ALSO READSlaughterhouses matter: Allahabad HC orders UP Govt. to issue licenses Family of rape-accused Gayatri Prajapati approach Yogi Adityanath seeking justice BJP springs surprise, Yogi Adityanath to be the new UP CM UP: Yogi Adityanath begins Sunday morning among cows UP CM Yogi Adityanath draws parallel between Surya Namaskar, Namaz
In his public interest litigation (PIL), Sanjay Sharma, a social activist has alleged that since both Adityanath and Maurya were Lok Sabha MPs and were drawing salaries and other perks, they do not have a right to be in the positions of power in the state government.
The petitioner has cited the Prevention of Disqualification Act of 1959 and has called for nullifying the appointment of both Adityanath and Maurya. While Adityanath is an MP from Gorakhpur, Maurya is a Lok Sabha member from Phoolpur in Allahabad.
The case was heard by the bench of Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice Virendra Kumar II and after hearing the Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh Raghvendra Singh, the court served notice to the Attorney General of India to put forth his views on the matter as there were no precedents on it, Sanjay Sharma, the petitioner told IANS.
He added that Adityanath and Maurya were not resigning their Lok Sabha seats to be able to vote in the July presidential election.
The hearing has now been listed for May 24.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)