T N Ninan: Wrong price target

Policy makers in industrialised economies shifted focus from headline inflation to the underlying inflation trends, or core inflation a long time ago

Policy makers in the moved away a long time ago from focusing on headline — reflected through the wholesale price index. They recognised that this is influenced by in food and — as India is discovering. So policy makers shifted focus to the underlying trends, or core inflation. The wisdom of this is now evident in India; the regular headlines on soaring food (a cumulative price increase of over 40 per cent in the last two years) serve to highlight the stress on household budgets, but there is little that the government can do about onion and vegetable prices if farmers do not respond to the incentive provided by higher prices and produce more. Macro-economic policy has to focus on the underlying trends, yet there is hardly any attention given to this in even the business press.

Consider the data for December. Wholesale price was 8.4 per cent, with food prices up 13.5 per cent and fuel 11.2 per cent. Non-food manufactured items were up only 5.3 per cent. If that last number reflects India’s version of core inflation, the question to be asked is the Goldilocks question: is it too high, too low, or about right? But the question is not asked because the government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) continue to focus their forecasts on the over-all rate. At this time last year, they were forecasting 5 per cent by March 2010. That was not to be. Then the put out a target of 5.5 per cent for March 2011; it has now changed that to 7 per cent. But the forecast continues to be with regard to the headline rate, which the cannot control (did anyone anticipate Egypt, and its impact on oil prices?). Surely, it is time policy makers shifted their focus to core inflation.

Time for some perspective. The rate in India over the past decade has averaged 5 per cent. The would like that trend rate to drop to the 4-4.5 per cent range. If one assumes that long-term in food and fuel will be more than in other items, core would have to be about 3.5 to 4 per cent. So it would appear that the underlying trend (at 5.3 per cent in December) was 1.3 percentage points too high, and the is right to be tightening monetary policy.

But the manufacturing sector does not function in a vacuum. It is affected by rising prices of commodities, which are its raw materials. In an environment of sharply rising fuel and food prices, and of commodity prices in general, producers of manufactured goods will be forced to increase their prices too. Thus, car companies and producers of consumer non-durables announced price hikes recently. It is unreasonable, therefore, to expect core to be 3.5 to 4 per cent when overall is not 4 to 4.5 per cent. When wholesale prices are 4 percentage points higher than the ideal, is it unreasonable if core sector is 1.3 percentage points higher than the preferred trend rate?

If the aims to hit a 7 per cent headline number by March when oil and food prices continue to climb, as they did in January, the only way to achieve the target headline number would be through a really tight monetary policy and much higher interest rates that will shrink manufactured product to no more than about 2 per cent. That will crimp demand with a vengeance and take away pricing power from producers. But is that what the country needs, or wants — especially when the impact on food and oil prices will be marginal?

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

T N Ninan: Wrong price target

Policy makers in industrialised economies shifted focus from headline inflation to the underlying inflation trends, or core inflation a long time ago

T N Ninan  |  New Delhi 

Policy makers in the moved away a long time ago from focusing on headline — reflected through the wholesale price index. They recognised that this is influenced by in food and — as India is discovering. So policy makers shifted focus to the underlying trends, or core inflation. The wisdom of this is now evident in India; the regular headlines on soaring food (a cumulative price increase of over 40 per cent in the last two years) serve to highlight the stress on household budgets, but there is little that the government can do about onion and vegetable prices if farmers do not respond to the incentive provided by higher prices and produce more. Macro-economic policy has to focus on the underlying trends, yet there is hardly any attention given to this in even the business press.

Consider the data for December. Wholesale price was 8.4 per cent, with food prices up 13.5 per cent and fuel 11.2 per cent. Non-food manufactured items were up only 5.3 per cent. If that last number reflects India’s version of core inflation, the question to be asked is the Goldilocks question: is it too high, too low, or about right? But the question is not asked because the government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) continue to focus their forecasts on the over-all rate. At this time last year, they were forecasting 5 per cent by March 2010. That was not to be. Then the put out a target of 5.5 per cent for March 2011; it has now changed that to 7 per cent. But the forecast continues to be with regard to the headline rate, which the cannot control (did anyone anticipate Egypt, and its impact on oil prices?). Surely, it is time policy makers shifted their focus to core inflation.

Time for some perspective. The rate in India over the past decade has averaged 5 per cent. The would like that trend rate to drop to the 4-4.5 per cent range. If one assumes that long-term in food and fuel will be more than in other items, core would have to be about 3.5 to 4 per cent. So it would appear that the underlying trend (at 5.3 per cent in December) was 1.3 percentage points too high, and the is right to be tightening monetary policy.

But the manufacturing sector does not function in a vacuum. It is affected by rising prices of commodities, which are its raw materials. In an environment of sharply rising fuel and food prices, and of commodity prices in general, producers of manufactured goods will be forced to increase their prices too. Thus, car companies and producers of consumer non-durables announced price hikes recently. It is unreasonable, therefore, to expect core to be 3.5 to 4 per cent when overall is not 4 to 4.5 per cent. When wholesale prices are 4 percentage points higher than the ideal, is it unreasonable if core sector is 1.3 percentage points higher than the preferred trend rate?

If the aims to hit a 7 per cent headline number by March when oil and food prices continue to climb, as they did in January, the only way to achieve the target headline number would be through a really tight monetary policy and much higher interest rates that will shrink manufactured product to no more than about 2 per cent. That will crimp demand with a vengeance and take away pricing power from producers. But is that what the country needs, or wants — especially when the impact on food and oil prices will be marginal?

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

T N Ninan: Wrong price target

Policy makers in industrialised economies shifted focus from headline inflation to the underlying inflation trends, or core inflation a long time ago

Policy makers in the industrialised economies moved away a long time ago from focusing on headline inflation — reflected through the wholesale price index. They recognised that this is influenced by volatile movements in food and fuel prices — as India is discovering. So policy makers shifted focus to the underlying inflation trends, or core inflation.

Policy makers in the moved away a long time ago from focusing on headline — reflected through the wholesale price index. They recognised that this is influenced by in food and — as India is discovering. So policy makers shifted focus to the underlying trends, or core inflation. The wisdom of this is now evident in India; the regular headlines on soaring food (a cumulative price increase of over 40 per cent in the last two years) serve to highlight the stress on household budgets, but there is little that the government can do about onion and vegetable prices if farmers do not respond to the incentive provided by higher prices and produce more. Macro-economic policy has to focus on the underlying trends, yet there is hardly any attention given to this in even the business press.

Consider the data for December. Wholesale price was 8.4 per cent, with food prices up 13.5 per cent and fuel 11.2 per cent. Non-food manufactured items were up only 5.3 per cent. If that last number reflects India’s version of core inflation, the question to be asked is the Goldilocks question: is it too high, too low, or about right? But the question is not asked because the government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) continue to focus their forecasts on the over-all rate. At this time last year, they were forecasting 5 per cent by March 2010. That was not to be. Then the put out a target of 5.5 per cent for March 2011; it has now changed that to 7 per cent. But the forecast continues to be with regard to the headline rate, which the cannot control (did anyone anticipate Egypt, and its impact on oil prices?). Surely, it is time policy makers shifted their focus to core inflation.

Time for some perspective. The rate in India over the past decade has averaged 5 per cent. The would like that trend rate to drop to the 4-4.5 per cent range. If one assumes that long-term in food and fuel will be more than in other items, core would have to be about 3.5 to 4 per cent. So it would appear that the underlying trend (at 5.3 per cent in December) was 1.3 percentage points too high, and the is right to be tightening monetary policy.

But the manufacturing sector does not function in a vacuum. It is affected by rising prices of commodities, which are its raw materials. In an environment of sharply rising fuel and food prices, and of commodity prices in general, producers of manufactured goods will be forced to increase their prices too. Thus, car companies and producers of consumer non-durables announced price hikes recently. It is unreasonable, therefore, to expect core to be 3.5 to 4 per cent when overall is not 4 to 4.5 per cent. When wholesale prices are 4 percentage points higher than the ideal, is it unreasonable if core sector is 1.3 percentage points higher than the preferred trend rate?

If the aims to hit a 7 per cent headline number by March when oil and food prices continue to climb, as they did in January, the only way to achieve the target headline number would be through a really tight monetary policy and much higher interest rates that will shrink manufactured product to no more than about 2 per cent. That will crimp demand with a vengeance and take away pricing power from producers. But is that what the country needs, or wants — especially when the impact on food and oil prices will be marginal?

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard