Business Standard

T N Ninan: Personal accountability

The poor level of corporate as well as individual accountability needs to be addressed

Related News

This has been a season for corporate scandal. There is Barclays, which (along with other banks) gave out false numbers in the London financial market, so that its health would look better than it was. The bank now has to pay a penalty of $450 million, and its top three executives have resigned; more heads may roll — including at other banks. Then there is GlaxoSmithKline, which in various ways mis-sold eight or more drugs and withheld vital information, for which it now has to pay a huge fine of $3 billion. There is also the report on how was busy pushing its own mutual fund products, to the detriment of clients whose money the bank was managing. The same company is under investigation for whether it manipulated power markets, to inflate electricity costs. Some of these cases have a resonance here in India, where the most notable regulatory action has come from the Competition Commission. Eleven cement companies have been found guilty of rigging prices, and have been asked to pay Rs 6,300 crore in what is effectively a disgorgement order.

Corporate scandals are not new, here or anywhere else; there was a spate of them some years ago when Enron stood exposed and then imploded. Closer home, there was Satyam. And the financial sector showed itself to be fundamentally untrustworthy once the financial crisis erupted. It has become clear to all but the willfully blind that highly-paid managers did not understand the complicated financial “products” that they were selling and buying, and top managements were clueless about the risks attached to their business models. And as the case further shows, the prospect of big incentive payouts does cloud judgement and conduct.

But there is an interesting difference between the fallout of scandal here and elsewhere. At Barclays and at News International (Rupert Murdoch’s law-breaking publishing company), senior executives have paid for their actions by losing their jobs, and in some cases face criminal prosecution. In India there has been a clamour for booking Warren Anderson, head of at the time, for the Bhopal gas disaster, and in the case and several others went to jail instantly, pending trial. In the case of the cement companies, however, the penalty is only on the firms, whereas the managers in the companies who organised the cartel, and who are responsible for a situation in which the companies have been asked to pay Rs 6,300 crore as penalty, have gone scot-free. One could ask why. Surely, the top executives should be penalised too, and shareholders should be demanding that heads roll since it is their money that is being paid out. There is also the demonstration value of going after high-profile cases. Rajat Gupta’s conviction on the charge of insider trading has brought home the high personal risks attached to such misbehaviour, and forced India’s stock market regulator to realise that it has been treating cases of insider trading like little more than parking violations.

Finally, there is the case for tighter regulatory oversight. The pharmaceuticals business in India has been guilty of mis-selling, price gouging and bribing doctors for decades. Yet no drug company or its chief has ever been penalised. The partially privatised electricity business has already seen enough action to suggest that the regulators are not doing their job well. The life insurance business stored up many skeletons in its cupboard until the sector regulator stepped in with a hammer. The mining scandals in several states point to non-existent regulatory oversight. One could go on, but the point should be clear. The poor level of corporate as well as individual accountability needs to be addressed.

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

T N Ninan: Personal accountability

The poor level of corporate as well as individual accountability needs to be addressed

This has been a season for corporate scandal. There is Barclays, which (along with other banks) gave out false numbers in the London financial market, so that its health would look better than it was. The bank now has to pay a penalty of $450 million, and its top three executives have resigned; more heads may roll — including at other banks.

This has been a season for corporate scandal. There is Barclays, which (along with other banks) gave out false numbers in the London financial market, so that its health would look better than it was. The bank now has to pay a penalty of $450 million, and its top three executives have resigned; more heads may roll — including at other banks. Then there is GlaxoSmithKline, which in various ways mis-sold eight or more drugs and withheld vital information, for which it now has to pay a huge fine of $3 billion. There is also the report on how was busy pushing its own mutual fund products, to the detriment of clients whose money the bank was managing. The same company is under investigation for whether it manipulated power markets, to inflate electricity costs. Some of these cases have a resonance here in India, where the most notable regulatory action has come from the Competition Commission. Eleven cement companies have been found guilty of rigging prices, and have been asked to pay Rs 6,300 crore in what is effectively a disgorgement order.

Corporate scandals are not new, here or anywhere else; there was a spate of them some years ago when Enron stood exposed and then imploded. Closer home, there was Satyam. And the financial sector showed itself to be fundamentally untrustworthy once the financial crisis erupted. It has become clear to all but the willfully blind that highly-paid managers did not understand the complicated financial “products” that they were selling and buying, and top managements were clueless about the risks attached to their business models. And as the case further shows, the prospect of big incentive payouts does cloud judgement and conduct.

But there is an interesting difference between the fallout of scandal here and elsewhere. At Barclays and at News International (Rupert Murdoch’s law-breaking publishing company), senior executives have paid for their actions by losing their jobs, and in some cases face criminal prosecution. In India there has been a clamour for booking Warren Anderson, head of at the time, for the Bhopal gas disaster, and in the case and several others went to jail instantly, pending trial. In the case of the cement companies, however, the penalty is only on the firms, whereas the managers in the companies who organised the cartel, and who are responsible for a situation in which the companies have been asked to pay Rs 6,300 crore as penalty, have gone scot-free. One could ask why. Surely, the top executives should be penalised too, and shareholders should be demanding that heads roll since it is their money that is being paid out. There is also the demonstration value of going after high-profile cases. Rajat Gupta’s conviction on the charge of insider trading has brought home the high personal risks attached to such misbehaviour, and forced India’s stock market regulator to realise that it has been treating cases of insider trading like little more than parking violations.

Finally, there is the case for tighter regulatory oversight. The pharmaceuticals business in India has been guilty of mis-selling, price gouging and bribing doctors for decades. Yet no drug company or its chief has ever been penalised. The partially privatised electricity business has already seen enough action to suggest that the regulators are not doing their job well. The life insurance business stored up many skeletons in its cupboard until the sector regulator stepped in with a hammer. The mining scandals in several states point to non-existent regulatory oversight. One could go on, but the point should be clear. The poor level of corporate as well as individual accountability needs to be addressed.

image

Read More

Nilanjana S Roy: Readability, or lasting value?

The strongest argument in favour of reading the best, most well-crafted, most challenging books you could find was made by the late Dom Moraes. We ...

Recommended for you

Most Popular Columns

T N Ninan

T N Ninan: Don't subsidise, build
T N Ninan

When there is an enormous shortage of public hospitals, when state expenditure on health care is abysmally low by any international yardstick, tax money should be used to set up public hospitals

T C A Srinivasa-Raghavan

T C A Srinivasa-Raghavan: Consumer politics comes to the internet
T C A Srinivasa-Raghavan

In purely economic and legal terms, net neutrality is a flawed idea. Its politics is based on user greed

Jaimini Bhagwati

Jaimini Bhagwati: Effective economic diplomacy
Jaimini Bhagwati

We need a systematic approach for selecting and training officers to promote foreign trade and investment, and facilitate scientific-technological tie-ups

Columnists

Pratip Kar

Pratip Kar: Companies Act 2013 and internal financial controls
Pratip Kar

Implementation will be weakened if we fail to define terms used in the Act clearly and precisely

Dipayan Mitra

Dipayan Mitra: One bill to rule them all
Dipayan Mitra

A "One Bill" policy means that all financial transactions across India for trade of goods and services are billed through one universal billing ...

Gopalkrishna Gandhi

He stood out, he spoke up
Gopalkrishna Gandhi

Exploitation of the charisma of the great dead is not the monopoly of one party alone; it is a national political pastime. Dr Ambedkar's name ...

Back to Top