Business Standard

T S Vishwanath: Trading on infotech

The private sector of WTO member countries must come together to keep the IT sector barrier-free for global trade

Related News

The World Trade Organisation (WTO) celebrated 15 years of the (ITA) this year. This agreement has been a matter of deep discussion among analysts. However, it is a generally accepted fact that the benefit that India has derived from this agreement is immense. The agreement came into place in 1996 and India was a signatory to the agreement in 1997.

What was significant about this agreement was the fact that this was the first sectoral agreement that completely liberalised trade. This was the first agreement that brought tariffs down to zero on products under the process. The products it covered included computers, semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, telecommunication apparatus, instruments and apparatus, data-storage media and software, and parts and accessories.

The WTO report that has been released to mark a decade and a half of the agreement states that over the past 15 years, world exports of IT products have almost tripled in value and reached an estimated $1.4 trillion in 2010, accounting for 9.5 per cent of world merchandise trade. Together, the ITA participants account for 96 per cent of world trade in IT products. This, undoubtedly, has been a very significant agreement within the multilateral process.

There are now 74 members of the WTO – with Colombia joining as the latest participant – who are part of the plurilateral agreement. Among these countries, developing nations accounted for approximately 64 per cent of exports and 51 per cent of imports of ITA products in 2010.

While the ITA-I has been a big success, there hasn’t been much progress on the process that was started in 1998 to sign an ITA-II. The reason for this reluctance to move towards an ITA-II was primarily because some of the member countries, like the US, wanted to include consumer goods as also products like radar into this category. India has been opposed to the inclusion of consumer goods into the ITA-II agreement and New Delhi found support in Brussels on this issue. The expansion of the list has, however, found recent support among the private sector in the developed world. The World Electronics Forum, too, called for an expansion of this list this year .

However, before expanding the list, member countries may want to look at some of the other issues that may hamper the growth of global trade in this sector.

Some of these issues have been highlighted by the in the past. These include non-tariff barriers in the trade of these products as also the need to review the products, since this sector remains very dynamic and technology-driven.

The best way to move forward on the issue of non-tariff barriers would be for the private sector of member countries and potential member countries to come up with a joint list of products that hamper growth of information technology product trade. Having a combined list from the private sector of the ITA membership would help negotiators handle the issue better. However, it is important to note that given the diverse membership of the ITA, there is a need to understand that technological advancement in the products may differ between nations. Therefore, there is a need to look at different levels of technology available on a particular product across the membership before suggesting an international standard for the product.

One important issue that has been put forward by member countries, especially the developed countries at the WTO, has been the expansion of countries that are part of the ITA. To achieve that objective, it will be important to look at countries that could benefit from this sector.

Given the current state of affairs of the Doha Round, the ITA could serve as a platform for showcasing how liberalisation of trade has been beneficial for the member countries of the plurilateral agreement. The Director General of WTO, in his foreword in the publication, states that access to affordable IT equipment was instrumental in enabling India to become a powerhouse in consulting services, software development and other services

However, it must be remembered that for many supporters of the agreement there are enough contrary voices that say the agreement may have lead to the downfall of the hardware sector in some countries, including India.

The private sector has a lot to gain from this agreement and it has to keep working to ensure that this sector remains barrier-free for global trade.


The author is Principal Adviser with APJ-SLG Law Offices

Read more on:   
|
|
|
|
|

Read More

Ajit Balakrishnan: Indian schools' new social filter

The first sign of trouble appeared in January this year. Fifteen-year-old Alzira’s class teacher summoned her mother, Tina, and warned her that if ...

Most Popular Columns

Claude Smadja

Claude Smadja: The great oil price game
Claude Smadja

Will oil prices continue to decrease, and will Saudi Arabia then step in to arrest their decline?

Arvind Panagariya

Arvind Panagariya: MSMEs - separating wheat from chaff
Arvind Panagariya

Do not look for easy interventions to help small-scale enterprises - carry out the reforms that will let them grow big

Aditi Phadnis

Aditi Phadnis: Shiv Sena needs to go the 'rural' mile
Aditi Phadnis

If Uddhav Thackeray and the Shiv Sena want to hold on to their new base, they will have to listen to the voices coming from rural Maharashtra much more carefully

Advertisement

Columnists

Steven Johnson

Steven Johnson: Ebola's information paradox
Steven Johnson

Modern society is vulnerable to the threat of a pandemic because of the global connectedness of air travel; yet, we can alert the world to ...

T N Ninan

T N Ninan: Convenient 'truth-telling'
T N Ninan

In the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections, Narendra Modi talked of a "Jayanthi tax". He was taken to be referring to Jayanthi Natarajan, the ...

Devesh Kapur & Ananth Padmanabhan

Devesh Kapur & Ananth Padmanabhan: Dealing with regional bigotry
Devesh Kapur & Ananth Padmanabhan

Hate crimes against out-of-state migrants strike at the heart of the basic structure of the Constitution

Back to Top