Business Standard

Suit filed to recover investors' money

Petition before Delhi HC says Sebi, BSE sleeping on job of protecting small investors' interest, that suspension/delisting of firms favours promoters

Related News

A public interest litigation (), up for hearing next week in the high court here, has alleged that nearly Rs 1.8 lakh crore of investments by small investors is locked in suspended companies and the market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (), has not initiated any steps to protect these investments.

Filed by Atul Agarwal, a Delhi-based commercial pilot, it urges the court “to take action in the matter to protect the interest of over 10 million public shareholders/investors of these 1,405 suspended companies, whose enormous investment of more than Rs 1,79,560 crore in these suspended companies is at stake”.

Sebi, the Bombay Stock Exchange () and the (MCA) are respondents, in addition to the Union government. The respondents have asked for time until May 30, when the hearing resumes, to respond. The petition also seeks revocation of BSE’s recently announced relisting guidelines.



Suspended companies constitute 16.6 per cent of the total list of the BSE, the petition says. Ajay Veer Singh, partner, BS Jain &Co, who is advising Agarwal, said, “This is a conservative estimate, based on data available for 949 companies. The entire amount could be much higher.”

According to publicly available data, these 949 companies have a public shareholding of 8,978 crore shares. The petitioner assumes that each of these shares were bought by investors for at least Rs 20, (the IPO price may be anything between Rs 10 per share and Rs 500 per share or more) arriving at the sum of Rs 1.8 lakh crore.

The petition alleges the exchange has not done anything to protect the interests of the investors.

It has accused BSE and the promoters of these companies of colluding to get listed, “then collecting money from innocent investors by making tall promises and, thereafter, getting suspended for non-compliance of the listing agreement and finally getting delisted and disappearing with public funds”.

The petition notes the MCA and Sebi maintain a portfolio, called the Investor Education and Protection Fund. The petitioner filed a petition under the and found as much as Rs 1,055 crore was unused in this fund. It accuses BSE of “rampant and continuous misuse of powers” and of a “nonchalant attitude” from Sebi.

When a question about such practices was raised in a recent conference, Sebi chairman had said, promoters and companies doing such “asset stripping” would be dealt with in an appropriate manner. BSE officials declined comment, when asked.

Singh said the entire compulsory delisting process was skewed in favour of errant promoters. “If a promoter wants to shut the company and not pay the shareholder, all he has to do is stop paying the listing fees. The exchange will suspend the company. This is exactly what they want,” he charged. The flawed system, instead of penalising the company or promoter, lets them off easily while the investor is left carrying the can, he adds.

“Instead of compelling these errant listed companies to make adequate disclosure, the exchange is providing an easy way out for these errant listed companies by suspending the trading of stock/shares... after the promoters of errant companies siphon off all public money with them and vanish altogether, no steps or actions are ever initiated to trace these companies,” the petition says.

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Read More

Agri Min proposes Rs 170/quintal hike in paddy MSP

In view of rising farm input costs, the Agriculture Ministry has proposed a Rs 170 per quintal increase in the minimum support price (MSP) of paddy ...

Quick Links

 

Market News

5 companies get Sebi go-ahead for IPOs this year

According to analysts, the IPO market may see a revival this year

Unofficial gold imports rose 75% in 2013: Survey

The government's curbs were after a rise in gold import to $56 bn in 2012-13

Jaggery prices shoot up, in line with those of sugar

Farmers have shifted a large amount of high-quality cane (about 10%) to jaggery units so that these fetch 5-10% premium over the standard price ...

Cotton exports hit as China shifts policy

Raw cotton export may fall 20% in the next crop year as against 6% this year; rise in finished yarn exports adds to woes

Sugar exports: Industry restive over delays in subsidy revision

For February-March, the rate decided was Rs 3,300 a tonne; that for April-May was to be announced in the last week of March

Back to Top