Business Standard

Zuckerberg vows to revamp Facebook, admits his own data was shared (Roundup)

IANS  |  Washington 

Stressing that there is an "arms race" with and it was important to make sure no one interferes in any more elections including in India, said on Wednesday that his own personal data was "improperly shared".

Appearing before the and Commerce Committee on Wednesday -- his second testimony before the US in less than 24 hours -- told the lawmakers that his own personal data was part of 87 million users' that was "improperly shared" with British political consultancy firm

"We don't sell the data. We use the data that people put into the system in order to make them more relevant. I believe people own their content," he told the House panel.

Earlier, during the first five-hour marathon session at US late on Tuesday, the conveyed his concerns about the upcoming elections globally.

"The most important thing I care about right now is making sure no one interferes in the various 2018 elections around the world," he told a 44-Senator panel.

"As long as there are people sitting in whose job it is to try and interfere with elections around the world, this is going to be an ongoing conflict," the 33-year-old billionaire said as he prepared to testify again, this time before a House panel.

has earlier said will ensure that its platform is not misused to influence elections in and elsewhere.

on Monday said: "Our goals are to understand Facebook's impact on upcoming elections -- like Brazil, India, and the US midterms -- and to inform our future product and policy decisions."

The company's stock was up about 2 per cent even before sat down. It moved even higher when he started addressing the questions from lawmakers and finished the day with a 4.5 per cent gain.

It added $21.3 billion to Facebook's market value and $3 billion to Zuckerberg's personal net worth, Fortune reported.

In his opening remarks at US Congress, he said: "is an idealistic and optimistic company. For most of our existence, we focused on all of the good that connecting people can do.

"But it's clear now that we didn't do enough to prevent these tools from being used as harm as well.

"That goes for fake news, for interference in elections and we didn't take a broad enough view of our responsibility and that was a big mistake and it was my mistake and I'm sorry," the said.

With 44 Senators asking questions, and just five minutes of time allotted for each, there was limited potential for follow-up questions to and grilling of the during the testimony at

"It's not enough to just connect people. We have to make sure those connections are positive. It's not enough to give people a voice. We have to make sure people aren't using it to harm people or spread disinformation," told the Senators.

was getting to the bottom of exactly what did and telling everyone affected.

"What we know now is that improperly accessed information by buying it. When we first contacted Cambridge Analytica, they told us they had deleted the data," said.

He said the company made big changes in the platform in 2014 that have prevented this specific situation with from occurring again.

confirmed that his company was cooperating with in his investigation into Russia's meddling in the 2016 US

Asked by Democratic Senator while he testified on Capitol Hill whether had been served subpoenas for the special counsel, responded "yes," but later clarified: "I am actually not aware of a subpoena. I'm aware that there may be, but we are working with them."

Asked if his employees had been interviewed, he again responded yes but added: "I have not," reported.

He continued: "I want to be careful here because our work with the is confidential and I want to make sure that in an open session I'm not revealing something that is confidential."

Senator John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, asked if he is willing to make a commitment to protect political speech from "all different corners".

agreed: "If there's an imminent threat of harm, we're going to take a conservative position on that and make sure that we flag that and understand that more broadly.

"I don't want anyone at our company to make any decisions based on the political ideology of the content."

On a question if has a political bias, he said the platform's goal was not to engage in political speech.

said he understands the concerns, especially because "and tech industry is located in Silicon Valley, which is an extremely Left-leaning place".

But he said he tries to make sure does not have any bias in the work that it does.

--IANS

na-sku-soni/him/vd

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Wed, April 11 2018. 22:12 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU