You are here: Home » News-ANI » National
Business Standard

Not against Ram Temple but SC should give final verdict: Muslim clerics

ANI  |  New Delhi/ Lucknow [India] 

After the Supreme described the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya as a "sensitive" and "sentimental" issue and suggested that it would be best if the contentious issue is settled amicably, the Muslim clerics on Tuesday said they are not against construction of the Ram Temple but added the apex should give a final verdict on the matter.

Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahali told ANI in that a final statement on the issue will be made only after discussions with the senior clerics.

"Whatever suggestion the Supreme gave we respect that. We were never against the construction of the ram temple. But the Ayodhya issue is a very sensitive issue. We will discuss it with senior clerics, our community then only a make final statement. In the past, we had sat for negotiations but due to undue interference by political parties no solution could be found, hence the Supreme should give a final verdict," he added.

Echoing similar sentiments, another Muslim cleric Umer Ilyasi said it will be in the best interest of everyone if the matter is resolved keeping the viewpoint of both Hindus and Muslims in mind.

"This issue has been pending in the Supreme for a very long time. Now it is better to solve the problem together so that both the sides are happy and in the interest of both the sides," he added.

The apex today said that fresh attempts must be made by all parties to end the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute through negotiated settlement. The said it would step in only if the matter can't be resolved through talks.

The top court's suggestion comes after BJP leader and Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy sought an urgent hearing on the Ayodhya dispute.

The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S Khehar said judicial orders can bind parties but such sensitive matters are best settled through negotiations.

The matter has been pending since 2010, when the Supreme had put a freeze on a judgment by the Allahabad High

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Not against Ram Temple but SC should give final verdict: Muslim clerics

After the Supreme Court described the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya as a "sensitive" and "sentimental" issue and suggested that it would be best if the contentious issue is settled amicably, the Muslim clerics on Tuesday said they are not against construction of the Ram Temple but added the apex court should give a final verdict on the matter.Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahali told ANI in Lucknow that a final statement on the issue will be made only after discussions with the senior clerics."Whatever suggestion the Supreme Court gave we respect that. We were never against the construction of the ram temple. But the Ayodhya issue is a very sensitive issue. We will discuss it with senior clerics, our community then only a make final statement. In the past, we had sat for negotiations but due to undue interference by political parties no solution could be found, hence the Supreme Court should give a final verdict," he added.Echoing similar sentiments, another Muslim cleric Umer Ilyasi said it ...

After the Supreme described the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya as a "sensitive" and "sentimental" issue and suggested that it would be best if the contentious issue is settled amicably, the Muslim clerics on Tuesday said they are not against construction of the Ram Temple but added the apex should give a final verdict on the matter.

Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahali told ANI in that a final statement on the issue will be made only after discussions with the senior clerics.

"Whatever suggestion the Supreme gave we respect that. We were never against the construction of the ram temple. But the Ayodhya issue is a very sensitive issue. We will discuss it with senior clerics, our community then only a make final statement. In the past, we had sat for negotiations but due to undue interference by political parties no solution could be found, hence the Supreme should give a final verdict," he added.

Echoing similar sentiments, another Muslim cleric Umer Ilyasi said it will be in the best interest of everyone if the matter is resolved keeping the viewpoint of both Hindus and Muslims in mind.

"This issue has been pending in the Supreme for a very long time. Now it is better to solve the problem together so that both the sides are happy and in the interest of both the sides," he added.

The apex today said that fresh attempts must be made by all parties to end the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute through negotiated settlement. The said it would step in only if the matter can't be resolved through talks.

The top court's suggestion comes after BJP leader and Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy sought an urgent hearing on the Ayodhya dispute.

The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S Khehar said judicial orders can bind parties but such sensitive matters are best settled through negotiations.

The matter has been pending since 2010, when the Supreme had put a freeze on a judgment by the Allahabad High

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Not against Ram Temple but SC should give final verdict: Muslim clerics

After the Supreme described the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya as a "sensitive" and "sentimental" issue and suggested that it would be best if the contentious issue is settled amicably, the Muslim clerics on Tuesday said they are not against construction of the Ram Temple but added the apex should give a final verdict on the matter.

Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahali told ANI in that a final statement on the issue will be made only after discussions with the senior clerics.

"Whatever suggestion the Supreme gave we respect that. We were never against the construction of the ram temple. But the Ayodhya issue is a very sensitive issue. We will discuss it with senior clerics, our community then only a make final statement. In the past, we had sat for negotiations but due to undue interference by political parties no solution could be found, hence the Supreme should give a final verdict," he added.

Echoing similar sentiments, another Muslim cleric Umer Ilyasi said it will be in the best interest of everyone if the matter is resolved keeping the viewpoint of both Hindus and Muslims in mind.

"This issue has been pending in the Supreme for a very long time. Now it is better to solve the problem together so that both the sides are happy and in the interest of both the sides," he added.

The apex today said that fresh attempts must be made by all parties to end the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute through negotiated settlement. The said it would step in only if the matter can't be resolved through talks.

The top court's suggestion comes after BJP leader and Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy sought an urgent hearing on the Ayodhya dispute.

The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S Khehar said judicial orders can bind parties but such sensitive matters are best settled through negotiations.

The matter has been pending since 2010, when the Supreme had put a freeze on a judgment by the Allahabad High

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22