Business Standard

SC rejects plea for SIT probe, says image of top court damaged

IANS  |  New Delhi 

The Supreme on Tuesday junked a petition, terming it as "scandalous", for seeking an SIT probe into the allegations of graft involving a retired High judge and observed that the whole controversy has damaged the image of the top judiciary and created doubts about its integrity.

"Unnecessary doubts about the integrity of the institution have been created," the bench of R.K. Agrawal, Justice Arun Mishra and Justice A.M. Khanwilkar observed, as it deprecated the by lawyer Kamini Jaiswal.

Observing that nobody, including the judges of the top court, were above law, Justice Mishra pronouncing the judgment also said 'No' to contempt against the lawyers - Prashant Bhushan and Jaiswal - with a hope that "all will unitedly work for the welfare of the institution (top court)".

Saying that "none of us" in the higher echelons was above law, the said, "It is the duty of both the Bar and the Bench, to protect the dignity of the entire judicial system".

"We find that filing of such petitions and the zest with which it is pursued, has brought the entire system in the last few days to unrest. An effort was made to create ripples in this court; serious and unwanted shadow of doubt has been created for no good reason whatsoever by way of filing the which was wholly scandalous and ought not to have been filed in such a method and manner. It is against the settled proposition of law," said Justice Mishra speaking for the bench.

In case "majesty of our judicial system" has to survive, the said that such kind of petitions should not have been preferred that too against the settled proposition of law laid down by this

Regretting that "unnecessary" aspersions were cast without proper verification of the facts, the took a dim view of the plea for recusal of Justice Khanwilkar from the bench on the grounds that he along with Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud had heard the matter relating to a Lucknow-based private medical college linked to the admission scam.

Saying that it was "far fetched and too tenuous" that any judge of this court, much less Justice Khanwilkar, has any interest in the subject matter before them, the said: "There is no room for reasonable suspicion even in remote, and the argument is simply too derogatory to be made, probably that has been made anyhow, for somehow to protect the case and to bring disrepute to this "

"We cannot fall prey to such unscrupulous devices adopted by the litigants, so as to choose the benches, as that is a real threat to the very existence of the system itself and it would be denigrated in case we succumb to such pressure tactics," the judgment said.

Pointing to the scenarios created by two petitions as "disturbing", which has "unnecessarily brought into disrepute" the entire judiciary for "no good cause whatsoever", the said: "It passes comprehension, how it was that the petitioner presumed, that there is an FIR lodged against any public functionary."

Referring to averment that FIR was against the highest judicial functionaries, the said, "We do not find reflection of any name of the Judge of this in the FIR."

Recalling its earlier judgment, the said, "There is no question of registering any FIR against any sitting Judge of the High or of this as it is not permissible as per the law laid down by a Constitution Bench."

--IANS

pk/rn

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Tue, November 14 2017. 19:58 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU