Business Standard

The dishonest super-rich club of India

Nobody will believe Finance Ministry data that only 400,000 Indians earn more than Rs 20 lakh a year

Tarun Chaturvedi 

Tarun Chaturvedi

I had barely finished my lecture in support of Tax on Super Rich, when this gentleman sprang up from the audience and asked me how the finance ministry will define “Super Rich” in India. I managed to answer his question by reminding him that certain issues should be left to the mandarins at the ministry.
 
But the gentleman’s question kept haunting me – How do you identify “Super Rich” in India?


 
The cat was set among the pigeons by the Union finance minister when he indicated that the government might bring in some form of additional taxation for India’s super-rich. “We should consider the argument whether the very rich should be asked to pay a little more on some occasions,” he said.
 
Obviously, the Indian super-rich being upset at this idea registered their protests and some even said it would hurt entrepreneurship and in turn will halt economic development of the country. While Azim Premji remained the lone voice in support of taxing the super-rich.

Before we get into this controversy of right and wrong, fair and unfair, let us try and understand the numbers we are dealing with. According to the Finance Ministry data (for the year 2011-12), India has only about 400,000 taxpayers who earn more than Rs 20 lakh as income and pay taxes. This group accounted for around 63% of the taxes collected by the government and constituted only a miniscule 1.3% of the total taxpayers.

The above statistics clearly indicate that there is a huge amount of inequality in tax collection, which necessarily does not mirror the pattern of wealth distribution in India. Nobody will believe that India has only 400,000 who earn more than Rs 20 lakh annually – they would feel the number of is much higher. And they are absolutely right. The only problem is that India has only 400,000 honest and the rest are the dishonest super rich.

The proponents of tax on have constantly harped on the “ability to pay” canon of taxation in support of their demand. But what they are missing out is that in a country like India where the dishonest outnumber the honest by a large number, mindless application of this cannon of taxation would only act as a disincentive for the to accumulate wealth. At the best this would trigger a migration of the honest to the dishonest club.

The numbers clearly indicate that the entire debate of taxing the is quite worthless. Time and energy would be better spent in framing policies, which would help in converting the members of the dishonest club into members of the honest club.

It is only once this conversion is complete should the nation debate a tax on super rich.
 

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

The dishonest super-rich club of India

Nobody will believe Finance Ministry data that only 400,000 Indians earn more than Rs 20 lakh a year

I had barely finished my lecture in support of Tax on Super Rich, when this gentleman sprang up from the audience and asked me how the finance ministry will define “Super Rich” in India. I managed to answer his question by reminding him that certain issues should be left to the mandarins at the ministry. I had barely finished my lecture in support of Tax on Super Rich, when this gentleman sprang up from the audience and asked me how the finance ministry will define “Super Rich” in India. I managed to answer his question by reminding him that certain issues should be left to the mandarins at the ministry.
 
But the gentleman’s question kept haunting me – How do you identify “Super Rich” in India?
 
The cat was set among the pigeons by the Union finance minister when he indicated that the government might bring in some form of additional taxation for India’s super-rich. “We should consider the argument whether the very rich should be asked to pay a little more on some occasions,” he said.
 
Obviously, the Indian super-rich being upset at this idea registered their protests and some even said it would hurt entrepreneurship and in turn will halt economic development of the country. While Azim Premji remained the lone voice in support of taxing the super-rich.

Before we get into this controversy of right and wrong, fair and unfair, let us try and understand the numbers we are dealing with. According to the Finance Ministry data (for the year 2011-12), India has only about 400,000 taxpayers who earn more than Rs 20 lakh as income and pay taxes. This group accounted for around 63% of the taxes collected by the government and constituted only a miniscule 1.3% of the total taxpayers.

The above statistics clearly indicate that there is a huge amount of inequality in tax collection, which necessarily does not mirror the pattern of wealth distribution in India. Nobody will believe that India has only 400,000 who earn more than Rs 20 lakh annually – they would feel the number of is much higher. And they are absolutely right. The only problem is that India has only 400,000 honest and the rest are the dishonest super rich.

The proponents of tax on have constantly harped on the “ability to pay” canon of taxation in support of their demand. But what they are missing out is that in a country like India where the dishonest outnumber the honest by a large number, mindless application of this cannon of taxation would only act as a disincentive for the to accumulate wealth. At the best this would trigger a migration of the honest to the dishonest club.

The numbers clearly indicate that the entire debate of taxing the is quite worthless. Time and energy would be better spent in framing policies, which would help in converting the members of the dishonest club into members of the honest club.

It is only once this conversion is complete should the nation debate a tax on super rich.
 
image
Business Standard
177 22

The dishonest super-rich club of India

Nobody will believe Finance Ministry data that only 400,000 Indians earn more than Rs 20 lakh a year

I had barely finished my lecture in support of Tax on Super Rich, when this gentleman sprang up from the audience and asked me how the finance ministry will define “Super Rich” in India. I managed to answer his question by reminding him that certain issues should be left to the mandarins at the ministry.
 
But the gentleman’s question kept haunting me – How do you identify “Super Rich” in India?
 
The cat was set among the pigeons by the Union finance minister when he indicated that the government might bring in some form of additional taxation for India’s super-rich. “We should consider the argument whether the very rich should be asked to pay a little more on some occasions,” he said.
 
Obviously, the Indian super-rich being upset at this idea registered their protests and some even said it would hurt entrepreneurship and in turn will halt economic development of the country. While Azim Premji remained the lone voice in support of taxing the super-rich.

Before we get into this controversy of right and wrong, fair and unfair, let us try and understand the numbers we are dealing with. According to the Finance Ministry data (for the year 2011-12), India has only about 400,000 taxpayers who earn more than Rs 20 lakh as income and pay taxes. This group accounted for around 63% of the taxes collected by the government and constituted only a miniscule 1.3% of the total taxpayers.

The above statistics clearly indicate that there is a huge amount of inequality in tax collection, which necessarily does not mirror the pattern of wealth distribution in India. Nobody will believe that India has only 400,000 who earn more than Rs 20 lakh annually – they would feel the number of is much higher. And they are absolutely right. The only problem is that India has only 400,000 honest and the rest are the dishonest super rich.

The proponents of tax on have constantly harped on the “ability to pay” canon of taxation in support of their demand. But what they are missing out is that in a country like India where the dishonest outnumber the honest by a large number, mindless application of this cannon of taxation would only act as a disincentive for the to accumulate wealth. At the best this would trigger a migration of the honest to the dishonest club.

The numbers clearly indicate that the entire debate of taxing the is quite worthless. Time and energy would be better spent in framing policies, which would help in converting the members of the dishonest club into members of the honest club.

It is only once this conversion is complete should the nation debate a tax on super rich.
 

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard