As the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Cricket Australia (CA) and Australia's Cricketers Association (ACA) ends in less than a fortnight, David Warner has underlined the willingness of the nation's top players to go without employment in order to achieve the retention of the fixed revenue percentage model which is at the heart of the pay dispute.
Both the organisations are making very little progress in talks over how to reach a compromise on the next deal.
And if a deal is not signed before July 1, Australia's cricketers will be effectively unemployed, something Warner says remains a genuine possibility.
"Well from July 1 - we're unemployed", Warner was quoted as saying by news.com.au.
"We've been threatened with that. We're hopeful there's going to be an agreement done - it's a sticky situation."
Warner has been the most outspoken critic of the board in recent weeks after the CA chief executive James Sutherland threatened they would be left unemployed if the ACA did not agree to CA's terms.
The smashing left-handed opener said that the players were committed to ensuring all cricketers shared in the game's upside, not just an elite few.
"We're prepared as players to give a little bit more in that revenue share [percentage]," he said of the ACA's proposal to reduce the players share from around 26% to 22.5% with more money to go to grassroots levels.
"But that's what we want. We're not going to budge from the revenue sharing model, we want equality, and a fair share for domestic and female players. That in a nutshell is what it's all about," he added.
Australia are set to tour Bangladesh in the coming months for a two-Test series and the squad was named this week. But if a new MOU is not signed shortly, the tour is unlikely to take place
Warner says training and preparation for the tour will certainly be compromised without a deal struck.
"From our point of view I want to play for Australia and so do the other boys. But if there's nothing that's put in place for what we're trying to achieve here, from both point of views, we're not going to tour Bangladesh, there might not be an Ashes if we don't have an MoU," he said
"We want to keep playing cricket for Australia, that's our goal. If there's no cricket in summer, what are we going to do? We're going to be locked out. Where do we train? They can lock us out from all the different training facilities. It's going to be disappointing if it comes to that, we want to keep playing for Australia. But if we don't have the MoU done, it's going to be hard for us to walk on that plane come Bangladesh," he added.
ACA had earlier rejected the new pay offer from the game's governing body, saying the proposal will be a win for cricket administrators but a loss for the game.
The ACA had also insisted that the CA's proposal disrespects the value of domestic cricketers and the role they play in Australian cricket
CA, on the other hand, has maintained that their new pay offer has to be implemented for the long-term good of the game.
In March, CA made an offer, proposing that the average pay of Australia's international women's players would rise from $A79,000 to $A179,000, while the average remuneration of state cricketers would more than double to $A52,000.
Under CA's proposal, only male international players would have the chance to share in any surplus revenue, while other domestic male players and women at both domestic and international level would have to settle for fixed amounts which would not fluctuate according to the game's income.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)