You are here: Home » News-ANI » International » World
Business Standard

Pak lawmakers see CPEC as another 'East India Company' in making

ANI  |  Islamabad [Pakistan] 

Lawmakers from the upper house have expressed fear that if Pakistan's interests are not actively protected, the China-Economic Corridor (CPEC) could turn into another East Company, which became the precursor to the British colonial presence in the subcontinent, eventually gaining power and overthrowing the ruling Mughals.

"Another East Company is in the offing; national interests are not being protected. We are proud of the friendship between and China, but the interests of the state should come first," the Dawn quoted Senator Tahir Mashhadi, chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development as saying, as he addressed concerns raised by some committee members that the government was not protecting the rights and interests of the people.

Following a briefing by Secretary Yousuf Nadeem Khokhar, a number of committee members voiced their fears over what they perceived as the utilisation of local financing for the projects, instead of funding from the Chinese or any other foreign investment.

They also expressed concern over the fixing of power tariff for CPEC-related power projects by the Chinese.

Since only one of three Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) members of the committee were present at the meeting, most of this criticism went unanswered.

PML- N's Senator Saeedul Hassan Mandokhail alos endorsed the committee chairman's complaints.

The meeting was informed that a major portion of the depended on local finances rather than Chinese investment.

"It will be very harmful for us if we have to bear the entire burden; will this [project] be a national development or a national calamity? Whatever loans taken from will have to be paid by the poor people of Pakistan," Mashhadi observed.

Highlighting the status of CPEC-related power projects, the secretary said that the Matiari-Lahore transmission line project had "not been scrapped" and was being pursued by its Chinese sponsors.

Recently, the National Energy Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) had approved tariff for the project, while the government's Private Power Infrastructure Board had filed a review petition on the tariff in order to address the sponsors' concerns.

At this, Senator Usman Khan Kakar pointed out that NEPRA had fixed the power tariff for the project at 71 paisas/unit, while Chinese investors were demanding 95 paisas/unit.

"The government has filed an appeal before Nepra, seeking the increase despite the fact that the burden will be borne by poor consumers," he said.

He also said that the infrastructure being established in Gwadar would only benefit the Chinese and Punjab governments, not the local community.

"The people of Balochistan will only get one benefit from this project, which is the water supply," he said, adding that no electricity or railway projects had been planned for Balochistan under the CPEC.

Senator Mandokhail said that a sense of deprivation was being instilled in smaller provinces. "We do not want the at the cost of the federation," he added.

He also accused the of prioritising Balochistan very low on its list, given that it has not representation in the commission itself.

Jamaat-i-Islami Emir Senator Sirajul Haq said that like certain other parts of the country, Fata and AJK were also being neglected in the CPEC.

"There is nothing for both areas in the CPEC," he said and suggested that a 35km road was built to link Muzaffarabad to the so that the people of AJK could also reap its benefits.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Pak lawmakers see CPEC as another 'East India Company' in making

Lawmakers from the upper house have expressed fear that if Pakistan's interests are not actively protected, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) could turn into another East India Company, which became the precursor to the British colonial presence in the subcontinent, eventually gaining power and overthrowing the ruling Mughals."Another East India Company is in the offing; national interests are not being protected. We are proud of the friendship between Pakistan and China, but the interests of the state should come first," the Dawn quoted Senator Tahir Mashhadi, chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development as saying, as he addressed concerns raised by some committee members that the government was not protecting the rights and interests of the people.Following a briefing by Planning Commission Secretary Yousuf Nadeem Khokhar, a number of committee members voiced their fears over what they perceived as the utilisation of local financing for the CPEC ...

Lawmakers from the upper house have expressed fear that if Pakistan's interests are not actively protected, the China-Economic Corridor (CPEC) could turn into another East Company, which became the precursor to the British colonial presence in the subcontinent, eventually gaining power and overthrowing the ruling Mughals.

"Another East Company is in the offing; national interests are not being protected. We are proud of the friendship between and China, but the interests of the state should come first," the Dawn quoted Senator Tahir Mashhadi, chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development as saying, as he addressed concerns raised by some committee members that the government was not protecting the rights and interests of the people.

Following a briefing by Secretary Yousuf Nadeem Khokhar, a number of committee members voiced their fears over what they perceived as the utilisation of local financing for the projects, instead of funding from the Chinese or any other foreign investment.

They also expressed concern over the fixing of power tariff for CPEC-related power projects by the Chinese.

Since only one of three Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) members of the committee were present at the meeting, most of this criticism went unanswered.

PML- N's Senator Saeedul Hassan Mandokhail alos endorsed the committee chairman's complaints.

The meeting was informed that a major portion of the depended on local finances rather than Chinese investment.

"It will be very harmful for us if we have to bear the entire burden; will this [project] be a national development or a national calamity? Whatever loans taken from will have to be paid by the poor people of Pakistan," Mashhadi observed.

Highlighting the status of CPEC-related power projects, the secretary said that the Matiari-Lahore transmission line project had "not been scrapped" and was being pursued by its Chinese sponsors.

Recently, the National Energy Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) had approved tariff for the project, while the government's Private Power Infrastructure Board had filed a review petition on the tariff in order to address the sponsors' concerns.

At this, Senator Usman Khan Kakar pointed out that NEPRA had fixed the power tariff for the project at 71 paisas/unit, while Chinese investors were demanding 95 paisas/unit.

"The government has filed an appeal before Nepra, seeking the increase despite the fact that the burden will be borne by poor consumers," he said.

He also said that the infrastructure being established in Gwadar would only benefit the Chinese and Punjab governments, not the local community.

"The people of Balochistan will only get one benefit from this project, which is the water supply," he said, adding that no electricity or railway projects had been planned for Balochistan under the CPEC.

Senator Mandokhail said that a sense of deprivation was being instilled in smaller provinces. "We do not want the at the cost of the federation," he added.

He also accused the of prioritising Balochistan very low on its list, given that it has not representation in the commission itself.

Jamaat-i-Islami Emir Senator Sirajul Haq said that like certain other parts of the country, Fata and AJK were also being neglected in the CPEC.

"There is nothing for both areas in the CPEC," he said and suggested that a 35km road was built to link Muzaffarabad to the so that the people of AJK could also reap its benefits.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Pak lawmakers see CPEC as another 'East India Company' in making

Lawmakers from the upper house have expressed fear that if Pakistan's interests are not actively protected, the China-Economic Corridor (CPEC) could turn into another East Company, which became the precursor to the British colonial presence in the subcontinent, eventually gaining power and overthrowing the ruling Mughals.

"Another East Company is in the offing; national interests are not being protected. We are proud of the friendship between and China, but the interests of the state should come first," the Dawn quoted Senator Tahir Mashhadi, chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development as saying, as he addressed concerns raised by some committee members that the government was not protecting the rights and interests of the people.

Following a briefing by Secretary Yousuf Nadeem Khokhar, a number of committee members voiced their fears over what they perceived as the utilisation of local financing for the projects, instead of funding from the Chinese or any other foreign investment.

They also expressed concern over the fixing of power tariff for CPEC-related power projects by the Chinese.

Since only one of three Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) members of the committee were present at the meeting, most of this criticism went unanswered.

PML- N's Senator Saeedul Hassan Mandokhail alos endorsed the committee chairman's complaints.

The meeting was informed that a major portion of the depended on local finances rather than Chinese investment.

"It will be very harmful for us if we have to bear the entire burden; will this [project] be a national development or a national calamity? Whatever loans taken from will have to be paid by the poor people of Pakistan," Mashhadi observed.

Highlighting the status of CPEC-related power projects, the secretary said that the Matiari-Lahore transmission line project had "not been scrapped" and was being pursued by its Chinese sponsors.

Recently, the National Energy Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) had approved tariff for the project, while the government's Private Power Infrastructure Board had filed a review petition on the tariff in order to address the sponsors' concerns.

At this, Senator Usman Khan Kakar pointed out that NEPRA had fixed the power tariff for the project at 71 paisas/unit, while Chinese investors were demanding 95 paisas/unit.

"The government has filed an appeal before Nepra, seeking the increase despite the fact that the burden will be borne by poor consumers," he said.

He also said that the infrastructure being established in Gwadar would only benefit the Chinese and Punjab governments, not the local community.

"The people of Balochistan will only get one benefit from this project, which is the water supply," he said, adding that no electricity or railway projects had been planned for Balochistan under the CPEC.

Senator Mandokhail said that a sense of deprivation was being instilled in smaller provinces. "We do not want the at the cost of the federation," he added.

He also accused the of prioritising Balochistan very low on its list, given that it has not representation in the commission itself.

Jamaat-i-Islami Emir Senator Sirajul Haq said that like certain other parts of the country, Fata and AJK were also being neglected in the CPEC.

"There is nothing for both areas in the CPEC," he said and suggested that a 35km road was built to link Muzaffarabad to the so that the people of AJK could also reap its benefits.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard