You are here: Home » News-IANS » Politics
Business Standard

21 AAP MLAs seek four more weeks to respond to EC notice

IANS  |  New Delhi 

The 21 (AAP) legislators, who were appointed Parliamentary Secretaries, on Monday sought four more weeks' time to file their replies before the Commission of (ECI) in the "office of profit" case.

The Commission last week gave these 21 legislators time till October 17 (Monday) to explain why they should not be disqualified from the assembly after their appointment as Parliamentary Secretaries as the post was deemed to be Office of Profit.

In the notice, the ECI had also told petitioner Prashant Patel to submit his rejoinder to the 21 AAP lawmakers' reply by October 21.

"We have demanded four weeks' time from the commission to file our replies as our advocates are out of station and all our files are with them," AAP lawmaker Madan Lal, who was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Vigilance, told IANS.

Petitioner Prashant Patel reiterated: "No reply was filed by 21 AAP MLAs in the office of profit case today (Monday) in the Commission."

The AAP legislators had earlier written to the Commission requesting for more time to file their replies, following which the extension till October 17 was given.

After coming to power in February 2015, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's government appointed 21 party lawmakers as Parliamentary Secretaries, saying this would facilitate smooth functioning of the government but would not cause any burden on the exchequer.

The Delhi High Court in September quashed these appointments of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries.

In June 2015, a major row was sparked off on the issue of "Office of Profit" after President Pranab Mukherjee rejected the Delhi government's bill to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the "Office of Profit" definition.

The Delhi government sought through a bill to amend the Delhi Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, 1997, so as to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the definition of "Office of Profit".

The AAP has maintained that none of the Parliamentary Secretaries was given "pecuniary benefits" and the appointment of the party legislators as Parliamentary Secretaries did not amount to creation of a "public office".

--IANS

am-vv/ask/vt

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

21 AAP MLAs seek four more weeks to respond to EC notice

The 21 Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) legislators, who were appointed Parliamentary Secretaries, on Monday sought four more weeks' time to file their replies before the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the "office of profit" case.

The 21 (AAP) legislators, who were appointed Parliamentary Secretaries, on Monday sought four more weeks' time to file their replies before the Commission of (ECI) in the "office of profit" case.

The Commission last week gave these 21 legislators time till October 17 (Monday) to explain why they should not be disqualified from the assembly after their appointment as Parliamentary Secretaries as the post was deemed to be Office of Profit.

In the notice, the ECI had also told petitioner Prashant Patel to submit his rejoinder to the 21 AAP lawmakers' reply by October 21.

"We have demanded four weeks' time from the commission to file our replies as our advocates are out of station and all our files are with them," AAP lawmaker Madan Lal, who was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Vigilance, told IANS.

Petitioner Prashant Patel reiterated: "No reply was filed by 21 AAP MLAs in the office of profit case today (Monday) in the Commission."

The AAP legislators had earlier written to the Commission requesting for more time to file their replies, following which the extension till October 17 was given.

After coming to power in February 2015, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's government appointed 21 party lawmakers as Parliamentary Secretaries, saying this would facilitate smooth functioning of the government but would not cause any burden on the exchequer.

The Delhi High Court in September quashed these appointments of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries.

In June 2015, a major row was sparked off on the issue of "Office of Profit" after President Pranab Mukherjee rejected the Delhi government's bill to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the "Office of Profit" definition.

The Delhi government sought through a bill to amend the Delhi Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, 1997, so as to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the definition of "Office of Profit".

The AAP has maintained that none of the Parliamentary Secretaries was given "pecuniary benefits" and the appointment of the party legislators as Parliamentary Secretaries did not amount to creation of a "public office".

--IANS

am-vv/ask/vt

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

21 AAP MLAs seek four more weeks to respond to EC notice

The 21 (AAP) legislators, who were appointed Parliamentary Secretaries, on Monday sought four more weeks' time to file their replies before the Commission of (ECI) in the "office of profit" case.

The Commission last week gave these 21 legislators time till October 17 (Monday) to explain why they should not be disqualified from the assembly after their appointment as Parliamentary Secretaries as the post was deemed to be Office of Profit.

In the notice, the ECI had also told petitioner Prashant Patel to submit his rejoinder to the 21 AAP lawmakers' reply by October 21.

"We have demanded four weeks' time from the commission to file our replies as our advocates are out of station and all our files are with them," AAP lawmaker Madan Lal, who was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Vigilance, told IANS.

Petitioner Prashant Patel reiterated: "No reply was filed by 21 AAP MLAs in the office of profit case today (Monday) in the Commission."

The AAP legislators had earlier written to the Commission requesting for more time to file their replies, following which the extension till October 17 was given.

After coming to power in February 2015, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's government appointed 21 party lawmakers as Parliamentary Secretaries, saying this would facilitate smooth functioning of the government but would not cause any burden on the exchequer.

The Delhi High Court in September quashed these appointments of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries.

In June 2015, a major row was sparked off on the issue of "Office of Profit" after President Pranab Mukherjee rejected the Delhi government's bill to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the "Office of Profit" definition.

The Delhi government sought through a bill to amend the Delhi Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, 1997, so as to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the definition of "Office of Profit".

The AAP has maintained that none of the Parliamentary Secretaries was given "pecuniary benefits" and the appointment of the party legislators as Parliamentary Secretaries did not amount to creation of a "public office".

--IANS

am-vv/ask/vt

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard