Business Standard

HC notice to UGC, JNU against M.Phil, Ph.D notification

IANS  |  New Delhi 

The High on Tuesday issued notice to the Central government, the UGC and JNU on a plea challenging UGC notification that put a cap on number of M.Phil and Ph.D research scholars a professor can guide.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra sought response from government, University Grant Commission and Jawaharlal Nehru University and posted the matter for hearing on April 28.

The plea filed by the CPI-M-affiliated Students' Federation of India (SFI) and some aspiring M.Phil and Ph.D students of JNU and University challenged the constitutional validity of the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.Phil and Ph.D degree) Regulations 2016 which came into effect from July 5, 2016.

They have contended that the UGC notification "threatens to put their future in jeopardy" as they would not be able to find research supervisors/guides due to the said notification.

The SFI and students argued that the notification's ramifications will extend beyond existing researchers and lead to few admissions of research aspirants in the current academic session.

Compared to 970 seats in the last academic year for these two degrees, this year the number of seats has dropped to 102 due to capping of the number of students per research supervisor for M.Phil and Ph.D courses, said the plea.

The admission regulations were contrary to the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy, said the plea terming regulations as "irrational, unreasonable and arbitrary".

The petition further argued that the cap was put without consulting or informing students and without improving infrastructure.

It also challenged various provisions of the regulations including those laying down a minimum percentage requirement of 55 per cent for general category and 50 per cent for reserved category as well as the 100 per cent weightage given to viva-voce exam.

--IANS

gt/vd

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

HC notice to UGC, JNU against M.Phil, Ph.D notification

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Central government, the UGC and JNU on a plea challenging UGC notification that put a cap on number of M.Phil and Ph.D research scholars a professor can guide.

The High on Tuesday issued notice to the Central government, the UGC and JNU on a plea challenging UGC notification that put a cap on number of M.Phil and Ph.D research scholars a professor can guide.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra sought response from government, University Grant Commission and Jawaharlal Nehru University and posted the matter for hearing on April 28.

The plea filed by the CPI-M-affiliated Students' Federation of India (SFI) and some aspiring M.Phil and Ph.D students of JNU and University challenged the constitutional validity of the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.Phil and Ph.D degree) Regulations 2016 which came into effect from July 5, 2016.

They have contended that the UGC notification "threatens to put their future in jeopardy" as they would not be able to find research supervisors/guides due to the said notification.

The SFI and students argued that the notification's ramifications will extend beyond existing researchers and lead to few admissions of research aspirants in the current academic session.

Compared to 970 seats in the last academic year for these two degrees, this year the number of seats has dropped to 102 due to capping of the number of students per research supervisor for M.Phil and Ph.D courses, said the plea.

The admission regulations were contrary to the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy, said the plea terming regulations as "irrational, unreasonable and arbitrary".

The petition further argued that the cap was put without consulting or informing students and without improving infrastructure.

It also challenged various provisions of the regulations including those laying down a minimum percentage requirement of 55 per cent for general category and 50 per cent for reserved category as well as the 100 per cent weightage given to viva-voce exam.

--IANS

gt/vd

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

HC notice to UGC, JNU against M.Phil, Ph.D notification

The High on Tuesday issued notice to the Central government, the UGC and JNU on a plea challenging UGC notification that put a cap on number of M.Phil and Ph.D research scholars a professor can guide.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra sought response from government, University Grant Commission and Jawaharlal Nehru University and posted the matter for hearing on April 28.

The plea filed by the CPI-M-affiliated Students' Federation of India (SFI) and some aspiring M.Phil and Ph.D students of JNU and University challenged the constitutional validity of the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.Phil and Ph.D degree) Regulations 2016 which came into effect from July 5, 2016.

They have contended that the UGC notification "threatens to put their future in jeopardy" as they would not be able to find research supervisors/guides due to the said notification.

The SFI and students argued that the notification's ramifications will extend beyond existing researchers and lead to few admissions of research aspirants in the current academic session.

Compared to 970 seats in the last academic year for these two degrees, this year the number of seats has dropped to 102 due to capping of the number of students per research supervisor for M.Phil and Ph.D courses, said the plea.

The admission regulations were contrary to the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy, said the plea terming regulations as "irrational, unreasonable and arbitrary".

The petition further argued that the cap was put without consulting or informing students and without improving infrastructure.

It also challenged various provisions of the regulations including those laying down a minimum percentage requirement of 55 per cent for general category and 50 per cent for reserved category as well as the 100 per cent weightage given to viva-voce exam.

--IANS

gt/vd

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22