Close

LOGIN

Remember me
Not a member?
or
Connect using:
Why BS?

We encourage visitors to register on Business Standard. Registering on the site is absolutely Free and offers you the following benefits.

Free Daily E-newsletter

Breaking News Alerts in your Inbox

Post Comments and Share your Feedback

Your Personal Business Standard Page

Free Portfolio of Stocks, Equity and Commodities Derivatives

Access Premium Services

Receive Selective Offers from our Third Party Premium Advertisers

Get Invited to Business Standard Events

Close

FORGOT PASSWORD?

Not a member?

Greenman Sachs

Related News

is making a dash to invest in renewable energy projects. It says it will invest $40 billion of its own and clients’ money over a decade. The Wall Street firm isn’t above self-serving spin, but it’s also never far from the money. With solar and nearing cost levels that are competitive with , clean energy could burnish Goldman’s bottom line, as well as its green credentials.

A degree of cynicism over Thursday’s announcement is warranted. The firm helped funnel $4.8 billion to clean energy firms in 2011, so its latest pledge, averaged over 10 years, would actually represent a drop in investment in the sector. But in fact Goldman has a record of being better than its word on environmental investments. A $1 billion commitment in 2005 turned into the deployment of $24 billion of financing by the end of 2011.

And, of course, money talks. Goldman’s timing looks spot on. Solar and wind power seem close to a tipping point in many parts of the world, including the firm’s home market.

In sunny US states like California, for instance, the price of solar electricity under long-term contracts has plunged from about 17 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2010 to around eight cents now, according to . It would cost a couple of cents more without government incentives, but it’s now within striking distance of electricity generated from natural gas. At today’s low gas prices, that runs around six cents per kilowatt-hour.

Technological improvements have also driven the cost of wind energy generation down by about a fifth over the past decade, again to within easy range of gas-fired generation even in parts of the United States where the winds aren’t especially reliable, according to the . An added major selling point is that once generation equipment is installed, these prices are locked in for decades, since the sun and wind are free. The same cannot be said of America’s gas or even coal, let alone oil. With renewable energy looking like it will soon hold its own competitively, Goldman’s latest $40 billion promise is one it should have little trouble keeping.

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|

Read More

Historical mistake

UK shouldn't quit the EU - it should join the euro

Back to Top

Quick Links

Have Your Say Rss icon




Image4

Will L K Advani's resignation weaken BJP's poll prospects in 2014?

Financial X-Ray Rss icon

Regulatory environment improving for telcos

Trai lowering of roaming tariffs likely to have negligible impact on financials as existing headline tariffs are lower

RBI opts for a strategic timeout on rate cuts

From inflation, central bank shifts focus to rupee stability and capital flows

Back to Top