Business Standard

Manipur staged gunfights: SC wants officers named in FIR

IANS  |  New Delhi 

The on Monday directed the CBI's SIT to file a supplementary FIR naming the officers involved in the alleged extra-judicial killings and staged gunfights by the Army, Rifles and Police in

A bench of Justice and Justice asked the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to file the supplementary FIR in the existing FIRs which will include the name of officers or commanding officers of the units, and told the NHRC to also assist the team.

The top court said the judicial inquiries and the Gauhati High Court's findings have named the of the unit of the battalion (involved in the alleged shooting) or the who shot "but these personnel have not been named in the FIR".

The SIT should file a supplementary FIR naming the personnel involved, it said.

The court was hearing a PIL seeking a probe into as many as 1,528 cases of extra-judicial killings in

The court's direction came after Menaka Guruswamy, the amicus curiae assisting the court in the matter, said that 11 FIRs were registered in March but none named any Army, rifle or police personnel despite their being specifically named in the judicial inquiries' reports and the high court's findings.

These 11 FIRs were registered on the basis of judicial inquiries and cases in which the had given its findings.

Taking note of the submissions of Guruswamy that FIRs were registered against "unknown personnel", the bench said that going by the records of the judicial inquiries, the high court's order and witnesses "there is not just the name of offending unit but also the under whose command it was done".

"The fact of the matter is he (officer) shot. He is the man who shot and accepted it. You know the commander of the unit, you also know the man in question. But it's not in the FIR," the bench told Maninder Singh, appearing for the SIT.

The apex court said if the SIT doesn't name the personnel in the FIR, "who are you going to question tomorrow"?

The bench, which had asked the (NHRC) to depute three persons with the SIT to carry out investigations in 13 of the 42 cases, said: "We would like the NHRC to get involved in other cases too."

When the ASG said that "substantial progress" has been made in the cases filed by the SIT and it has been collecting evidence, examining witnesses and waiting for forensic reports, the court sought the presence of the of the to ensure there was no delay in the reports.

The ASG also told the bench that the FIRs lodged against the victims will be cancelled. On February 12, the court slammed the SIT for not properly probing the issue and asked why FIRs were lodged against the victims and not against the officers.

The bench also took note of the contentions of the SIT that it was having some difficulty in understanding the local language in and asked it to approach the University which may help in translation.

The court then posted the matter for May 11.

On July 14, 2017, the apex court set up the SIT comprising five (CBI) officers and ordered registration of FIRs and investigation into the alleged extra-judicial killings in

The court had ordered the registration of FIRs in 81 cases including 32 probed by a Commission of Inquiry, 32 investigated by judicial authorities, 11 in which compensation was awarded and six probed by the commission headed by former

--IANS

gt/him/bg

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Mon, April 16 2018. 19:34 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU