Business Standard

SC notice to Justice Katju for criticising verdict

IANS  |  New Delhi 

For the first time in its history, the Supreme on Monday issued notice to its former judge, Justice Markandey Katju, for claiming that the top "grievously erred" in setting aside the death sentence of a man accused of rape and of a 23-year-old woman in 2011.

Katju made the comment to a TV channel and later put it up in his Facebook post.

Asking the office to register the Facebook post as a suo motu review petition of its September 15 verdict, the apex bench of Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Prafulla C. Pant and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit noted Justice Katju as saying that the "Supreme has grievously erred in law by not holding Govindaswamy guilty of murder."

Justice Katju in his Facebook post took a critical view of the top setting aside the death sentence of Govindaswamy. He differed with the court, which reasoned that it has not been proven that the accused had intention to kill, and therefore he cannot be held guilty of murder.

Taking a contrary view, Justice Katju in his Facebook post said, "What the has overlooked is that Section 300 IPC, which defines murder, has 4 parts, and only the first part requires intention to kill."

He said, "If any of the other 3 parts are established, it will be even if there was no intention to kill. It is regrettable that the has not read Section 300 carefully."

Justice Katju also said, "The judgment needs to be reviewed in an open hearing."

Saying that the views expressed by Justice Katju, a former judge of the top court, "needs to be treated with greatest of respect and consideration", the requested Justice Katju to appear in person on November 11 at 1400 hours and "participate in the proceedings as to whether the judgment and order dated 15th September, 2016, passed by this Bench a suffers from any fundamental flaw so as to require exercise of the review jurisdiction."

The order came on the conclusion of the hearing on government's plea seeking recall of September 15 verdict by which Govindaswamy's death sentence was set aside.

The top on September 15 set aside the death sentence of the man accused of rape and of a 23-year-old woman in 2011, exonerating him of charges but said he would undergo life imprisonment for rape.

Govindaswamy had been convicted and sentenced to death by a trial court, and the sentence was confirmed by the High Court.

Govindaswamy had raped and murdered the woman when she was travelling by train from Ernakulam to Shornur on February 1, 2011, to attend her betrothal ceremony the following day.

--IANS

pk/rn/vt

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

SC notice to Justice Katju for criticising verdict

For the first time in its history, the Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to its former judge, Justice Markandey Katju, for claiming that the top court "grievously erred" in setting aside the death sentence of a Kerala man accused of rape and murder of a 23-year-old woman in 2011.

For the first time in its history, the Supreme on Monday issued notice to its former judge, Justice Markandey Katju, for claiming that the top "grievously erred" in setting aside the death sentence of a man accused of rape and of a 23-year-old woman in 2011.

Katju made the comment to a TV channel and later put it up in his Facebook post.

Asking the office to register the Facebook post as a suo motu review petition of its September 15 verdict, the apex bench of Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Prafulla C. Pant and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit noted Justice Katju as saying that the "Supreme has grievously erred in law by not holding Govindaswamy guilty of murder."

Justice Katju in his Facebook post took a critical view of the top setting aside the death sentence of Govindaswamy. He differed with the court, which reasoned that it has not been proven that the accused had intention to kill, and therefore he cannot be held guilty of murder.

Taking a contrary view, Justice Katju in his Facebook post said, "What the has overlooked is that Section 300 IPC, which defines murder, has 4 parts, and only the first part requires intention to kill."

He said, "If any of the other 3 parts are established, it will be even if there was no intention to kill. It is regrettable that the has not read Section 300 carefully."

Justice Katju also said, "The judgment needs to be reviewed in an open hearing."

Saying that the views expressed by Justice Katju, a former judge of the top court, "needs to be treated with greatest of respect and consideration", the requested Justice Katju to appear in person on November 11 at 1400 hours and "participate in the proceedings as to whether the judgment and order dated 15th September, 2016, passed by this Bench a suffers from any fundamental flaw so as to require exercise of the review jurisdiction."

The order came on the conclusion of the hearing on government's plea seeking recall of September 15 verdict by which Govindaswamy's death sentence was set aside.

The top on September 15 set aside the death sentence of the man accused of rape and of a 23-year-old woman in 2011, exonerating him of charges but said he would undergo life imprisonment for rape.

Govindaswamy had been convicted and sentenced to death by a trial court, and the sentence was confirmed by the High Court.

Govindaswamy had raped and murdered the woman when she was travelling by train from Ernakulam to Shornur on February 1, 2011, to attend her betrothal ceremony the following day.

--IANS

pk/rn/vt

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

SC notice to Justice Katju for criticising verdict

For the first time in its history, the Supreme on Monday issued notice to its former judge, Justice Markandey Katju, for claiming that the top "grievously erred" in setting aside the death sentence of a man accused of rape and of a 23-year-old woman in 2011.

Katju made the comment to a TV channel and later put it up in his Facebook post.

Asking the office to register the Facebook post as a suo motu review petition of its September 15 verdict, the apex bench of Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Prafulla C. Pant and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit noted Justice Katju as saying that the "Supreme has grievously erred in law by not holding Govindaswamy guilty of murder."

Justice Katju in his Facebook post took a critical view of the top setting aside the death sentence of Govindaswamy. He differed with the court, which reasoned that it has not been proven that the accused had intention to kill, and therefore he cannot be held guilty of murder.

Taking a contrary view, Justice Katju in his Facebook post said, "What the has overlooked is that Section 300 IPC, which defines murder, has 4 parts, and only the first part requires intention to kill."

He said, "If any of the other 3 parts are established, it will be even if there was no intention to kill. It is regrettable that the has not read Section 300 carefully."

Justice Katju also said, "The judgment needs to be reviewed in an open hearing."

Saying that the views expressed by Justice Katju, a former judge of the top court, "needs to be treated with greatest of respect and consideration", the requested Justice Katju to appear in person on November 11 at 1400 hours and "participate in the proceedings as to whether the judgment and order dated 15th September, 2016, passed by this Bench a suffers from any fundamental flaw so as to require exercise of the review jurisdiction."

The order came on the conclusion of the hearing on government's plea seeking recall of September 15 verdict by which Govindaswamy's death sentence was set aside.

The top on September 15 set aside the death sentence of the man accused of rape and of a 23-year-old woman in 2011, exonerating him of charges but said he would undergo life imprisonment for rape.

Govindaswamy had been convicted and sentenced to death by a trial court, and the sentence was confirmed by the High Court.

Govindaswamy had raped and murdered the woman when she was travelling by train from Ernakulam to Shornur on February 1, 2011, to attend her betrothal ceremony the following day.

--IANS

pk/rn/vt

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard