You are here: Home » News-ANI » International » World
Business Standard

Terror outfits are Pak's 'prized instruments': Ashley J. Tellis

ANI  |  New Delhi[India] 

A senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington-based foreign policy think tank, has said that protects the terror outfits active on its soil as it views them as 'prized instruments', which assists the state in its proxy wars against neighbouring countries like and India.

Ashley J. Tellis said in an article recently that protects these terror outfits as they view them as 'prized instruments' in its irregular wars against neighbours and, hence, is even willing to risk the internal blowback that episodically ensues from such a strategy.

He said that Pakistani today aims to secure larger strategic objectives rather than remedy specific grievances like with its support to the and the Haqqanis, it wants to ensure geopolitical subordination of to Pakistan.

Similarly, the latest proxy war against is directed against the entire Indian land mass and is intended entirely to undermine the country's emergence as a great power.

If the Army's reluctance to initiate action against outfits such as the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Hizbul Mujahideen were rooted in operational overextension, these groups would not continue to enjoy the financial subsidies, targeting assistance and operational backing-under the generally directive, but also occasionally detailed, control-of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), he said.

Tellis points out that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'hopeful' journey towards normalcy with has now collapsed 'tragically' into blood and recrimination just like that of his predecessors, who have made several attempts for peaceful Indo-Pak relations.

Backing the recent surgical strike conducted by the against terror launch pads across the Line of Control (LoC), Tellis said that with "the recent Indian reprisals were deliberately modest in their aims and execution, intended primarily to signal to domestic, Pakistani and international audiences that New Delhi's traditional restraint could not be taken for granted forever."

He said that the Army must stop supporting terrorist groups as part of its confrontation with India.

It is sometimes argued in the West-as George Perkovich and Toby Dalton have recently done-that "cannot reasonably expect that Pakistani authorities will be willing and able to destroy groups such as (Lashkar-e-Taiba), and simultaneously eradicate the numerous militant groups that now threaten the internal security of more directly".

He said that Islamabad' current problems countered in fighting terrorists is a result of its own continued flirtation with arson and letting go of the terrorist groups it has spawned over the years is presently less a function of inability than it is a deliberate choice.

Pakistan's against India, accordingly, cannot be eliminated by negotiations with either Islamabad or Rawalpindi, he said, adding that sooner or later, a military riposte was inevitable, even from an otherwise soft state such as not because it promised a permanent solution to the problem of Pakistani but because doing nothing proved worse than doing something, however incomplete or unsatisfactory.

In these circumstances, only actualizing Pakistan's long-advertised "strategic shift" against can conclusively eliminate the risk of major regional war. Bilateral diplomacy seems ineffective because the most serious disputes simply lack solutions that would simultaneously satisfy the Army and the Indian state. Nor can immunize itself by improving homeland security alone: its physical proximity, economic constraints and institutional weaknesses combine to prevent hermetic security.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Terror outfits are Pak's 'prized instruments': Ashley J. Tellis

A senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington-based foreign policy think tank, has said that Pakistan protects the terror outfits active on its soil as it views them as 'prized instruments', which assists the state in its proxy wars against neighbouring countries like Afghanistan and India.Ashley J. Tellis said in an article recently that Pakistan protects these terror outfits as they view them as 'prized instruments' in its irregular wars against neighbours and, hence, is even willing to risk the internal blowback that episodically ensues from such a strategy.He said that Pakistani terrorism today aims to secure larger strategic objectives rather than remedy specific grievances like with its support to the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqanis, it wants to ensure geopolitical subordination of Afghanistan to Pakistan.Similarly, the latest proxy war against India is directed against the entire Indian land mass and is intended entirely to undermine the ...

A senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington-based foreign policy think tank, has said that protects the terror outfits active on its soil as it views them as 'prized instruments', which assists the state in its proxy wars against neighbouring countries like and India.

Ashley J. Tellis said in an article recently that protects these terror outfits as they view them as 'prized instruments' in its irregular wars against neighbours and, hence, is even willing to risk the internal blowback that episodically ensues from such a strategy.

He said that Pakistani today aims to secure larger strategic objectives rather than remedy specific grievances like with its support to the and the Haqqanis, it wants to ensure geopolitical subordination of to Pakistan.

Similarly, the latest proxy war against is directed against the entire Indian land mass and is intended entirely to undermine the country's emergence as a great power.

If the Army's reluctance to initiate action against outfits such as the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Hizbul Mujahideen were rooted in operational overextension, these groups would not continue to enjoy the financial subsidies, targeting assistance and operational backing-under the generally directive, but also occasionally detailed, control-of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), he said.

Tellis points out that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'hopeful' journey towards normalcy with has now collapsed 'tragically' into blood and recrimination just like that of his predecessors, who have made several attempts for peaceful Indo-Pak relations.

Backing the recent surgical strike conducted by the against terror launch pads across the Line of Control (LoC), Tellis said that with "the recent Indian reprisals were deliberately modest in their aims and execution, intended primarily to signal to domestic, Pakistani and international audiences that New Delhi's traditional restraint could not be taken for granted forever."

He said that the Army must stop supporting terrorist groups as part of its confrontation with India.

It is sometimes argued in the West-as George Perkovich and Toby Dalton have recently done-that "cannot reasonably expect that Pakistani authorities will be willing and able to destroy groups such as (Lashkar-e-Taiba), and simultaneously eradicate the numerous militant groups that now threaten the internal security of more directly".

He said that Islamabad' current problems countered in fighting terrorists is a result of its own continued flirtation with arson and letting go of the terrorist groups it has spawned over the years is presently less a function of inability than it is a deliberate choice.

Pakistan's against India, accordingly, cannot be eliminated by negotiations with either Islamabad or Rawalpindi, he said, adding that sooner or later, a military riposte was inevitable, even from an otherwise soft state such as not because it promised a permanent solution to the problem of Pakistani but because doing nothing proved worse than doing something, however incomplete or unsatisfactory.

In these circumstances, only actualizing Pakistan's long-advertised "strategic shift" against can conclusively eliminate the risk of major regional war. Bilateral diplomacy seems ineffective because the most serious disputes simply lack solutions that would simultaneously satisfy the Army and the Indian state. Nor can immunize itself by improving homeland security alone: its physical proximity, economic constraints and institutional weaknesses combine to prevent hermetic security.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Terror outfits are Pak's 'prized instruments': Ashley J. Tellis

A senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington-based foreign policy think tank, has said that protects the terror outfits active on its soil as it views them as 'prized instruments', which assists the state in its proxy wars against neighbouring countries like and India.

Ashley J. Tellis said in an article recently that protects these terror outfits as they view them as 'prized instruments' in its irregular wars against neighbours and, hence, is even willing to risk the internal blowback that episodically ensues from such a strategy.

He said that Pakistani today aims to secure larger strategic objectives rather than remedy specific grievances like with its support to the and the Haqqanis, it wants to ensure geopolitical subordination of to Pakistan.

Similarly, the latest proxy war against is directed against the entire Indian land mass and is intended entirely to undermine the country's emergence as a great power.

If the Army's reluctance to initiate action against outfits such as the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Hizbul Mujahideen were rooted in operational overextension, these groups would not continue to enjoy the financial subsidies, targeting assistance and operational backing-under the generally directive, but also occasionally detailed, control-of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), he said.

Tellis points out that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'hopeful' journey towards normalcy with has now collapsed 'tragically' into blood and recrimination just like that of his predecessors, who have made several attempts for peaceful Indo-Pak relations.

Backing the recent surgical strike conducted by the against terror launch pads across the Line of Control (LoC), Tellis said that with "the recent Indian reprisals were deliberately modest in their aims and execution, intended primarily to signal to domestic, Pakistani and international audiences that New Delhi's traditional restraint could not be taken for granted forever."

He said that the Army must stop supporting terrorist groups as part of its confrontation with India.

It is sometimes argued in the West-as George Perkovich and Toby Dalton have recently done-that "cannot reasonably expect that Pakistani authorities will be willing and able to destroy groups such as (Lashkar-e-Taiba), and simultaneously eradicate the numerous militant groups that now threaten the internal security of more directly".

He said that Islamabad' current problems countered in fighting terrorists is a result of its own continued flirtation with arson and letting go of the terrorist groups it has spawned over the years is presently less a function of inability than it is a deliberate choice.

Pakistan's against India, accordingly, cannot be eliminated by negotiations with either Islamabad or Rawalpindi, he said, adding that sooner or later, a military riposte was inevitable, even from an otherwise soft state such as not because it promised a permanent solution to the problem of Pakistani but because doing nothing proved worse than doing something, however incomplete or unsatisfactory.

In these circumstances, only actualizing Pakistan's long-advertised "strategic shift" against can conclusively eliminate the risk of major regional war. Bilateral diplomacy seems ineffective because the most serious disputes simply lack solutions that would simultaneously satisfy the Army and the Indian state. Nor can immunize itself by improving homeland security alone: its physical proximity, economic constraints and institutional weaknesses combine to prevent hermetic security.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard