ALSO READCoal scam: Delhi court raps CBI Delhi court summons Tytler for hiding criminal cases to renew passport Jagdish Tytler likely to appear in Delhi court for 1984 killing case 1984 anti-Sikh riots: Delhi court to pronounce order on Tytler's lie-detector test Do you want to undergo lie-detector test: Court asks Tytler
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had also filed appeals against the acquittal of Kumar and light sentence to ex-councillor Balwan Khokar.
The High Court had taken suo motu cognizance as during course of the arguments Kumar's lawyers mentioned these matters as precedents since co-accused Mahender Yadav, Balwan Khokar and Kishan Khokar had been acquitted in them.
The court noted that eyewitnesses had not been examined in those cases and there was a "travesty" since investigation was not done properly.
The court took suo motu cognizance of the "errors" in the 1986 trial judgment, adding that key eyewitnesses were not examined and cases were closed "very rapidly" seemingly without proper investigation and trial.
The bench passed this order after taking note of the trial court judgments passed in 1986 in the five cases.
The apex court had also directed the Centre to deposit more than 190 files in connection with this case.
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi told the apex court that the SIT in as many as 263 cases had no case files and there was no trace of any victim or witness.
On February 20, the Centre filed a status report in the top court on the investigation conducted by the SIT into anti-Sikh riots cases.
Anti-Sikh riots that broke out after the assassination of then prime minister Indira Gandhi had claimed 2,433 lives in Delhi alone.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)