Business Standard

Sebi to take re-look at front-running norms

Move comes after Securities Appellate Tribunal said regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals

Related News

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) plans to review the regulations that govern front-running, to strengthen these, after a recent ruling by the (SAT) set aside its order on individuals on this count.

The tribunal overruled Sebi’s order on the grounds that the regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals.

“On this particular aspect of front-running, we will have to look at our regulations to see if it needs more improvement and strengthening,” said Chairman U K Sinha.

Front-running is an unethical practice of executing trades based on confidential information, to make profits. It is prohibited under Sebi’s Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (FUTP) Regulations.

In 2009, Sebi had passed an interim order that barred three individuals from the securities market and imposed penalties on them for their alleged front-running. An investigation had found and had traded on information from their cousin, Dipak Patel, who was working at Passport India Investment (Mauritius), on forthcoming trades by his organisation, to make a profit of Rs 1.56 crore.

Earlier this month, the order against these individuals was set aside by SAT.

The appellate body’s ruling that the FUTP Act cannot be applied for front-running by individuals, has legal experts divided.

While some believe SAT’s judgement is ‘flawed’, as it has only looked at the section meant for intermediaries and even individuals are covered under different sections, others say the FUTP Regulations, 1995, prohibits front-running by individuals, while the FUTP Regulations, 2003, prohibits it only by intermediaries.

“Front-running as an offence is pursued to be for intermediaries. So, will somebody who is an indirect beneficiary, fall under the purview? Common sense and justice demand that they should,” said Sinha.

“Given this particular example, we will need to have a serious look at our regulation,” he added

“It makes no logical sense to restrict the securities anti-fraud rule (even if one) to apply only to intermediaries and that too, registered intermediaries. The point is to protect investors, not punish wrongdoers if they wear a particular hat,” said of Finsec Law Advisors.

According to legal experts, the regulator should appeal against the SAT’s ruling, so that it doesn’t set a precedent.

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Sebi to take re-look at front-running norms

Move comes after Securities Appellate Tribunal said regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) plans to review the regulations that govern front-running, to strengthen these, after a recent ruling by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) set aside its order on individuals on this count.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) plans to review the regulations that govern front-running, to strengthen these, after a recent ruling by the (SAT) set aside its order on individuals on this count.

The tribunal overruled Sebi’s order on the grounds that the regulations only apply to market intermediaries and not individuals.

“On this particular aspect of front-running, we will have to look at our regulations to see if it needs more improvement and strengthening,” said Chairman U K Sinha.

Front-running is an unethical practice of executing trades based on confidential information, to make profits. It is prohibited under Sebi’s Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (FUTP) Regulations.

In 2009, Sebi had passed an interim order that barred three individuals from the securities market and imposed penalties on them for their alleged front-running. An investigation had found and had traded on information from their cousin, Dipak Patel, who was working at Passport India Investment (Mauritius), on forthcoming trades by his organisation, to make a profit of Rs 1.56 crore.

Earlier this month, the order against these individuals was set aside by SAT.

The appellate body’s ruling that the FUTP Act cannot be applied for front-running by individuals, has legal experts divided.

While some believe SAT’s judgement is ‘flawed’, as it has only looked at the section meant for intermediaries and even individuals are covered under different sections, others say the FUTP Regulations, 1995, prohibits front-running by individuals, while the FUTP Regulations, 2003, prohibits it only by intermediaries.

“Front-running as an offence is pursued to be for intermediaries. So, will somebody who is an indirect beneficiary, fall under the purview? Common sense and justice demand that they should,” said Sinha.

“Given this particular example, we will need to have a serious look at our regulation,” he added

“It makes no logical sense to restrict the securities anti-fraud rule (even if one) to apply only to intermediaries and that too, registered intermediaries. The point is to protect investors, not punish wrongdoers if they wear a particular hat,” said of Finsec Law Advisors.

According to legal experts, the regulator should appeal against the SAT’s ruling, so that it doesn’t set a precedent.

image

Read More

BSE launches carbon index

Premier bourse BSE, in collaboration with the UK government, today launched BSE Carbonex, the first-of-its-kind index in India or any emerging market ...

Recommended for you

Quick Links

Market News

RCom, BPCL plan to launch dollar bonds

For RCom, it will be second time the Ambani company is testing the investors' appetite for its paper

BSE currency options segment largest in the world

Number of contracts in currency options segment had grown by nearly 30% in March

Nifty ends down 101 points; TCS down 4%, Lupin slumps 7%

The 30-share Sensex ended down 224 points at 28,442 and the 50-share Nifty ended down 101 points at 8,606.

Sensex ends down 242 points; IT shares drag

The 30-share Sensex provisionally ended down 242 points at 28,425 and the 50-share Nifty ended down 104 points at 8,603.

Pharma shares extend fall; CNX Pharma index down 3%

Lupin, Aurobindo, Sun Pharma, Cadila Healthcare, Venus Remedies, SPARC & Shasun Pharma down were 3%-7%.

 

Back to Top