ALSO READNitish Kumar supports Ram Nath Kovind; proves he's nobody's man but his own Presidential polls: Why Opposition has picked Meira Kumar against Kovind Presidential polls: Will ask Nitish to not back Kovind, says Lalu Nitish Kumar meets, greets Lalu Prasad Yadav on his 70th birthday Bihar forms world's largest human chain against liquor
He said his party had always taken independent decisions, including backing the candidature of Pranab Mukherjee, who was then the UPA's nominee, for the post while being in the NDA.
"Kovind's name was announced first by the ruling party and we do not have any objection to his name. That is why we supported him," he told reporters here.
The JD(U) had on Thursday rejected its ally and RJD chief Lalu Prasad's request to reconsider its support to the NDA's presidential pick, saying its stand was based on merit and it would stick it.
"Everyone is independent to put forth views. As far as the 'mahagathbandhan' is concerned, it is not an issue of the alliance. It is a decision to be taken by each party separately," Kumar said.
He said he had met Congress president Sonia Gandhi and CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury and that he had conveyed to them that it was a matter of pride that Bihar Governor Kovind will become the next president.
Kovind had worked for Bihar without any bias, he said.
"It's an election for the post of the president. It should not become an issue of confrontation," Kumar asserted.
He said the party could have conveyed its view at the opposition meeting on Thursday to pick its nominee, but when Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad had come to Patna a day earlier he had made clear his stand.
"There should be a strategy for the 2019 general elections. This is not for victory in 2019," the Bihar chief minister said.
"You (Congress) had opportunities twice. But, why didn't you chose the 'Bihar ki beti' when she had a chance to win? I believe they should have a re-think," Kumar said, adding, "But you (Congress) have begun with a losing strategy."
He said the president's chair was not for a political battle.
"Had there been a consensus, it would have been a good thing, but I do not consider it should be a matter for raising questions," Kumar said.