Business Standard

Suit filed to recover investors' money

Petition before Delhi HC says Sebi, BSE sleeping on job of protecting small investors' interest, that suspension/delisting of firms favours promoters

Related News

A public interest litigation (PIL), up for hearing next week in the high court here, has alleged that nearly Rs 1.8 lakh crore of investments by small investors is locked in suspended companies and the market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), has not initiated any steps to protect these investments.

Filed by Atul Agarwal, a Delhi-based commercial pilot, it urges the court “to take action in the matter to protect the interest of over 10 million public shareholders/investors of these 1,405 suspended companies, whose enormous investment of more than Rs 1,79,560 crore in these suspended companies is at stake”.

Sebi, the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the (MCA) are respondents, in addition to the Union government. The respondents have asked for time until May 30, when the hearing resumes, to respond. The petition also seeks revocation of BSE’s recently announced relisting guidelines.



Suspended companies constitute 16.6 per cent of the total list of the BSE, the petition says. Ajay Veer Singh, partner, BS Jain &Co, who is advising Agarwal, said, “This is a conservative estimate, based on data available for 949 companies. The entire amount could be much higher.”

According to publicly available data, these 949 companies have a public shareholding of 8,978 crore shares. The petitioner assumes that each of these shares were bought by investors for at least Rs 20, (the IPO price may be anything between Rs 10 per share and Rs 500 per share or more) arriving at the sum of Rs 1.8 lakh crore.

The petition alleges the exchange has not done anything to protect the interests of the investors.

It has accused and the promoters of these companies of colluding to get listed, “then collecting money from innocent investors by making tall promises and, thereafter, getting suspended for non-compliance of the listing agreement and finally getting delisted and disappearing with public funds”.

The petition notes the MCA and maintain a portfolio, called the Investor Education and Protection Fund. The petitioner filed a petition under the and found as much as Rs 1,055 crore was unused in this fund. It accuses BSE of “rampant and continuous misuse of powers” and of a “nonchalant attitude” from Sebi.

When a question about such practices was raised in a recent conference, Sebi chairman had said, promoters and companies doing such “asset stripping” would be dealt with in an appropriate manner. BSE officials declined comment, when asked.

Singh said the entire compulsory delisting process was skewed in favour of errant promoters. “If a promoter wants to shut the company and not pay the shareholder, all he has to do is stop paying the listing fees. The exchange will suspend the company. This is exactly what they want,” he charged. The flawed system, instead of penalising the company or promoter, lets them off easily while the investor is left carrying the can, he adds.

“Instead of compelling these errant listed companies to make adequate disclosure, the exchange is providing an easy way out for these errant listed companies by suspending the trading of stock/shares... after the promoters of errant companies siphon off all public money with them and vanish altogether, no steps or actions are ever initiated to trace these companies,” the petition says.

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Suit filed to recover investors' money

Petition before Delhi HC says Sebi, BSE sleeping on job of protecting small investors' interest, that suspension/delisting of firms favours promoters

A public interest litigation (PIL), up for hearing next week in the high court here, has alleged that nearly Rs 1.8 lakh crore of investments by small investors is locked in suspended companies and the market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), has not initiated any steps to protect these investments.

A public interest litigation (PIL), up for hearing next week in the high court here, has alleged that nearly Rs 1.8 lakh crore of investments by small investors is locked in suspended companies and the market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), has not initiated any steps to protect these investments.

Filed by Atul Agarwal, a Delhi-based commercial pilot, it urges the court “to take action in the matter to protect the interest of over 10 million public shareholders/investors of these 1,405 suspended companies, whose enormous investment of more than Rs 1,79,560 crore in these suspended companies is at stake”.

Sebi, the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the (MCA) are respondents, in addition to the Union government. The respondents have asked for time until May 30, when the hearing resumes, to respond. The petition also seeks revocation of BSE’s recently announced relisting guidelines.



Suspended companies constitute 16.6 per cent of the total list of the BSE, the petition says. Ajay Veer Singh, partner, BS Jain &Co, who is advising Agarwal, said, “This is a conservative estimate, based on data available for 949 companies. The entire amount could be much higher.”

According to publicly available data, these 949 companies have a public shareholding of 8,978 crore shares. The petitioner assumes that each of these shares were bought by investors for at least Rs 20, (the IPO price may be anything between Rs 10 per share and Rs 500 per share or more) arriving at the sum of Rs 1.8 lakh crore.

The petition alleges the exchange has not done anything to protect the interests of the investors.

It has accused and the promoters of these companies of colluding to get listed, “then collecting money from innocent investors by making tall promises and, thereafter, getting suspended for non-compliance of the listing agreement and finally getting delisted and disappearing with public funds”.

The petition notes the MCA and maintain a portfolio, called the Investor Education and Protection Fund. The petitioner filed a petition under the and found as much as Rs 1,055 crore was unused in this fund. It accuses BSE of “rampant and continuous misuse of powers” and of a “nonchalant attitude” from Sebi.

When a question about such practices was raised in a recent conference, Sebi chairman had said, promoters and companies doing such “asset stripping” would be dealt with in an appropriate manner. BSE officials declined comment, when asked.

Singh said the entire compulsory delisting process was skewed in favour of errant promoters. “If a promoter wants to shut the company and not pay the shareholder, all he has to do is stop paying the listing fees. The exchange will suspend the company. This is exactly what they want,” he charged. The flawed system, instead of penalising the company or promoter, lets them off easily while the investor is left carrying the can, he adds.

“Instead of compelling these errant listed companies to make adequate disclosure, the exchange is providing an easy way out for these errant listed companies by suspending the trading of stock/shares... after the promoters of errant companies siphon off all public money with them and vanish altogether, no steps or actions are ever initiated to trace these companies,” the petition says.

image

Read More

Agri Min proposes Rs 170/quintal hike in paddy MSP

In view of rising farm input costs, the Agriculture Ministry has proposed a Rs 170 per quintal increase in the minimum support price (MSP) of paddy ...

Recommended for you

Advertisements

Quick Links

Market News

I don't see any major upside till Diwali: Aseem Dhru

Q&A with the CEO & Managing Director of HDFC Securities

Pre- Market: 15 stocks to watch out for in today's trade

Cipla, BOB, NIIT Tech, Dabur, Rel comm, Hindustan Zinc and Cairn India are likely to remain in limelight

Slow pace of reforms in India is disappointing: Marc Faber

Q&A with renowned global investor and author of The Gloom, Boom & Doom report

Aberdeen gets MAT relief

Bombay High Court grants interim stay against tax authorities' order

Transfer of shares in insurers that leads to shareholding change not allowed: IRDAI

The regulator said that they would conduct their own due diligence for approval of such a transfer

 

Back to Top