ALSO READJustice Karnan approaches President for suspension of SC order Justice Khehar to be sworn in as CJI today SC rejects stay on Khehar's appointment as 44th CJI SC dismisses plea against promulgation of Enemy Property Act ordinance SC dismisses plea challenging Justice Khehar's Appointment as next CJI
Nethumpara pleaded to exercise the jurisdiction invested in his Excellency under Article 72 of the Constitution and suspend or stay the operation of the order dated May 9, passed by the Supreme Court convicting and sentencing the petitioner Justice Karnan.
It was a landmark ruling, as it is for the first time ever that a sitting High Court judge has been sentenced.
The May 9, order of the Apex Court subsequently had been challenged by Nethumpara, who claimed to be the lawyer of Justice Karnan.
He mentioned the matter before the five Judge Constitution bench, which said we would hear your prayer but not at this time.
Justice Karnan earlier sentenced the Chief Justice of India and six other apex court judges to five-year rigorous imprisonment after holding them guilty under the SC/ST Atrocities Act-1989 and amended Act of 2015.
Along with the Chief Justice of India, six judges - Justice Dipak Misra, Justice J. Chelameswar, Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Madan B. Lokur, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Justice Kurian Joseph - had initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Justice Karnan in February after he had named 20 "corrupt judges," seeking a probe against them.
Justice Karnan had alleged this was done because he is a Dalit.
Justice Karnan earlier on May 2 directed the court's registrar to issue non-bailable warrant against these seven Supreme Court judges.
He tagged the apex court judges as 'accused' for not being present.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)