Sebi to take re-look at front-running norms

Move comes after Securities Appellate Tribunal said regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) plans to review the regulations that govern front-running, to strengthen these, after a recent ruling by the (SAT) set aside its order on individuals on this count.

The tribunal overruled Sebi’s order on the grounds that the regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals.

“On this particular aspect of front-running, we will have to look at our regulations to see if it needs more improvement and strengthening,” said Chairman U K Sinha.

Front-running is an unethical practice of executing trades based on confidential information, to make profits. It is prohibited under Sebi’s Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (FUTP) Regulations.

In 2009, Sebi had passed an interim order that barred three individuals from the securities market and imposed penalties on them for their alleged front-running. An investigation had found and had traded on information from their cousin, Dipak Patel, who was working at Passport India Investment (Mauritius), on forthcoming trades by his organisation, to make a profit of Rs 1.56 crore.

Earlier this month, the order against these individuals was set aside by SAT.

The appellate body’s ruling that the FUTP Act cannot be applied for front-running by individuals, has legal experts divided.

While some believe SAT’s judgement is ‘flawed’, as it has only looked at the section meant for intermediaries and even individuals are covered under different sections, others say the FUTP Regulations, 1995, prohibits front-running by individuals, while the FUTP Regulations, 2003, prohibits it only by intermediaries.

“Front-running as an offence is pursued to be for intermediaries. So, will somebody who is an indirect beneficiary, fall under the purview? Common sense and justice demand that they should,” said Sinha.

“Given this particular example, we will need to have a serious look at our regulation,” he added

“It makes no logical sense to restrict the securities anti-fraud rule (even if one) to apply only to intermediaries and that too, registered intermediaries. The point is to protect investors, not punish wrongdoers if they wear a particular hat,” said of Finsec Law Advisors.

According to legal experts, the regulator should appeal against the SAT’s ruling, so that it doesn’t set a precedent.

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

Sebi to take re-look at front-running norms

Move comes after Securities Appellate Tribunal said regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals

BS Reporter  |  Mumbai 



The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) plans to review the regulations that govern front-running, to strengthen these, after a recent ruling by the (SAT) set aside its order on individuals on this count.

The tribunal overruled Sebi’s order on the grounds that the regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals.

“On this particular aspect of front-running, we will have to look at our regulations to see if it needs more improvement and strengthening,” said Chairman U K Sinha.

Front-running is an unethical practice of executing trades based on confidential information, to make profits. It is prohibited under Sebi’s Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (FUTP) Regulations.

In 2009, Sebi had passed an interim order that barred three individuals from the securities market and imposed penalties on them for their alleged front-running. An investigation had found and had traded on information from their cousin, Dipak Patel, who was working at Passport India Investment (Mauritius), on forthcoming trades by his organisation, to make a profit of Rs 1.56 crore.

Earlier this month, the order against these individuals was set aside by SAT.

The appellate body’s ruling that the FUTP Act cannot be applied for front-running by individuals, has legal experts divided.

While some believe SAT’s judgement is ‘flawed’, as it has only looked at the section meant for intermediaries and even individuals are covered under different sections, others say the FUTP Regulations, 1995, prohibits front-running by individuals, while the FUTP Regulations, 2003, prohibits it only by intermediaries.

“Front-running as an offence is pursued to be for intermediaries. So, will somebody who is an indirect beneficiary, fall under the purview? Common sense and justice demand that they should,” said Sinha.

“Given this particular example, we will need to have a serious look at our regulation,” he added

“It makes no logical sense to restrict the securities anti-fraud rule (even if one) to apply only to intermediaries and that too, registered intermediaries. The point is to protect investors, not punish wrongdoers if they wear a particular hat,” said of Finsec Law Advisors.

According to legal experts, the regulator should appeal against the SAT’s ruling, so that it doesn’t set a precedent.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Sebi to take re-look at front-running norms

Move comes after Securities Appellate Tribunal said regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) plans to review the regulations that govern front-running, to strengthen these, after a recent ruling by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) set aside its order on individuals on this count.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) plans to review the regulations that govern front-running, to strengthen these, after a recent ruling by the (SAT) set aside its order on individuals on this count.

The tribunal overruled Sebi’s order on the grounds that the regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals.

“On this particular aspect of front-running, we will have to look at our regulations to see if it needs more improvement and strengthening,” said Chairman U K Sinha.

Front-running is an unethical practice of executing trades based on confidential information, to make profits. It is prohibited under Sebi’s Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (FUTP) Regulations.

In 2009, Sebi had passed an interim order that barred three individuals from the securities market and imposed penalties on them for their alleged front-running. An investigation had found and had traded on information from their cousin, Dipak Patel, who was working at Passport India Investment (Mauritius), on forthcoming trades by his organisation, to make a profit of Rs 1.56 crore.

Earlier this month, the order against these individuals was set aside by SAT.

The appellate body’s ruling that the FUTP Act cannot be applied for front-running by individuals, has legal experts divided.

While some believe SAT’s judgement is ‘flawed’, as it has only looked at the section meant for intermediaries and even individuals are covered under different sections, others say the FUTP Regulations, 1995, prohibits front-running by individuals, while the FUTP Regulations, 2003, prohibits it only by intermediaries.

“Front-running as an offence is pursued to be for intermediaries. So, will somebody who is an indirect beneficiary, fall under the purview? Common sense and justice demand that they should,” said Sinha.

“Given this particular example, we will need to have a serious look at our regulation,” he added

“It makes no logical sense to restrict the securities anti-fraud rule (even if one) to apply only to intermediaries and that too, registered intermediaries. The point is to protect investors, not punish wrongdoers if they wear a particular hat,” said of Finsec Law Advisors.

According to legal experts, the regulator should appeal against the SAT’s ruling, so that it doesn’t set a precedent.

image
Business Standard
177 22

LIVE MARKET

BSE

  ( %)

NSE

  ( %)

More News

STOCK WATCH

Company Price() Chg(%)
Biocon 808.70 15.28
Motil.Oswal.Fin. 483.85 15.24
JM Financial 63.85 12.61
Bharat Financial 844.90 10.58
Force Motors 3220.15 7.47
> More on BSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
Biocon 809.70 15.57
Motil.Oswal.Fin. 484.90 15.37
JM Financial 63.75 12.43
Bharat Financial 843.60 10.46
Cairn India 191.90 8.51
> More on NSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
G N F C 158.35 -7.53
Raymond 457.65 -6.60
Canara Bank 240.90 -4.21
Atul 2092.45 -3.70
Hatsun AgroProd. 332.95 -3.38
> More on BSE Gainers
Company Price() Chg(%)
Raymond 458.45 -6.28
Canara Bank 241.30 -3.79
Atul 2093.10 -3.57
Union Bank (I) 126.45 -3.44
Minda Corp 118.65 -3.02
> More on NSE Gainers
Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine

Derivatives

Index
Instrument Type
Expiry Date
Option Type
Strike Price

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard