Business Standard

AAP MLAs get time till October 17 to respond

IANS  |  New Delhi 

The Commission of (ECI) has given 21 (AAP) legislators in till October 17 to explain why they should not be disqualified from the assembly after their appointment as Parliamentary Secretaries.

In the notice issued on Monday, the ECI also told petitioner Prashant Patel to submit his rejoinder to the 21 AAP lawmakers' reply by October 21.

The AAP legislators had earlier written to the Commission requesting for more time to file their replies, following which the extension till October 17 has been given.

"It may be noted that if no reply is received by the aforesaid date, it will be presumed that you have nothing to say in this matter and the Commission will take appropriate action without any further reference to you," the EC notice said.

After coming to power in February 2015, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's government appointed 21 party lawmakers as the Parliamentary Secretaries, saying this would facilitate smooth functioning of the government but would not cause any burden on the exchequer.

The High Court in September quashed the appointment of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries. The AAP, however, refused to comment over the issue and maintained that it was an ongoing process.

After the notice, (BJP) on Thursday reiterated its demand of "disqualification" of the 21 AAP legislators in "office of profit" matter.

"It is already proven that they (AAP MLAs) were holding office of profit so we are demanding that their membership must be cancelled," BJP chief Satish Upadhyay told IANS.

Congress legal affairs in-charge, Aman Panwar told IANS that the 21 AAP MLAs were illegally appointed as parliamentary secretaries in the government.

"Under the law, they must be disqualified," he demanded.

In June 2015, a major row was sparked off on the issue of 'Office of Profit' after President Pranab Mukherjee rejected the government's bill to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the 'Office of Profit' definition.

The government sought through the bill an amendment to the Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, 1997, so as to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the definition of 'Office of Profit'.

The AAP has maintained that none of the Parliamentary Secretaries was given "pecuniary benefits" and the appointment of the party legislators as Parliamentary Secretaries did not amount to creation of a "public office".

--IANS

am-aks/vgu/dg

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

AAP MLAs get time till October 17 to respond

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has given 21 Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) legislators in Delhi till October 17 to explain why they should not be disqualified from the assembly after their appointment as Parliamentary Secretaries.

The Commission of (ECI) has given 21 (AAP) legislators in till October 17 to explain why they should not be disqualified from the assembly after their appointment as Parliamentary Secretaries.

In the notice issued on Monday, the ECI also told petitioner Prashant Patel to submit his rejoinder to the 21 AAP lawmakers' reply by October 21.

The AAP legislators had earlier written to the Commission requesting for more time to file their replies, following which the extension till October 17 has been given.

"It may be noted that if no reply is received by the aforesaid date, it will be presumed that you have nothing to say in this matter and the Commission will take appropriate action without any further reference to you," the EC notice said.

After coming to power in February 2015, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's government appointed 21 party lawmakers as the Parliamentary Secretaries, saying this would facilitate smooth functioning of the government but would not cause any burden on the exchequer.

The High Court in September quashed the appointment of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries. The AAP, however, refused to comment over the issue and maintained that it was an ongoing process.

After the notice, (BJP) on Thursday reiterated its demand of "disqualification" of the 21 AAP legislators in "office of profit" matter.

"It is already proven that they (AAP MLAs) were holding office of profit so we are demanding that their membership must be cancelled," BJP chief Satish Upadhyay told IANS.

Congress legal affairs in-charge, Aman Panwar told IANS that the 21 AAP MLAs were illegally appointed as parliamentary secretaries in the government.

"Under the law, they must be disqualified," he demanded.

In June 2015, a major row was sparked off on the issue of 'Office of Profit' after President Pranab Mukherjee rejected the government's bill to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the 'Office of Profit' definition.

The government sought through the bill an amendment to the Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, 1997, so as to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the definition of 'Office of Profit'.

The AAP has maintained that none of the Parliamentary Secretaries was given "pecuniary benefits" and the appointment of the party legislators as Parliamentary Secretaries did not amount to creation of a "public office".

--IANS

am-aks/vgu/dg

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

AAP MLAs get time till October 17 to respond

The Commission of (ECI) has given 21 (AAP) legislators in till October 17 to explain why they should not be disqualified from the assembly after their appointment as Parliamentary Secretaries.

In the notice issued on Monday, the ECI also told petitioner Prashant Patel to submit his rejoinder to the 21 AAP lawmakers' reply by October 21.

The AAP legislators had earlier written to the Commission requesting for more time to file their replies, following which the extension till October 17 has been given.

"It may be noted that if no reply is received by the aforesaid date, it will be presumed that you have nothing to say in this matter and the Commission will take appropriate action without any further reference to you," the EC notice said.

After coming to power in February 2015, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's government appointed 21 party lawmakers as the Parliamentary Secretaries, saying this would facilitate smooth functioning of the government but would not cause any burden on the exchequer.

The High Court in September quashed the appointment of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries. The AAP, however, refused to comment over the issue and maintained that it was an ongoing process.

After the notice, (BJP) on Thursday reiterated its demand of "disqualification" of the 21 AAP legislators in "office of profit" matter.

"It is already proven that they (AAP MLAs) were holding office of profit so we are demanding that their membership must be cancelled," BJP chief Satish Upadhyay told IANS.

Congress legal affairs in-charge, Aman Panwar told IANS that the 21 AAP MLAs were illegally appointed as parliamentary secretaries in the government.

"Under the law, they must be disqualified," he demanded.

In June 2015, a major row was sparked off on the issue of 'Office of Profit' after President Pranab Mukherjee rejected the government's bill to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the 'Office of Profit' definition.

The government sought through the bill an amendment to the Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, 1997, so as to exclude the post of Parliamentary Secretary from the definition of 'Office of Profit'.

The AAP has maintained that none of the Parliamentary Secretaries was given "pecuniary benefits" and the appointment of the party legislators as Parliamentary Secretaries did not amount to creation of a "public office".

--IANS

am-aks/vgu/dg

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard