New Document top_band
 
Business Standard

Roger Cohen: Forget the fiscal cliff - the future still belongs to the United States

Poised to become a net energy exporter, and with a population that will be younger than Europe's or China's, the US is very far from decline

Related News

With the running a huge deficit, the incomes of the “99 per cent” stalled, the approaching fast, the nation’s dependence on external financing from acute, and Washington gridlock a recurrent political condition, this may seem like an odd moment to be bullish on America. But I am.

The main reason is the huge shift already underway in the politics of energy and oil. The change has been underappreciated. It may be summed up in a single sentence buried in the 166-page study* just published by the US National Intelligence Council: “By 2020, the US could emerge as a major energy exporter.”

That is just eight years away and, yes, you read that right, exporter of energy, not importer. According to the US Energy Information Administration, the United States imports around 8 million barrels of crude oil a day, so the predicted turnabout is dramatic. With those imports, notably those from the Middle East, go forms of political dependency and expediency that have long exacted a price on the United States.

Several developments lie behind this looming geostrategic shift. The first is the advent of shale oil and natural gas production made possible by new technologies. The second is the increase in oil production from deep water offshore operations. Between them, by somewhere between 2020 and 2030, these new sources are expected almost to double US domestic oil production, currently running at between six and seven million barrels a day.

Combine that with improved mileage for cars and a switch in trucking to cheap liquefied natural gas and a once unimaginable scenario becomes reality: The United States wipes out its need for oil imports. Eliminating need, of course, does not necessarily mean eliminating imports completely but it does mean a change in American leverage.

“This is a transformative development,” Amy Myers Jaffe, the executive director of energy and sustainability at the University of California Davis, told me. “We see ourselves increasingly as this weakened country dependent on faraway events. But as we become energy independent our sense of our own power and freedom of movement will change — and with it our foreign policy in ways that are hard to predict. Oil is a different issue when it is not your own problem anymore.”

In other words, think of the world before the first oil shock of 1973 to get some notion of what is afoot.

In the Middle East, the equation switches when China becomes more dependent on a steady oil supply and more concerned on an economic basis about the region than the United States.

Right now, as Jaffe noted, China can operate in the knowledge that Middle Eastern instability costs the United States above all. If the Iran problem festers, for example, so be it. But facing a United States that is energy independent, as its own energy needs and costs rise, Beijing may well be prodded into a different strategic assessment.

Moreover, if oil prices fall over time, which seems plausible, the power and leverage of countries including Iran and Saudi Arabia will be diminished.

Several caveats are in order. First, shale oil and gas production depends on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, whose environmental impact causes public unease. How far this will slow development is unclear.

Second, the power shift from the West toward the emergent powers of Asia over the next couple of decades is inexorable. So energy independence for the United States is not going to alter its need to operate in an interdependent world devoid of any hegemonic power. Third, countries including Saudi Arabia and Venezuela own large refining operations in the United States; oil ties with them are intricate and unlikely to unravel.

Still, the self-image and economic prospects of an energy independent United States are going to see a sharp uptick. As the National Intelligence Council’s study says, “The prospect of significantly lower energy prices will have significant positive ripple effects for the US economy, encouraging companies to take advantage of lower energy prices to locate or relocate to the US.” Already there are significant signs of the relocation of manufacturing industry to the United States, drawn in part by cheap energy. The council estimates as many as 3 million jobs added by 2030.

Jaffe, who recently moved from Texas to California, has noticed another important trend: the rapid coming-together of what she called “App world and the energy world.” This fusion is creating, through innovative technologies, tremendous possibilities in energy saving. Chevron, headquartered in California, has already developed a big energy efficiency business precisely through this symbiosis.

So, if you need consoling, look beyond the cliff a few years to an energy independent United States whose capacity for reinvention is far from exhausted. If that is not enough to lift the clouds, ponder demographic trends. The predicted median age in the United States in 2030 is 39 — against 43 in China, 44 in Russia, 49 in Germany and 52 in Japan.

More people of working age using cheaper energy equals Advantage USA.


 

©2012 The New York Times News Service
*http://globaltrends2030.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/global-trends-2030-november2012.pdf  

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Read More

Devangshu Datta: Expect the unexpected

The market continued to mark time as the last settlement of 2012 passed by. There was negligible change in net index levels. Most traders are ...

Most Popular Columnists

Arvind Subramanian

Arvind Subramanian: A solution for the WTO
Arvind Subramanian

India is right to support its agriculture, but is going about it the wrong way

Shubhashis Gangopadhyay

Shubhashis Gangopadhyay: Trust in reform
Shubhashis Gangopadhyay

Labour law reform must go hand-in-hand with reforms that build workers' trust in management

Bharat Bhushan

Bharat Bhushan: Ambient intolerance goes up in the Modi era
Bharat Bhushan

With the temperature of Hindutva rising in the Indian social discourse, Narendra Modi is yet to become the inclusive leader that the high office he occupies demands of him

Advertisement

Columnists

Andrew Sheng & Xiao Geng

Andrew Sheng & Xiao Geng: China's subprime risks
Andrew Sheng & Xiao Geng

Shallow capital markets and skewed interest rates have led to over-investment in a few sectors

T S Vishwanath

T S Vishwanath: In search of policy space
T S Vishwanath

India has not shied away from a trade facilitation agreement. It is just looking for a decision that addresses its food security concerns as

Zorawar Daulet Singh

Zorawar Daulet Singh: BRICS is what we make of it
Zorawar Daulet Singh

The BRICS model will need to demonstrate the efficacy of a second alternative governance structure to reform the Bretton Woods legacy

Back to Top