATCH

Company Price() Chg(%)
Take Solutions 154.85 19.99
Vijaya Bank 34.30 15.88
Sequent Scien. 864.25 15.19
Jindal Steel 63.45 10.44
Yamini Invest 46.65 9.64
> More on BSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
Vijaya Bank 34.25 16.10
Federal-Mogul Go 339.10 12.06
Jindal Steel 63.50 10.63
Suzlon Energy 15.75 9.38
Lupin 1802.85 9.08
> More on NSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
SE Investments 181.10 -7.01
Alembic Pharma 596.55 -5.77
Crompton Greaves 126.90 -5.33
ISGEC Heavy 4484.50 -5.12
Bosch 16133.20 -4.97
> More on BSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
Alembic Pharma 593.20 -6.33
Bosch 16089.10 -5.24
Ess Dee Alumin. 165.15 -4.98
Zydus Wellness 700.00 -4.68
J B Chem & Pharm 256.95 -4.46
> More on NSE Gainers
Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine

Derivatives

Index
Instrument Type
Expiry Date
Option Type
Strike Price