ALSO READJNU missing student case: Court seeks students' response on CBI plea Talwars' lawyer had filed contempt plea against CBI court judge Court gives CBI two months for sanction against ex-DoS official Prison riot: Indrani Mukerjea moves special CBI court claiming assault Court directs CBI Director of Prosecution to appear on Tuesday
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Samar Vishal reserved order after counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and JNU students concluded their arguments.
The CBI has sought a lie-detection test on the nine students to ascertain facts related to the case.
Students' counsel Vishwa Bhushan Arya and Ujjwal Kumar told the court that, as per the National Human Rights Commission, the lie-detector test is not authorised by law and must be regarded as illegal unless it is voluntarily accepted.
The counsel urged the court to dismiss the plea, terming it "premature and not maintainable".
The counsel said that summoning the students to record their consent or refusal is nothing but coercive exercise.
Ahmed, 27, an MSc First Year student, went missing on October 15 last year after an alleged fight with members of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-affiliated Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad.
However, the students body denied any involvement.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)