Close

LOGIN

Remember me
Not a member?
or
Connect using:
Why BS?

We encourage visitors to register on Business Standard. Registering on the site is absolutely Free and offers you the following benefits.

Free Daily E-newsletter

Breaking News Alerts in your Inbox

Post Comments and Share your Feedback

Your Personal Business Standard Page

Free Portfolio of Stocks, Equity and Commodities Derivatives

Access Premium Services

Receive Selective Offers from our Third Party Premium Advertisers

Get Invited to Business Standard Events

Close

FORGOT PASSWORD?

Not a member?

Time in reverse

Related News

History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often shows a certain poetry. The juxtaposition of the 1930s and the 2010s might just demonstrate the poetic device known as chiasmus — A,B,C followed by C,B,A. In this case, A stands for steep economic decline, B for mild recovery, and C for a relatively modest fall.

The first time around, the misguided official response to the collapse of a financial bubble led to a disastrous collapse of output. A few years of monetary and fiscal ease then supported a tepid recovery. A mild monetary tightening in 1937 produced a modest relapse.

Policymakers learned their lesson, or thought they did. When the financial bubble popped in 2008, they responded with tremendous monetary and fiscal stimulus. The economic damage was limited to higher unemployment and single digit percentage declines in GDP. These policies have, however, led only to a “B” period of second-class recovery. Right now growth is weak in the United States, and almost absent in the euro zone and UK.

More worryingly, the stimulus has set the scene for a first-class collapse. The problem is debts, which continue to expand. Governments are borrowing as if there were no tomorrow, while the private sector has not really deleveraged. In the United States, total credit outstanding has increased at 3.7 per cent annually since the 2008 credit crisis, faster than the three per cent rate of nominal GDP growth. In many emerging markets, including China, Brazil, Russia and Turkey, the pace of credit growth has been double or more the rate of nominal GDP growth.

If too much credit causes crises, and it basically does, then the world is in for one. This time around, though, stimulus — effectively throwing more money into the economy — might not work. The private sector could decide that governments are untrustworthy and the new funds could lead to unacceptably high inflation. It would be hard to avoid an A-level depression.

What would come next? In the 1930s, it was impoverishment, and eventually World War Two. Everyone should hope that history finds a new refrain.

Read More

Historical mistake

UK shouldn't quit the EU - it should join the euro

Back to Top

Quick Links

Have Your Say Rss icon




Image4

Will the spot-fixing scam take the excitement out of IPL?

Financial X-Ray Rss icon

ITC clocks 3% volume growth in cigarettes

Company's FMCG business turns in a maiden profit in Q4 on higher than industry growth

Bajaj Auto: Lower tax rate boosts bottom line

Operating margin dips 200 bps on higher employee costs & other expenses

Back to Top