Business Standard

T N Ninan: Make-believe solutions

The government has to deliver solutions that work, not indulge in action for the sake of demonstrating lack of paralysis

Related News

The government has been trying to get rid of the impression that it is caught in “policy paralysis”. Troubled airlines are to be rescued from their follies, and are to be assured supply of coal, while new policies have been announced for manufacturing, telecom, fertiliser… The frustrating result: solutions that look suspiciously like non-solutions, like the that has managed to do what no train does (go in reverse gear), and the opening and then quick slamming shut of doors for foreign investment in retail trade.

The latest in this list could be power projects, whose promoters faced coal linkage problems and met all the important people a few weeks ago, in a “See the Delhi Bhavans” circus. Then, in a 1970s-style solution, was asked to supply the coal, import it if needed. But Coal India is not in the import business, and its board has now decided to not do as ordered. In any case, the ports can’t handle that much imported coal, and pithead power stations cannot use imported coal because it is costlier even without the transport costs. End result: the power stations are where they were before their promoters met the prime minister.

The rescuing of airlines has been a similar story. The government has allowed the direct, duty-free import of aviation fuel, opened up the sector to investment by foreign airlines, and given loan guarantees to Air India. It may even have nudged government-owned banks to lend more to Kingfisher, but public outrage stopped the banks from throwing good money after bad (they bought shares over a year ago at about three times the current market price). And yet, both Kingfisher and Air India are in a mess; aircraft are grounded, employees have not been paid salaries and are asked to stay at home, staff unions are stirring, and travel agents are withholding bookings. Since neither airline has a survival strategy, it seems only a matter of time before one or other goes the way of East West and ModiLuft. And since Air India has a shareholder who believes in permanent life-support, the betting must be on Kingfisher justifying its name and diving into the water. Passengers will pay, as fares have started edging up. If the cost of flying goes up, there will be fewer air passengers, and the big new airports that counted on a certain level of traffic will see their calculations coming unstuck. Meanwhile, no aviation fuel has yet been imported by the airlines, and no foreign investors have come knocking.

As for the that was unveiled last summer, anyone heard of it since? Or of the new telecom policy that was unveiled shortly afterwards? And, any bets on whether the latest urea investment policy will end the decade-long famine in greenfield fertiliser investment? The highways people have tom-tommed the increase in road project clearances (6,200 km this year, up from 4,500 km last year); but a quarter of all road projects are stuck because of land acquisition problems, so some of those “cleared” projects aren’t really moving.

Too many patchwork solutions are being attempted. The bailout of the muffed share sale is but one example. There is no examination of the fundamentals (for example: why would anyone invest in bankrupt airlines?). Follow-up work is not in evidence: manufacturing cannot be given impetus unless a broad swath of measures is taken, and no single “policy” announcement can work the trick even if the industry minister claims modestly that his is the most important announcement since the industrial de-licensing of 1991. An economy that has lost momentum desperately needs solutions that work. The government has to deliver them, not indulge in action for the sake of demonstrating lack of paralysis.

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Read More

Sunil Sethi: Off-key and off-queue

Does bureaucracy ever give up? Not really. Do public-private partnerships take off in delivering essential services? Not if the public partner ends ...

Most Popular Columnists

T N Ninan

T N Ninan: Moving into South Asia
T N Ninan

In 1991, when India launched its economic reforms, China's economy was about 50 per cent bigger than India's. By 2000, the Chinese economy had grown ...

Mihir S Sharma

Mihir S Sharma: Trojan MNCs
Mihir S Sharma

Where Amazon was accused of being the seller and not the marketplace, Uber was accused of being the marketplace and not the seller

Jaimini Bhagwati

Jaimini Bhagwati: Let the rupee drift downward
Jaimini Bhagwati

The external sector remains vulnerable, and India cannot afford an overvalued rupee

Advertisement

Columnists

Ajay Chhibber

Ajay Chhibber: Stop talking about monetary policy
Ajay Chhibber

The Reserve Bank of India can affect neither growth nor inflation. Keep the focus on real-sector reform

Harsh V Pant

Harsh V Pant: Managing Mr Xi
Harsh V Pant

India's China policy will be effective only when India gets its other bilateral relationships in order. Managing China is not going to be easy

Probal Basak

Probal Basak: Bengal's political battle shifts to university campus
Probal Basak

Student protests at Jadavpur University could be the seed of a revival of the Left in West Bengal

Back to Top